View More View Less
  • 1 National Institute of Legal Medicine “Mina Minovici”, Bucharest, Romania “Titu Maiorescu” University, Bucharest, Romania
  • | 2 Str. Sf. Niceta, nr. 29, Sector 2, 023743, Bucharest, Romania
Restricted access

Abstract

Torture and death in custody have incurred rapid development as juridical subject in recent years in Europe, with the implementation of the European Convention of Human Rights. Evaluation of sufferance severity, which is the consequence of pathology with chronic evolution, the predictability of decompensation of a subclinical pathology, and translating these medical information on a scale measuring the severity of detention consequences, are all challenges for the modern detention healthcare system, in which most allegations of torture are due to lack of appropriate medical treatment administered to inmates. Where ethics are concerned, the main data difficulties are addressed in ethical conflicts between officials and experts of the parties and also between experts and judiciary officials who handle cases of torture or death in detention; this is why standardization is very important in such cases both in clinical expertise and in autopsies or exhumations.

Discussions

We must improve the forensic expertise methodology, the process of collecting data with statistical purposes, and sound evaluation criteria, all in a strong connection with the need for a balanced legal framework applied in the case of civil compensations granted after death in custody, and the biunique relation between medico-legal expertise and case investigation has to be standardized.

  • 1. ECHR, McCann et autres c. Royaume-Uni, arrèt du 27 Septembre 1995, série A no 324, pp. 4546, § 147.

  • 2. Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; L.C.B. c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 9 Juin 1998, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-III, § 36; Calvelli et Ciglio c. Italie [GC], no 32967/96, § 48, ECHR 2002-I; Byrzykowski c. Pologne, no 11562/05, § 104, 27 Juin 2006; Erikson c. Italie (déc.), no 37900/97, 26 Octobre 1999; et Powell c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 45305/99, ECHR 2000; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002-IX.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Commission nationale de déontologie de la sécurité (CNDS) France, Rapport sur l'accès aux soins des personnes privées de liberté 2001–2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Schmandt C-A : La suspension de peine pour raisons medicale, Memoire du Master Droit, Lille 2, Universite du Droit et de la Sante, http://edoctorale74.univ-lille2.fr.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. ECHR, Bönisch c. Austria, Hotărârea din 6 Mai 1985, seria A, nr. 92, p. 1416; Mantovanelli c. Franţei, Hotărârea din 18 Martie 1997; Buzescu v. România (Decizia nr. 61302/2000 din 24 May, 2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. CPT 2008, Rapport au Gouvernement de la Roumanie relatif à la visite effectuée en Roumanie par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 8 au 19 Juin 2006, http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/rom/2008-41-inf-fra.pdf.

  • 7. P.A. Singer A.M. Viens 2008 The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics Cambridge University Press Cambridge 33.

  • 8. Stan C : The implications of the decisions of European Court of Human Rights in the Legal Medical Expertise, XXth Congress of International Academy of Legal Medicine, August 2006, Budapest, Hungary.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. ECHR, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 94, 26 Octobre 2000; Price c. Royaume-Uni, no 33394/96, 10 Juillet 2007; Rivière c. France, no 33834/03, § 62, 11 Juillet 2006; Gagiu v. Romania (no. 63258/00, § 57, 24 February 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Stan C : Thinking Human Dignity, European Science Foundation Research Conference, “Pathways of Human Dignity: From Cultural Traditions to a New Paradigm,” 31 October–4 November 2007, Vadstena, Sweden.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Stan C : Global Justice and Forensic Practice, XXI Congress of the International Academy of Legal Medicine, 28–30 May 2009, Lisbon, Portugal.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. ECHR, Calvelli et Ciglio précité, § 49, Byrzykowski précité § 104; Erikson (déc.) précitée; et Powell (déc.) précitée; Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni, no 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II; Eugenia Lazăr c. România (32146/05), 16 February, 2010, Baldovin c. Roumanie (Requête no 11385/05), 7 Juin 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Stan C : Medical malpractice — a holistic health approach, The VII National Conference on Bioethics 2011, 2225 September 2011, Bucharest, Romania.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. ECHR, Duval c. France, 19868/08, 26/05/2011; Andrzej Wwierzbicki v. Poland, 48/03, 19/01/2010; Sakkopoulos c. Grèce, no 61828/00, § 38, 15 Janvier 2004, Henaf c. France (no 65436/01, ECHR 2003-XI); Sishmanov c. Bulgarie, no 37449/02, 8 Janvier 2009, § 44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Stan C : Suitability for Detention-The European Concept of Detention Interruption Due to Medical Reason, ESF-LiU Conference-Violations of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Investigation and Prevention of Torture and Death in Custody, 3–7 May 2010, Scandic Linkoping Vast, Sweden.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. The House of Lords, The House of Common, Joint Committee on Human Rights, Deaths in Custody Third Report of Session 2004–05, 14 December, 2004, United Kingdom.

  • 18. H. Steffen K. Manfred H. Stefan S. Dankwart 2009 Deaths in German police custody Eur J Pub Health 16 6 597 601.

  • 19. ECHR, Šilih c. Slovénie [GC], no 71463/01, § 192, 9 Avril 2009.

  • 20. M.S. Pollanen D.A. Chiasson J.T. Cairns J.G. Young 1998 Unexpected death related to restraint for excited delirium: a retrospective study of deaths in police custody and in the community CMAJ 158 12 1603 1607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Stan C : Forensic expertise in death in custody, International Symposium on Legal Medicine, “Medico-legal emergencies and death in custody” (4th Symposium of the Osteuropa-Verein e.V) 23–26 June, 2011, Tirgu Mures, Romania.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. D.L. Ross T.C. Chan 2006 Sudden Deaths in Custody Humana Press Inc. Totowa, New Jersey, USA.

  • 23. V.J.M. Di Maio D.J. Di Maio 2001 Forensic Pathology 2nd Ed CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.

  • 24. ECHR, Predică v. Romania (Application no. 42344/07), 7 June 2011.

  • 25. ECHR, Şercău v. Romania (Application no. 41775/06), 5 June 2012.

  • 26. G.A. Lancaster R. Whittington et al. 2008 Does the position of restraint of disturbed psychiatric patients have any association with staff and patient injuries? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 15 4 306 312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. J. Parkes 2008 Sudden death during restraint: do some positions affect lung function? Med Sci Law 48 2 137 141.

  • 28. B.A. Michalewicz T.C. Chan et al. 2007 Ventilatory and metabolic demands during aggressive physical restraint in healthy adults J Forensic Sci 52 1 171 175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. M. Blyth R. Newman C. Wright 2009 Children and young people in custody-managing the risk The Policy Press, University of Bristol UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 2005, vol, II, pp. 5673, 279–280, vol. III.

  • 31. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd Ed, 2003, pp. 272, 2173.

  • 32. J.R. Jauchem 2010 Deaths in custody: are some due to electronic control devices (including TASER devices) or excited delirium? J Forensic Legal Med 17 1 1 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. D.J. Pounder 1997 Shaken adult syndrome Am J Forensic Med Pathol 18 4 321 324.

  • 34. W.G.K. Stritzke S. Lewandowsky D. Denemark J. Clare F. Morgan 2009 Terrorism and Torture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council — Establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (2011/0129 (COD), 18 May, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 64 63 6
Full Text Views 9 2 0
PDF Downloads 3 1 0