View More View Less
  • 1 Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group, Division of Psychology, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
  • 2 School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
  • 3 Evolutionary and Biological Approaches to Behaviour Research Group, Division of Psychology, University of Abertay Dundee, Bell Street, Dundee, Scotland
Restricted access

Abstract

We tested the relationships between female status and mate preferences demonstrated in previous correlational studies in an experimental manipulation of female perceptions of the status of women. To achieve this, 147 female undergraduate students considered either the advantages (positive condition) or disadvantages (negative condition) experienced by women as a result of belonging to the female gender and reported their mate preferences. We hypothesised that women in the positive condition would exhibit less traditional mate preferences (i.e. have younger ideal partner ages and maximum and minimum partner ages tolerated and stronger preferences for cues to genetic quality relative to material resources) than those in the negative condition. Condition did not affect preferences, therefore our hypotheses were not supported. There were, however, positive relationships between number of thoughts associated with the special social treatment of women and maximum partner age tolerated and number of thoughts associated with finances and mate-choice points allocated to “physically attractive” over “hard working”. There was also an interaction between occurrence of thoughts in the special social treatment category and condition on preferences for “physically attractive” over “hard working”. We conclude that our results, while consistent with previous research, do not provide experimental support for the relationships of interest and suggest that dimension-specific manipulations (e.g. of perceptions of financial status) will provide stronger tests of hypotheses.

  • A. J. Bateman 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila Heredity 2 349 368.

  • G. S. Becker 1974 A theory of social interactions Journal of Political Economics 82 1063 1094.

  • G. S. Becker 1991 A Treatise on the Family Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.

  • N. R. Branscombe 1998 Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men British Journal of Social Psychology 37 167 184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G. R. Brown K. N. Laland M. Borgerhoff Mulder 2009 Bateman's principles and human sex roles Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 297 304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D.M. Buss 1989 Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 1 49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. M. Buss 1989 Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 39 49.

  • D. M. Buss 2003 The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating Basic Books New York.

  • D. M. Buss M. Barnes 1986 Preferences in human mate selection Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 559 570.

  • D. M. Buss D. P. Schmitt 1993 Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating Psychological Review 100 204 232.

  • E. Cashdan 1993 Attracting mates: Effects of paternal investment on mate attraction strategies Ethology and Sociobiology 14 1 24.

  • L. M. Debruine B. C. Jones J. M. Tybur D. Lieberman V. Griskevicius 2010 Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust Evolution and Human Behavior 31 69 74.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. H. Eagly W. Wood 1999 The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles American Psychologist 54 408 423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. Feingold 1990 Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction — a comparison across 5 research paradigms Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 981 993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. Feingold 1991 Sex-differences in the effects of similarity and physical attractiveness on opposite sex attraction Basic Applications of Social Psychology 12 357 367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. Feingold 1992 Gender differences in mate selection preferences — a test of the parental investment model Psychological Bulletin 112 125 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M. Fieder S. Huber 2007 Parental age difference and offspring count in humans Biology Letters 3 689 691.

  • A. Furnham 2009 Sex differences in mate selection preferences Personality and Individual Differences 47 262 267.

  • S. W. Gangestad 1993 Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: Implications for mating dynamics Human Nature 4 205 235.

  • S. W. Gangestad D. M. Buss 1993 Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences Ethology and Sociobiology 14 89 96.

  • S. W. Gangestad A. S. Simpson 2000 The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 573 587.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • C. Gil-Burmann F. Pelaez S. Sanchez 2002 Mate choice differences according to sex and age: An analysis of personal advertisements in Spanish newspapers Human Nature 13 493 508.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • P. Glick S. T. Fiske 1996 The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 491 512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • P. A. Gowaty 1992 Evolutionary biology and feminism Human Nature 3 217 249.

  • S. B. Hrdy 1997 Raising Darwin's consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy Human Nature 8 1 49.

  • United Nations Gender Empowerment Measure 1995 Human Development Report Oxford University Press New York.

