Community Ecology
Volume/Issue:
Volume 1: Issue 2
Leaf water relations for 23 angiosperm species from steppe grasslands and associated habitats in Hungary
Authors:
D. Krasser Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Alkotmány u. 4., H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary

Search for other papers by D. Krasser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
D. Krasser Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Alkotmány u. 4., H-2163 Vácrátót, Hungary

Search for other papers by D. Krasser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. Kalapos Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, L. Eötvös University Ludovika tér 2., H-1083 Budapest

Search for other papers by T. Kalapos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
T. Kalapos Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, L. Eötvös University Ludovika tér 2., H-1083 Budapest

Search for other papers by T. Kalapos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Pages:
123–131
Online Publication Date:
26 Jan 2006
Publication Date:
01 Jan 2001
Article Category:
Journal Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1556/comec.1.2000.2.1
Keywords:
Leaf water potential; Leaf water potential; Osmotic potential; Pressure - volume analysis; Specific leaf area; Steppe grassland
Restricted access

Pressure-volume (p-V) analysis, instantaneous transpiration rate and relevant leaf structural information were used to compare leaf water relations for 23 angiosperm species from semiarid temperate loess-, sand- and saline steppe grasslands and several associated habitats representing a water availability gradient. For the species studied, the most marked differences occurred between grasses and dicots. Grasses in our survey possessed low (highly negative) osmotic potential both at water saturation and at turgor loss, moderate transpiration rate, relatively high leaf dry matter proportion (DMP) and - except for the sclerophyllous Festuca species - high specific leaf area (SLA, area per unit dry mass). In contrast, dicots had lower bulk tissue elasticity, higher (less negative) osmotic potentials, intense transpiration, and lower SLA andDMP than grasses. Therefore, grasses mainly invest in osmotic potential to extract water from drying soil, while dicots rely on relatively inelastic tissue that decreases water potential by a rapid drop of turgor with turgor loss occurring at relatively high water content. Habitat effects were significant for osmotic parameters only. Osmotic potential at full turgor and at turgor loss decreased in the following order: loess grassland ? sand grassland ??saline grassland ? loess wall. Life form influenced leaf structure only, since annuals possessed markedly higher SLA and lower DMP than perennials. Comparison of habitat specialist species within the same genus revealed that certain congeners (Achillea and Aster spp.) do not differ significantly in leaf water relations, thus they might rely on similar water supply in the three steppes. Other congeners (Festuca, Kochia and Plantago spp.) differed considerably, thus for these plants leaf function and structure must be different to ensure survival under the contrasting water regime. For the two generalist grasses (Cynodon dactylon and Dactylis glomerata) habitat-specific populations showed a tendency of increasing capacity for water extraction from soil (more negative water potential) with increasing habitat dryness, although differences were significant only between the extremes of the water availability gradient.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Community Ecology
Community Ecology An Interdisciplinary Journal Reporting Progress in Community and Population Studies
Print ISSN:
1585-8553
Online ISSN:
1588-2756

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation		 2000
Volumes
per Year		 1
Issues
per Year		 3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher		 Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Oct 2024 34 0 0
Nov 2024 8 0 0
Dec 2024 9 0 0
Jan 2025 19 0 0
Feb 2025 17 0 0
Mar 2025 10 0 0
Apr 2025 0 0 0