Authors:
F. Tinya

Search for other papers by F. Tinya in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Mihók Loránd Eötvös University Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology Pázmány P. sétány 1/C H-1117 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by B. Mihók in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Márialigeti Loránd Eötvös University Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology Pázmány P. sétány 1/C H-1117 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by S. Márialigeti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zs. Mag Loránd Eötvös University Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology Pázmány P. sétány 1/C H-1117 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Zs. Mag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
P. Ódor Loránd Eötvös University Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology Pázmány P. sétány 1/C H-1117 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by P. Ódor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Three indirect light measurement methods were compared in mixed deciduous and coniferous forests with heterogeneous stand structure: tRAYci — a spatially explicit light model calculating percentage of above canopy light (PACL); LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer measuring diffuse non-interceptance (D1FN); and spherical densiometer estimating canopy openness (CO). Correlations between the different light variables were analyzed at several spatial scales (at 5 × 5, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20 and 30 × 30 m 2 ). Relationships between light variables and the cover of alight flexible plant, blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus agg.), as a potentially sensitive response variable for light conditions were also investigated. LAI-2000 (D1FN) and tRAYci (PACL) seemed the most appropriate for the description of the light environment in the investigated stands. D1FN and PACL had stronger correlations with each other and with blackberry cover than CO. Spatial heterogeneity of light (expressed with coefficient of variation) showed much stronger correlations than mean values both between the methods and between light intensity and Rubus cover. The correlation values between the methods increased towards coarser scales (from 5 × 5 to 30 × 30 m 2 ), while the correlation between light intensity and blackberry cover had a maximal response at the scale of 20 × 20 m 2 if a lower resolution of light estimation was used, and had also a maximum at smaller scales if the light was calculated for more points per plot by tRAYci. LAI-2000 can be recommended for the comparison of different stands, however, for fine scale description of light conditions of a stand tRAYci seems to be more appropriate.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)