View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
  • 2 School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia
  • 3 School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia
Restricted access

Abstract

The hunter-gatherer hypothesis of Silverman and Eals (1992) is the best-supported evolutionary explanation for sex differences in human spatial cognitive skills. It proposes that the sex differences in performance on a range of spatial task are a consequence of males (who hunted much more than did females) being better adapted to encode space allocentrically, and to rely on Euclidian navigational strategies employing distant landmarks, whereas females (who gathered much more than did males) are better adapted to encode space more egocentrically, navigating based more on local landmarks, and to be better able to precisely encode the position of particular objects. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the performance of male and female participants in a virtual navigation task (in which we could manipulate the landmark information available), a virtual dead-reckoning task and an object location memory task. The patterns of sex differences in the spatial tasks were strongly supportive of the hunter-gatherer hypothesis, but the sex-specific correlations between tasks thought to be underpinned by the same spatial-cognitive ability were not always supportive of the hypothesis, suggesting that the hunter-gatherer hypothesis requires some revisions or extensions.

  • R S Astur M L Ortiz R J Sutherland 1998 A characterisation of performance by men and women in virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference Behavioural Brain Research 93 185 190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R S Astur J Tropp S Sava R T Constable E J Markus 2004 Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze and mental rotation Behavioural Brain Research 151 103 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Bird 1999 Cooperation and conflict: The behavioral ecology of the sexual division of labor Evolutionary Anthropology 8 65 75.

  • A Bosco A M Longoni T Vecchi 2004 Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 519 532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J Choi I Silverman 2002 The relationship between testosterone and route-learning strategies in humans Brain and Cognition 50 116 120.

  • E Coluccia G Louse 2004 Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 329 340.

  • J M Dabbs E L Chang R A Strong R Milun 1998 Spatial ability navigation strategy and geographic knowledge among men and women Evolution and Human Behavior 19 89 98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I Driscoll D A Hamilton R A Yeo W M Brooks R J Sutherland 2005 Virtual navigation in humans: The impact of age, sex and hormones on place learning Hormones and Behavior 47 326 335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M Eals I Silverman 1994 The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays Ethology and Sociobiology 15 95 105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I Ecuyer-Dab M Robert 2004 Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and a female concern for survival? Cognition 91 221 257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I Ecuyer-Dab M Robert 2004 Spatial ability and home-range size: Examining the relationship in Western men and women (Homo sapiens) Journal of Comparative Psychology 118 217 231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L A M Galea M Kavaliers K P Ossenkopp 1996 Sexually dimorphic spatial learning in meadow voles Microtus pennsylvanicus and deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus Journal of Experimental Biology 199 195 200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L A M Galea M Kavaliers K P Ossenkopp D Innes E L Hargreaves 1994 Sexually dimorphic spatial learning varies seasonally in two populations of deer mice Brain Research 635 18 26.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L A Galea D Kimura 1993 Sex differences in route-learning Personality and Individual Differences 14 53 65.

  • S J C Gaulin R W Fitzgerald 1986 Sex differences in spatial ability: An evolutionary hypothesis and test The American Naturalist 127 74 88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • S J C Gaulin R W Fitzgerald 1989 Sexual selection for spatial learning ability Animal Behaviour 37 322 331.

  • G Grön A P Wunderlich M Spitzer R Tomczak M W Riepe 2000 Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance Nature Neuroscience 3 404 408.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D F Halpern 1996 Sex, brains, hands and spatial cognition Developmental Review 16 261 270.

  • M Hausmann G Ergun Y Yazgan O Güntürkün 2002 Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand Neuropsychologia 40 235 240.

  • R A Herman K Wallen 2007 Cognitive performance in rhesus monkeys varies by sex and prenatal androgen exposure Hormones and Behavior 51 496 507.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • T W James D Kimura 1997 Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges Evolution and Human Behavior 18 155 163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C A Lawton K A Morrin 1999 Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer simulated 3D mazes Sex Roles 40 73 92.

  • C A Lawton 1996 Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation Journal of Environmental Psychology 16 137 145.

  • M C Linn A C Petersen 1985 Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis Child Development 56 1479 1498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D H McBurney S J C Gaulin T Devineni C Adams 1997 Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis Evolution and Human Behavior 18 165 174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • S D Moffat E Hampson M Hatzipantelis 1998 Navigation in a “virtual” maze: Sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans Evolution and Human Behavior 19 73 87.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J New M M Krasnow D Truxaw S J C Gaulin 2007 Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: women excel and calories count Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 2679 2684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L Pacheco-Cobos M Rosetti C Cuatianquiz R Hudson 2010 Sex differences in mushroom gathering: men expend more energy to obtain equivalent benefits Evolution and Human Behavior 31 289 297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • K Phillips I Silverman 1997 Differences in the relationship of menstrual cycle phase to spatial performance on two- and three-dimensional tasks Hormones and Behavior 32 167 175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A Postma R Izendoorn E H de Haan 1998 Sex differences in object location memory Brain and Cognition 36 334 345.

  • A Postma G Jager R P C Kessels H P F Koppeschaar J van Honk 2004 Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory Brain and Cognition 54 24 34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A Postma J Winkel A Tuiten J van Honk 1999 Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory Psychoneuroendocrinology 24 175 192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Q Rahman D Andersson E Govier 2005 A specific sexual-orientation-related difference in navigation strategy Behavioral Neuroscience 119 311 316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • S L Rilea B Roskos-Ewolden D Boles 2004 Sex differences in spatial ability: A lateralization of function approach Brain and Cognition 56 332 343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N J Sandstrom J Kaufman S A Huettel 1998 Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task Cognitive Brain Research 6 351 360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D Saucier S M Green J Leason A MacFadden S Bell L J Elias 2002 Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? Behavioral Neuroscience 116 403 410.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D M Saucier S R Schultz A J Keller C M Cook G Binsted 2008 Sex differences in object location memory and spatial navigation in Long-Evans rats Animal Cognition 11 129 137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D F Sherry E Hampson 1997 Evolution and the hormonal control of sexually-dimorphic spatial abilities in humans Trends in Cognitive Science 1 50 55.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I Silverman M Eals 1992 Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data J H Barkow L Cosmides J Tooby The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture Oxford Press New York 531 549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I Silverman J Choi A Mackewn M Fisher J Moro E Olshansky 2000 Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences Evolution and Human Behavior 21 201 213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G Sanders K Sinclair T Walsh 2007 Testing predictions from the hunter-gatherer hypothesis — 2: Sex differences in the visual processing of near and far space Evolutionary Psychology 5 666 679.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D Sulikowski D Burke 2007 Food-specific spatial memory biases in an omnivorous bird Biology Letters 3 245 248.

  • L S Tottenham D Saucier L Elias C Gutwin 2003 Female advantage for spatial location memory in ‘both’ static and dynamic environments Brain and Cognition 53 381 383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D Voyer S Voyer M P Bryden 1995 Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables Psychological Bulletin 117 250 270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D Waller D Knapp E Hunt 2001 Spatial representations of virtual mazes: The role of visual fidelity and individual differences Human Factors 43 147 158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

No Evolutionist is an Island

A review of Kevin N. Laland and Gillian R. Brown (2011) Sense and Nonsense. Evolutionary perspectives of human behaviour Oxford: Oxford University Press. 270 pages, ISBN: 978-0-19-958696-7