The facial photographs of 84 heterosexual women were rated for attractiveness by 74 males and 74 females who also made judgements regarding the personality and behaviour of these women. Both sexes judged physically attractive women as possessing more desirable personality traits and also as being more promiscuous than less attractive women. These findings extend the beauty-is-good stereotype, also attributing a more unrestricted sexual strategy to attractive women. This is consistent with research identifying the actual strategies of attractive women. It is argued that both sexes would benefit — in terms of mate choice and identification of rivals — from identifying attractive women as likely to be more promiscuous.
R. D. Ashmore M. R. Soloman L. C. Longo 1996 Thinking about fashion models: A multidimensional approach to the structure of perceived physical attractiveness Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 1083 1104.
A. J. Bateman 1948 Intra-sexual selection in drosophila Heredity 2 349 368.
G. Brewer 2006 Patterns of physical attractiveness, self-rated attractiveness and sexual selection strategy in women University of Central Lancashire UK.
D. M. Buss M. Barnes 1986 Preferences in human mate selection Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 559 570.
D. M. Buss 1987 Sex differences in human mate selection criteria: An evolutionary perspective C. Crawford D. Krebs M. Smith Sociobiology and Psychology:^Ideas, Issues and Applications Erlbaum New Jersey.
D. M. Buss D. P. Schmitt 1993 Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating Psychological Review 100 204 232.
R. D. Clark E. Hatfield 1989 Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 2 39 55.
M. Dermer D. L. Thiel 1975 When beauty may fail Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 1168 1176.
K. Dion E. Berscheid E. Walster 1972 What is beautiful is good Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 285 290.
A. H. Eagly R. D. Ashmore M. J. Makhijani L. C. Longo 1991 What is beautiful is good, but …: A Meta-analysis of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype Psychological Bulletin 110 109 128.
H. Greiling D. M. Buss 2000 Women's sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating Personality and Individual Differences 28 929 963.
J. H. Langlois L. Kalakanis A. J. Rubenstein A. Larson M. Hallam M. Snoot 2000 Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review Psychological Bulletin 126 390 423.
S. M. Mikach J. M. Bailey 1999 What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior 20 141 150.
R. Nisbett T. D. Wilson 1977 The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 250 256.
I. S. Penton-voak N. Pound A. C. Little D. I. Perrett 2006 Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a ‘kernel of truth’ in social perception Social Cognition 24 490 524.
D. P. Schmitt D. M. Buss 2001 Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 894 917.
D. Singh 1993 Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 283 288.
D. Singh 1995 Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio Ethology and Sociobiology 16 465 481.
D. Singh 2004 Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness Journal of Sex Research 41 43 54.
M. Snyder E. Berscheid E. D. Tanke 1977 Social perception and interpersonal behaviour: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 656 666.
R. L. Trivers 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 Aldine Chicago.
M. W. Wiederman S. R. Hurst 1998 Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem Journal of Sex Research 35 272 281.