Search for other papers by I. Geedicke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Schultz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B. Rudolph in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. Oldeland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Species richness is a widespread measure to evaluate the effect of different management histories on plant communities and their biodiversity. However, analysing the phylogenetic structure of plant communities could provide new insights into the effects of different management methods on community assemblages and provide further guidance for conservation decisions. Heathlands require permanent management to ensure the existence of such a cultural landscape. While traditional management with grazing is time consuming, mechanical methods are often applied but their consequences on the phylogenetic community assemblages are still unclear. We sampled 60 vegetation plots in dry sandy heathlands (EU habitat type 2310) in northern Germany stratified by five different heathland management histories: fire, plaggen (turf cutting), mowing, deforestation and intensive grazing. Due to the distant relationship of vascular plants and lichens, we assembled two phylogenetic trees, one for vascular plants and one for lichens. We then calculated phylogenetic diversity (PD) and measures of phylogenetic community structure for vascular plant and lichen communities. Deforested areas supported significantly higher PD values for vascular plant communities. We found that PD was strongly correlated with species richness (SR) but the calculation of rarefied PD was uncorrelated to SR leading to a different ranking of management histories. We observed phylogenetic clustering in the lichen communities but not for vascular plants. Thus, management by mowing and intensive grazing promotes habitat filtering of lichens, while management histories that cause greater disturbance such as fire and plaggen do not seem to affect phylogenetic community structure. The set of management strategies fulfilled the goals of the managers in maintaining a healthy heathland community structure. However, management strategies that cause less disturbance can offer an additional range of habitat for other taxonomic groups such as lichen communities.
Supplementary Materials
- Supplementary Material
-
Bailey, R.H. 1976. Ecological aspects of dispersal and establishment in lichens. In: Brown, D.H., Hawksworth, D.L. and Bailey, R.H. (eds), Lichenology: Progress and Problems. Academic Press, London. pp. 215–247.
-
Barclay-Estrup, P. and Gimingham, C.H. 1969. The description and interpretation of cyclical processes in a heath community: I. vegetational change in relation to the calluna cycle. J. Ecol. 57: 737–758.
-
Bossuyt, B., Honnay, O., van Stichelen, K., Hermy, M. and van Assche, J. 2001. The effect of a complex land use history on the restoration possibilities of heathland in central Belgium. Belg. J. Bot. 134: 29–40.
-
Cadotte, M.W., Cardinale, B.J. and Oakley, T.H. 2008. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105: 17012–17017.
-
Cadotte, M.W., Jonathan Davies, T., Regetz, J., Kembel, S.W., Cleland, E. and Oakley, T.H. 2010. Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ccological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett. 13: 96–105.
-
Cavender-Bares, J., Keen, A. and Miles, B. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87: 109–122.
-
Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K.H., Fine, P.V.A. and Kembel, S.W. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12: 693–715.
-
Cooper, N., Rodríguez, J. and Purvis, A. 2008. A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275: 2031–2037.
-
Dereeper, A., Guignon, V., Blanc, G., Audic, S., Buffet, S., Chevenet, F., Dufayard, J.-F., Guindon, S., Lefort, V., Lescot, M., et al. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: 465–469.
-
Dinnage, R. 2009. Disturbance alters the phylogenetic composition and structure of plant communities in an old field system. PLoS ONE 4, e7071.
-
Egorov, E., Prati, D., Durka, W., Michalski, S., Fischer, M., Schmitt, B., Blaser, S. and Brändle, M. 2014. Does land-use intensification decrease plant phylogenetic diversity in local grasslands? PLOS ONE 9, e103252.
-
Faith, D.P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61: 1–10.
-
Faith, D.P., Reid, C.A.M. and Hunter, J. 2004. Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment. Conserv. Biol. 18: 255–261.
-
Fontaine, K.M., Ahti, T. and Piercey-Normore, M.D. 2010. Convergent evolution in Cladonia gracilis and allies. The Lichenologist 42: 323–338.
-
Gerhold, P., Cahill, J.F., Winter, M., Bartish, I.V. and Prinzing, A. 2015. Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better). Funct. Ecol. 29: 600–614.
-
Giraudoux, P. 2009. pgirmess: Data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.5.9.
-
Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 326: 119–157.
-
Hall, T. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98.
-
Helms, G., Friedl, T. and Rambold, G. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the Physciaceae inferred from rDNA sequence data and selected phenotypic characters. Mycologia 95: 1078–1099.
-
Helmus, M.R., Bland, T.J., Williams, C.K. and Ives, A.R. 2007. Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity. Am. Nat. 169: E68–E83.
-
Hülsenbeck, J.P. and Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
-
Keienburg, T. and Prüter, J. 2006. Naturschutzgebiet Lüneburger Heide: Erhaltung und Entwicklung einer alten Kulturlandschaft. Mitteilungen Aus NNA 17, 65.
-
Kembel, S.W., Cowan, P.D., Helmus, M.R., Cornwell, W.K., Morlon, H., Ackerly, D.D., Blomberg, S.P. and Webb, C.O. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26: 1463–1464.
