Authors:
P. Biella University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic v.v.i., České Budějovice, Czech Republic
University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Search for other papers by P. Biella in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Ollerton University of Northampton, Avenue Campus, Northampton, NN2 6JD, UK

Search for other papers by J. Ollerton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Barcella University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Search for other papers by M. Barcella in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
S. Assini University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Search for other papers by S. Assini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Conservation of species is often focused either only on those that are endangered, or on maximising the number recorded on species lists. However, species share space and time with others, thus interacting and building frameworks of relationships that can be unravelled by community-level network analysis. It is these relationships that ultimately drive ecosystem function via the transfer of energy and nutrients. However interactions are rarely considered in conservation planning. Network analysis can be used to detect key species (“hubs”) that play an important role in cohesiveness of networks. We applied this approach to plant-pollinator communities on two montane Northern Apennine grasslands, paying special attention to the modules and the identity of hubs. We performed season-wide sampling and then focused the network analyses on time units consistent with plant phenology. After testing for significance of modules, only some modules were found to be significantly segregated from others. Thus, networks were organized around a structured core of modules with a set of companion species that were not organized into compartments. Using a network approach we obtained a list of important plant and pollinator species, including three Network Hubs of utmost importance, and other hubs of particular biogeographical interest. By having a lot of links and high partner diversity, hubs should convey stability to networks. Due to their role in the networks, taking into account such key species when considering the management of sites could help to preserve the greatest number of interactions and thus support many other species.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Material
  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Oct 2024 51 0 0
Nov 2024 29 0 0
Dec 2024 19 0 0
Jan 2025 19 0 0
Feb 2025 24 0 0
Mar 2025 40 0 0
Apr 2025 0 0 0