Authors:
Attila Doros Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Baross u. 23, H-1082, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Attila Doros in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pál Ákos Deák Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Pál Ákos Deák in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Erika Hartmann Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Erika Hartmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrea Németh Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Andrea Németh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zsuzsa Gerlei Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Zsuzsa Gerlei in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
János Fazakas Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by János Fazakas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dénes Görög Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Dénes Görög in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Balázs Nemes Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Balázs Nemes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Imre Fehérvári Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Imre Fehérvári in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
László Kóbori Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by László Kóbori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Introduction: Biliary strictures remain a key problem after liver transplantation. Anastomotic strictures are treated by surgery or interventional therapy. Intrahepatic stenosis requires retransplantation. For bridging, percutaneous and endoscopic interventions are used. The extent of the strictures may have an important role in therapy planning. Methods: Strictures were divided into four zones (1: extrahepatic, not included in this study; 2: hilar; 3: central; 4: peripheral). Twenty patients were treated with balloon dilatation/stent implantation/retransplantation/supportive care (Zone 1: 0/0/0/0; Zone 2: 8/7/2/0; Zone 3: 7/5/2/1; Zone 4: 1/1/3/1). Results: Mean follow-up time was 48 months. In Zone 2, one patient died as a result of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and seven patients are alive, five after stent placements and two after retransplantation. Four patients are alive in Zone 3: all had stent placements and one later retransplantation. One patient died after retransplantation, two on the waiting list, and one due to chronic liver failure. One patient is alive in Zone 4 after early retransplantation, and three died. Conclusion: Percutaneous therapy is safe and effective in intrahepatic biliary stenosis after liver transplantation. It can provide the cure or bridge retransplantation. Based on zonal classification, we recommend the following treatments: Zone 4: early retransplantation; Zone 2: minimally invasive therapy; Zone 3: individual decisions.

  • 1. K. Abdullah et al.2005 Incidence and management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: ten years' experience at King Fahad National Guard Hospital Transplant Proc 37 3179 3181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. L. Polese et al.2007 Endoscopic treatment of bile duct complications after orthotopic liver transplantation Transplant Proc 39 1942 1944.

  • 3. A.P. Holt et al.2007 A prospective study of standardized nonsurgical therapy in the management of biliary anastomotic strictures complicating liver transplantation Transplantation 84 857 863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. C.B. Bellido et al.2010 Indications for and survival after liver retransplantation Transplant Proc 42 637 640.

  • 5. R.C. Verdonk et al.2007 Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 2: Management, outcome, and risk factors for disease progression Liver Transpl 13 725 732.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. J.F. Glockner et al.1999 Vascular or ischemic complications after liver transplantation AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 1055 1059.

  • 7. C. Margarit et al.1998 Biliary complications secondary to late hepatic artery thrombosis in adult liver transplant patients Transpl Int 11 Suppl1 S251 S254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. C.I. Buis et al.2006 Causes and consequences of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13 517 524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. C.I. Buis et al.2007 Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs. late presentation Liver Transpl 13 708 718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. R. Marudanayagam et al.2010 Liver retransplantation in adults: a single-centre, 25-year experience HPB (Oxford) 12 217 224.

  • 11. D. Eurich et al.2009 Successful endoscopic and surgical management of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation — case report Ann Transplant 14 47 51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. F. Filipponi et al.2002 Extended right hepatectomy as graft-saving option in non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation Hepatogastroenterology 49 1679 1681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. J.W. Ostroff 2010 Management of biliary complications in the liver transplant patient Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 6 264 272.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

2019  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,220
Scimago
Quartile Score
Medicine (miscellaneous) Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
155/133=1,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Medicine 199/529 (Q2)
Scopus
SNIP
0,343
Scopus
Cites
206
Scopus
Documents
23

 

Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
2009
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2061-1617 (Print)
ISSN 2061-5094 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Aug 2024 33 0 0
Sep 2024 22 0 0
Oct 2024 66 0 0
Nov 2024 30 0 0
Dec 2024 9 0 0
Jan 2025 5 0 0
Feb 2025 0 0 0