-
Kuzmina, M. and Ivanova, N. 2011. Amplification for Plants and Fungi. Canadian Centre for DNA barcoding, Guelph, Canada.
-
Lake, S., Bullock, J.M. and Hartley, S. 2001. Impacts of livestock grazing on lowland heathland in the UK. Engl. Nat. Res. Rep. 422: 143.
-
Letten, A.D., Keith, D.A. and Tozer, M.G. 2014. Phylogenetic and functional dissimilarity does not increase during temporal heathland succession. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281: 20142102.
-
Londo, G. 1976. The decimal scale for releves of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio 33: 61–64.
-
Lütkepohl, M. and Kaiser, T. 1997. Die Heidelandschaft. In: Naturschutzgebiet Lüneburger Heide: Geschichte, Ökologie, Naturschutz. Verlag H. M. Hausschild GmbH, Bremen. pp. 87–100.
-
Mallik, A.U. and Gimingham, C.H. 1985. Ecological effects of heather burning: II. Effects on seed germination and vegetative regeneration. J. Ecol. 73: 633–644.
-
Mayfield, M.M. and Levine, J.M. 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities: Phylogeny and coexistence. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1085–1093.
-
Mertz, P. 2002. Pflanzenwelt Mitteleuropas und der Alpen. Nikol Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & co.KG, Hamburg.
-
Moore, N.W. 1962. The heaths of dorset and their conservation. J. Ecol. 50: 369–391.
-
Nipperess, D.A. and Matsen, F.A. 2013. The mean and variance of phylogenetic diversity under rarefaction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4: 566–572.
-
Paradis, E., Claude, J. and Strimmer, K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289–290.
-
Pienkowski, M.W., Watkinson, A.R., Kerby, G., Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 523–531.
-
Piessens, K., Honnay, O. and Hermy, M. 2005. The role of fragment area and isolation in the conservation of heathland species. Biol. Conserv. 122: 61–69.
-
Pino-Bodas, R., Martín, M.P., Burgaz, A.R. and Lumbsch, H.T. 2013. Species delimitation in Cladonia (Ascomycota): a challenge to the DNA barcoding philosophy. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13: 1058–1068.
-
Poczai, P. and Hyvönen, J. 2010. Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37: 1897–1912.
-
Prieto, M. and Wedin, M. 2013. Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Ascomycota (Fungi). PLoS ONE 8, e65576.
-
R Core Team 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Rodrigues, A.S.L., Brooks, T.M. and Gaston, K.J. 2005. Integrating phylogenetic diversity in the selection of priority areas for conservation: Does it make a difference? In: Purvis, A., Gittleman, J.L. and T. Brooks. (eds.), Phylogeny and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York. pp. 101–119.
-
Rohwer, J.G., Li, J., Rudolph, B., Schmidt, S.A., Werff, H. van der and Li, H. 2009. Is Persea (Lauraceae) monophyletic? Evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Taxon 58: 1153–1167.
-
Rohwer, J.G., Moraes, P.L.R.D., Rudolph, B. and Werff, H.V.D. 2014. A phylogenetic analysis of the Cryptocarya group (Lauraceae) and relationships of Dahlgrenodendron, Sinopora, Triadodaphne, and Yasunia. Phytotaxa 158: 111–132.
-
Ronquist, F. and Hülsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
-
Schmull, M., Miadlikowska, J., Pelzer, M., Stocker-Wörgötter, E., Hofstetter, V., Fraker, E., Hodkinson, B.P., Reeb, V., Kukwa, M., Lumbsch, H.T., et al. 2011. Phylogenetic affiliations of members of the heterogeneous lichen-forming fungi of the genus Lecidea sensu Zahlbruckner (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota). Mycologia 103: 983–1003.
-
Stenroos, S. 2002. Phylogeny of the genus Cladonia s.lat. (Cladoniaceae, Ascomycetes) inferred from molecular, morphological, and chemical data. Cladistics 18: 237–278.
-
Stevens, P.F. 2001. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 13, October 2014.
-
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 2725–2729.
-
Vamosi, S.M., Heard, S.B., Vamosi, J.C. and Webb, C.O. 2009. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 18: 572–592.
-
Verdú, M. and Pausas, J.G. 2007. Fire drives phylogenetic clustering in Mediterranean Basin woody plant communities. J. Ecol. 95: 1316–1323.
-
Webb, C.O. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 156: 145–155.
-
Webb, N.R. 1998. The traditional management of European heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 987–990.
-
Webb, N.R. and Vermaat, A.H. 1990. Changes in vegetational diversity on remnant heathland fragments. Biol. Conserv. 53: 253–264.
-
Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A. and Donoghue, M.J. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 475–505.
-
Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D. and Kembel, S.W. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 2098–2100.
-
Winter, M., Devictor, V. and Schweiger, O. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 199–204.
To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
Manuscript Submission: HERE
For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.
| Community Ecology | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | A4 |
| Year of Foundation |
2000 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
3 |
| Founder | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Founder's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245 |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó Springer Nature Switzerland AG |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 1585-8553 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2756 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2024 | 141 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2024 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2024 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2024 | 103 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2024 | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.