1. PD Batista MG Campiteli O Kinouchi 2006 Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68 179 189.

1. PD Batista MG Campiteli O Kinouchi 2006 Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68 179 189.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

2. C Bergstrom 2007 Eigenfactor. Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals Coll Res Libr News 68 314 316.

2. C Bergstrom 2007 Eigenfactor. Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals Coll Res Libr News 68 314 316.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

3. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet]. Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009, http://www.eigenfactor.org/index.php (megnézve: 2009. 03. 02.).

3. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet] . Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009, http://www.eigenfactor.org/index.php (megnézve: 2009. 03. 02.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

4. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet]. Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009. Methods, http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.htm (megnézve: 2009. 03. 12.).

4. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet] . Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009. Methods, http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.htm (megnézve: 2009. 03. 12.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

5. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet]. Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009. Methods. EigenfactorTM Score and Article InfluenceTM Score: Detailed methods, http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.pdf (megnézve: 2009. 03. 12.).

5. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor.orgTM: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet] . Washington: Department of Biology at the University of Washington; c2009. Methods. EigenfactorTM Score and Article InfluenceTM Score: Detailed methods, http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.pdf (megnézve: 2009. 03. 12.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

6. C Bergstrom JD West MA Wiseman 2008 The EigenfactorTM Metrics J Neurosci 28 11433 11434.

6. C Bergstrom JD West MA Wiseman 2008 The EigenfactorTM Metrics J Neurosci 28 11433 11434.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

7. L Bornmann HD Daniel 2009 The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep 10 2 6.

7. L Bornmann HD Daniel 2009 The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep 10 2 6.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

8. Bornmann L , Marx W, Schier H. Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: A comparison of new metrics with the Journal Impact Factor. Preprint of an article accepted for publication in the European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009, http://www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/BornmannSubmissionRevision.pdf (megnézve: 2009. 03. 16.).

8. Bornmann L , MarxW, SchierH.Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: A comparison of new metrics with the Journal Impact Factor. Preprint of an article accepted for publication in the European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009, http://www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/BornmannSubmissionRevision.pdf (megnézve: 2009. 03. 16.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

9. L Bornmann R Mutz HD Daniel 2008 Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from Biomedicine J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 59 830 837.

9. L Bornmann R Mutz HD Daniel 2008 Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from Biomedicine J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 59 830 837.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

10. T Braun W Glänzel A Schubert 2006 A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist 19:8, 2005 Extended version: Scientometrics 69 169 173.

10. T Braun W Glänzel A Schubert 2006 A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist 19:8, 2005 Extended version: Scientometrics 69 169 173.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

11. Butler D. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market. Database offers on-the-fly results. Nature [Internet] 451, 2008. http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080102/full/451006a.html.

11. Butler D. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market. Database offers on-the-fly results. Nature [Internet]451, 2008. http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080102/full/451006a.html.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

12. PM Davis 2008 Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better journal impact estimates than raw citation counts? American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 2186 2188 Preprint of an article accepted July 9, 2008 for publication in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

12. PM Davis 2008 Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better journal impact estimates than raw citation counts? American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 2186 2188 Preprint of an article accepted July 9, 2008 for publication in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

13. ME Falagas VD Kouranos R Arencibia-Jorge et al.2008 Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor FASEB J 22 2623 2628.

13. ME Falagas VD Kouranos R Arencibia-Jorge 2008 Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor FASEB J 22 2623 2628.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

14. JE Hirsch 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific output Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 16569 16572.

14. JE Hirsch 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific output Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 16569 16572.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

15. SL Rovner 2008 The import of impact. New types of journal metrics grow more influential in the scientific community Chem Eng News 86 39 42.

15. SL Rovner 2008 The import of impact. New types of journal metrics grow more influential in the scientific community Chem Eng News 86 39 42.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

16. Schreiber M. Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index. Accepted for publication in Europhys Lett, arXiv:physics/0701231v2 [physics.soc-ph] 16 Mar 2007, http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701231v2 (megnézve: 2009. 03. 09.).

16. Schreiber M. Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index . Accepted for publication in Europhys Lett, arXiv:physics/0701231v2 [physics.soc-ph] 16 Mar 2007, http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701231v2 (megnézve: 2009. 03. 09.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

17. SCImago Research Group. SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. Spain: SCImago Research Group; c2007, http://www.scimagojr.com (megnézve: 2009. 03. 13.).

17. SCImago Research Group. SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. Spain: SCImago Research Group; c2007, http://www.scimagojr.com (megnézve: 2009. 03. 13.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

18. West J. Eigenfactor : pulling the stories out of the data. Research Trends Newsletter 8, 2008, http://www.info.scopus.com/researchtrends/archive/RT8/exp_op_8.html (megnézve: 2009. 03. 17.).

18. West J. Eigenfactor : pulling the stories out of the data. Research Trends Newsletter8, 2008, http://www.info.scopus.com/researchtrends/archive/RT8/exp_op_8.html (megnézve: 2009. 03. 17.).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation