Authors:
G. Brownstein

Search for other papers by G. Brownstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Döbert University of Otago Botany Department P.O. Box 56 Dunedin New Zealand

Search for other papers by T. Döbert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Dobbie University of Otago Botany Department P.O. Box 56 Dunedin New Zealand

Search for other papers by L. Dobbie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N. Hashim University of Otago Botany Department P.O. Box 56 Dunedin New Zealand

Search for other papers by N. Hashim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. Bastow Wilson University of Otago Botany Department P.O. Box 56 Dunedin New Zealand

Search for other papers by J. Bastow Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Ecotones have long been a focus of ecological research, and there is considerable current interest in functional traits in community ecology. Yet, surprisingly, the functional trait approach has not been applied to ecotones. A bog-forest sequence in southern New Zealand was sampled with a grid of quadrats, and eight traits related to leaf function were measured on the 54 species found. Two ecotones were identified using moving-window analysis: Ecotone I was the transition from bog to edge forest, and Ecotone II was the transition from edge forest to tall climax forest. No strict ecotonal species were present. In contrast to theoretical predictions, species richness was not higher or lower in either ecotone, rather, both ecotones represented a transition in richness from one community to the other. It has long been said that ecotones are mosaics, but species mosaicity was no higher in either ecotone than in the adjacent communities, in fact it was lower in Ecotone I. Functional trait diversity decreased along the sequence from bog to forest, with no deviation in either ecotone. However, examining mosaicity in terms of traits, there was a steady rise in Ecotone I and, in conformance with ecotone / functional trait theory, a clear peak in Ecotone II. We conclude that the features claimed for ecotones are often not present, and whether they are present is dependent on the components measured: species vs traits. Here, the clearest patterns were seen in trait mosaicity, but even this differed markedly between the two ecotones. Generalisations about ecotones should be avoided; they will vary from ecotone to ecotone, and probably depend on the type of ecotone: anthropogenic, environmental, switch, etc.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Material
  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)