View More View Less
  • 1 University of Otago Botany Department Dunedin
  • | 2 Climate Impacts Group, Plant Ecology, Lund University Department of Ecology, Ekologihuset 223 62 Lund
Restricted access

Testing the ecological communities of different areas for convergence, in the sense of remarkable similarity in the characteristics of the species present, has a long history in biology. Recently, numerical methods have been developed for comparing community-level convergence to an explicit null model. No valid method has been known for testing the significance of texture convergence when the species are weighted by their abundance. Six combinations of method variants are tested on random datasets. A valid P value (i. e., with P . 0. 05 in no more than 5% of the cases) is obtained so long as for each species the distribution of abundances across sites is retained, and only the assignment of character values is randomised. Further restriction is not necessary for obtaining a valid P value, and can lead to a test with considerably lower power to detect convergence. The power of the test with free matching of character values to species is only moderate with 10 sites, though improved with larger numbers of sites. Previous methods for detecting texture convergence have examined convergence only in the mean value for any character. It is possible that the external environment might be reflected in the community mean of a character, leaving the imprint of convergence on the shape of the distribution, rather than the mean. A method for comparing the shape is described, and it is shown that the null model is valid also for this test statistic.  

  • Gonzalez, L. and B.F.J. Manly. 1998. Analysis of variance by randomization with small data sets. Environmetrics 9: 53-65.

    'Analysis of variance by randomization with small data sets ' () 9 Environmetrics : 53 -65.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Barbour, M.G. and R.A. Minnich. 1990. The myth of chaparral convergence. Israel J. Bot. 39: 453-463.

    'The myth of chaparral convergence ' () 39 Israel J. Bot. : 453 -463.

  • Hildebrand, M. 1974. Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. Wiley, New York, USA.

    Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. , ().

  • Barkman, J.J. 1979. The investigation of vegetation texture and structure. In: M.J.A. Werger (ed.), The Study of Vegetation. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 123-160.

    The investigation of vegetation texture and structure , () 123 -160.

  • Blondel, J., F. Vuilleumier, L.F. Marcus and E. Terouanne. 1984. Is there ecomorphological convergence among mediterranean bird communities of Chile, California, and France? Evol. Biol. 18: 141-213.

    'Is there ecomorphological convergence among mediterranean bird communities of Chile, California, and France ' () 18 Evol. Biol. : 141 -213.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Campbell, B.M. and M.J.A. Werger. 1988. Plant form in the mountains of the Cape, South Africa. J. Ecol. 76: 637-653.

    'Plant form in the mountains of the Cape, South Africa ' () 76 J. Ecol. : 637 -653.

  • Connor E. F. and D. Simberloff. 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132-1140.

    'The assembly of species communities: chance or competition ' () 60 Ecology : 1132 -1140.

  • Keeley, J.E. 1992. A Californian's view of fynbos. In: R. M. Cowling (ed.), The Ecology of Fynbos, Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 372-388.

    A Californian's view of fynbos , () 372 -388.

  • Manly, B.F.J. 1996. Are there clumps in body-size distributions? Ecology 77: 81-86.

    'Are there clumps in body-size distributions ' () 77 Ecology : 81 -86.

  • Pillar, V.D. 1996. A randomization-based solution for vegetation classification and homogeneity testing. Coenoses 11: 29-36.

    'A randomization-based solution for vegetation classification and homogeneity testing ' () 11 Coenoses : 29 -36.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pillar, V.D. 1999. On the identification of optimal plant functional types.J. Veg. Sci. 10: 631-640.

    'On the identification of optimal plant functional types ' () 10 J. Veg. Sci. : 631 -640.

  • Schluter, D. 1986. Tests for similarity and convergence of finch communities. Ecology 67: 1073-1085.

    'Tests for similarity and convergence of finch communities ' () 67 Ecology : 1073 -1085.

  • Schluter, D. 1990. Species-for-species matching. Am. Nat. 136: 560-568.

    'Species-for-species matching ' () 136 Am. Nat. : 560 -568.

  • Smith, B., S.H. Moore, P.B. Grove, N.S. Harris, S. Mann and J.B. Wilson. 1994. Vegetation texture as an approach to community structure: community-level convergence in a New Zealand temperate rainforest. N.Z. J. Ecol. 18: 41-50.

    'Vegetation texture as an approach to community structure: community-level convergence in a New Zealand temperate rainforest ' () 18 N.Z. J. Ecol. : 41 -50.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tokeshi, M. 1986. Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 55: 491-506

    'Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community ' () 55 J. Anim. Ecol. : 491 -506.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Watkins, A.J. and J.B. Wilson. 1994. Plant community structure, and its relation to the vertical complexity of communities: dominance/diversity and spatial rank consistency. Oikos 70: 91-98.

    'Plant community structure, and its relation to the vertical complexity of communities: dominance/diversity and spatial rank consistency ' () 70 Oikos : 91 -98.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wiens, J.A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vol. 1. Foundations and Patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vol. 1. Foundations and Patterns. , ().

  • Wiens, J.A. 1991. Ecomorphological comparisons of the shrub-desert avifaunas of Australia and North America. Oikos 60: 55-63.

    'Ecomorphological comparisons of the shrub-desert avifaunas of Australia and North America ' () 60 Oikos : 55 -63.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wilson, J.B. 1987 Methods for detecting non-randomness in species co-occurrences: a contribution. Oecologia 73: 579-582.

    'Methods for detecting non-randomness in species co-occurrences: a contribution ' () 73 Oecologia : 579 -582.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wilson, J.B. 1991. Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 35-46.

    'Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves ' () 2 J. Veg. Sci. : 35 -46.

  • Wilson, J.B. 1999. Assembly rules in plant communities. In: E. Weiher and P.A. Keddy (eds.), The Search for Assembly Rules in Ecological Communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 130-164.

    Assembly rules in plant communities , () 130 -164.

  • Wilson, J.B., Agnew, A.D.Q. and Partridge, T.R. 1994. Carr texture in Britain and New Zealand: Community convergence compared with a null model. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 109-116.

    'Carr texture in Britain and New Zealand: Community convergence compared with a null model ' () 5 J. Veg. Sci : 109 -116.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Young, Z. 1981. The Life of Vertebrates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    The Life of Vertebrates. , ().

  • Simberloff, D. 1976. Trophic structure determination and equilibrium in an arthropod community. Ecology 57: 395-398

    'Trophic structure determination and equilibrium in an arthropod community ' () 57 Ecology : 395 -398.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wilson, J.B. 1995. Null models for assembly rules: the Jack Horner effect is more insidious than the Narcissus effect. Oikos 72: 139-143.

    'Null models for assembly rules: the Jack Horner effect is more insidious than the Narcissus effect ' () 72 Oikos : 139 -143.

    • Search Google Scholar

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)