View More View Less
  • 1 Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Institute of Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience H-1394 Budapest P.O. Box 398 Hungary
  • | 2 Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences H-1111 Budapest Stoczek u. 2 Hungary
  • | 3 University of Leipzig Institute of Psychology Seeburgstr. 14–20 D-04103 Leipzig Germany
  • | 4 Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg Institute of Psychology Ammerländer Heerstr. 114–118 D-26129 Oldenburg Germany
  • | 5 University of Plymouth Cognition Institute and Centre for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA UK
  • | 6 University of Szeged Institute of Psychology H-6722 Szeged Petőfi S. sgt. 30–34 Hungary
Restricted access

In our surrounding acoustic world sounds are produced by different sources and interfere with each other before arriving to the ears. A key function of the auditory system is to provide consistent and robust descriptions of the coherent sound groupings and sequences (auditory objects), which likely correspond to the various sound sources in the environment. This function has been termed auditory stream segregation. In the current study we tested the effects of separation in the frequency of amplitude modulation on the segregation of concurrent sound sequences in the auditory stream–segregation paradigm (van Noorden 1975). The aim of the study was to assess 1) whether differential amplitude modulation would help in separating concurrent sound sequences and 2) whether this cue would interact with previously studied static cues (carrier frequency and location difference) in segregating concurrent streams of sound. We found that amplitude modulation difference is utilized as a primary cue for the stream segregation and it interacts with other primary cues such as frequency and location difference.

  • Anstis, S., Saida, S. (1985): Adaptation to Auditory Streaming of Frequency-Modulated Tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Perception and Performance, 11, 257–271.

  • Bendixen, A., Bőhm, T. M., Szalárdy, O., Mill, R., Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2012): Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation. Learning and Perception, 4, 37–54.

  • Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Winkler, I. (2010): Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3658–3666.

  • Blake, R., Logothetis, N. K. (2002): Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–23.

  • Bregman, A. S. (1990): Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Bregman, A. S., Abramson, J., Doehring, P., Darwin, C. J. (1985): Spectral integration based on common amplitude-modulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 483–493.

  • Ciocca, V. (2008): The auditory organization of complex sounds. Frontiers in Bioscience, 13, 148–169.

  • Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2012): Perceptual bistability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, 4, 73–96.

  • Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2010): Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. In: Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Palmer, A. R., Meddis, R. (eds.): The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, pp. 477–487.

  • Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2006): The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100, 154–70.

  • Dollezal, L. V., Beutelmann, R., Klump, G. M. (2012): Stream segregation in the perception of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Plos One, 7, e43615.

  • Du, Y., He, Y., Ross, B., Bardouille, T., Wu, X. H., Li, L. A., Alain, C. (2011): Human auditory cortex activity shows additive effects of spectral and spatial cues during speech segregation. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 698–707.

  • Griffiths, T. D., Warren, J. D. (2004): What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 887–892.

  • Grimault, N., Bacon, S. P., Micheyl, C. (2002): Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1340–1348.

  • Grimault, N., Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., Arthaud, P., Collet, L. (2000): Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 263–271.

  • Hartmann, W. M., Johnson, D. (1991): Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Perception, 9, 155–184.

  • Leopold, D. A., Logothetis, N. K. (1999): Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254–264.

  • Moore, B. C. J., Gockel, H. (2002): Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320–333.

  • Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., Rubin, N. (2010): Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–18.

  • Pressnitzer, D., Hupe, J. M. (2006): Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16, 1351–1357.

  • Rigby, R. A., Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005): Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Applied Statistics, 54, 507–554.

  • Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. J. (2002): Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2074–2085.

  • Schulze, H., Langner, G. (1997): Periodicity coding in the primary auditory cortex of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): two different coding strategies for pitch and rhythm? Journal of Comparative Physiology a-Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology, 181, 651–663.

  • Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., Micheyl, C. (2011): Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 114–123.

  • Snyder, J. S., Alain, C. (2007): Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 780–799.

  • Therneau, T., Lumley, T. (2011): survival: Survival Analysis Including Penalised Likelihood. R package version 2.36-3, url: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival

  • van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975): Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.

  • Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Nelken, I. (2009): Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532–540.

Learning & Perception
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
2009
Publication
Programme
ceased
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1789-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2060-9175 (Online)