  • M. C. Johannessen-Schmidt A. H. Eagly 2002 Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 322 328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • V. S. Johnston R. Hagel M. Franklin B. Fink K. Grammer 2001 Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for a hormone-mediated adaptive design Evolution and Human Behavior 22 251 267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M. Jokela 2009 Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States Evolution and Human Behavior 30 342 350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • T. Kasser Y. S. Sharma 1999 Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females’ preference for resource-acquisition characteristics in mates Psychological Science 10 374 377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. T. Kenrick R. C. Keefe 1992 Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 75 133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • H. Kokko 2008 Human parental age difference and offspring count: And we still don't know what men or women want Biology Letters 4 259 260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N. F. Koyama A. Macgain R. A. Hill 2004 Self-reported mate preferences and “feminist” attitudes regarding marital relations Evolution and Human Behavior 25 327 335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. J. Lambert S. R. Khan B. A. Lickel K. Fricke 1997 Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 1002 1016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N. P. Li D. T. Kenrick M. Bailey 2002 The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 947 955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. C. Little B. C. Jones L. M. Debruine 2008 Preferences for variation in masculinity in real male faces change across the menstrual cycle Personality and Individual Differences 45 478 482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A. C. Little B. C. Jones I. S. Penton-voak D. M. Burt D. I. Perrett 2002 Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269 1095 1100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • B. S. Low 1990 Sex, power and resources: Male and female strategies of resource acquisition International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 27 49 73.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • V. J. Magely C. L. Hulin L. F. Fitzgerald M. Denardo 1999 Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment The Journal of Applied Psychology 84 390 402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • F. Marlowe 1999 Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46 57 64.

  • F. R. Moore C. Cassidy 2007 Female status predicts female mate preferences across non industrial societies Cross Cultural Research 41 66 74.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, F. R. & Cassidy, C. (submitted manuscript): Female perceptions of the costs and benefits of belonging to the female gender. Sex Roles.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • F. R. Moore C. Cassidy M. J. Law Smith D. I. Perrett 2006 The effects of female control of resources in sex differentiated mate preferences Evolution and Human Behavior 27 195 205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R. Noe P. Hammerstein 1995 Biological market Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10 336 339.

  • E. Otta R. Da Silva Queiroz L. De Sousa Campos M. T. Silveira 1999 Age differences between spouses in a Brazilian marriage sample Evolution and Human Behavior 20 99 103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I. S. Penton-Voak D. I. Perrett D. L. Castles T. Kobayashi D. M. Burt L. K. Murray R. Minamisawa 1999 Female preference for male faces changes cyclically Nature 399 741 742.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • I. S. Penton-voak D. I. Perrett 2000 Male facial attractiveness: Perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle Advances in the Study of Behavior 30 219 259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J. R. Roney Z. L. Simmons 2008 Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone Hormones and Behaviour 53 14 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • N. Schwarz G. Clore 2007 Feelings and phenomenol experiences E. T. Higgins A. Kruglanski Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles 2nd ed. Guildford New York 385 407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R. W. Smuts 1989 Behavior depends on context Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 33 34.

  • R. W. Smuts 1991 Preference and behavior — response Ethology and Sociobiology 12 409 410.

  • R. W. Smuts 1991 The present also explains the past — response Ethology and Sociobiology 12 77 82.

  • C. Stangor J. K. Swim G. B. Sechrist J. Decoster K. L. Vanallen A. Ottenbreit 2003 Ask, answer, and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination European Review of Social Psychology 14 277 311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. M. Taylor S. C. Wright L. E. Porter 1994 Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy M. P. Zanna J. M. Olson The Psychology of Prejudice: The Ontario Symposium, 7 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 233 255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J. M. Townsend 1989 Mate selection criteria: A pilot study Ethology and Sociobiology 10 241 253.

  • R. L. Trivers 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection B. Campbell Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man Aldine Publishing Group Chicago, IL 136 179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • J. D. Vorauer S. M. Kumhyr 2001 Is this about you or me? Self versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 706 719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. Waynforth 1999 Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize Evolution and Human Behavior 20 19 28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. Waynforth 2001 Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men Human Nature 12 207 219.

  • D. Waynforth S. Delwadia M. Camm 2005 The influence of women's mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture Evolution and Human Behavior 26 409 416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D. Waynforth R. I. M. Dunbar 1995 Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from’ Lonely Hearts’ advertisements Behaviour 132 755 779.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • M. W. Weiderman E. R. Allgeier 1992 Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socio-economic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology 13 115 124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • F. G. West J. F. Finch P. J. Curran 1995 Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies R. H. Hoyle Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues and Applications Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • W. Wood A. H. Eagly 2002 A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences Psychological Bulletin 128 699 727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation