View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Biology, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
  • | 2 Department of Biology, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
  • | 3 Department of Biology, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
Restricted access

The relationship between productivity and species diversity was investigated at the quadrat level for three old-field plant communities that varied in time since the last major disturbance from cultivation. A positive relationship between productivity (estimated by above-ground dry biomass) and the species richness component of diversity was detected only for quadrats from the most recently disturbed community. The communities that experienced longer post-disturbance time showed no significant relationship between productivity and species richness. Quadrat productivity, however, was negatively related to the species evenness component of diversity in all three communities, i.e., regardless of time since disturbance. Furthermore, analyses of covariance using log biomass, species richness and species evenness as response variables, log soil nitrate concentration as a covariate and time since disturbance as a factor revealed that residual log biomass was significantly negatively correlated with residual species evenness, but was not significantly correlated with residual species richness. These results support the view that the productivity of plots within natural vegetation is related more predictably to the relative composition of species (reflected by evenness) than to the number of species present, especially as succession progresses.

  • Weiher, E. and P. A. Keddy. 1999. Relative abundance and evenness patterns along diversity and biomass gradients. Oikos 87:355-361.

    'Relative abundance and evenness patterns along diversity and biomass gradients. ' () 87 Oikos : 355 -361.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wilsey, B. J. and C. Potvin. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: importance of species evenness in an old field. Ecology 81:887-892.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: importance of species evenness in an old field. ' () 81 Ecology : 887 -892.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Loreau, M. and A. Hector. 2001a. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72-76

    'Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. ' () 412 Nature : 72 -76.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Loreau, M. and A. Hector. 2001b. Erratum: partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 413:548.

    'Erratum: partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. ' () 413 Nature : 548.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Naeem, S. and S. Li. 1997. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507-509.

    'Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. ' () 390 Nature : 507 -509.

  • Naeem, S. and S. Li. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature 394:30.

    'A more reliable design for biodiversity study? ' () 394 Nature : 30.

  • Diamond, J. 1986. Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiment, and natural experiments. In, Diamond, J. and T. J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology. Harper and Row, New York. pp. 3-22.

    Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiment, and natural experiments. , () 3 -22.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hector, A. 1998. The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos 82:597-599.

    'The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. ' () 82 Oikos : 597 -599.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Drobner, U., J. Bibby, B. Smith, and J. B. Wilson. 1998. The relation between community biomass and evenness: what does community theory predict, and can these predictions be tested? Oikos 82:295-302.

    'The relation between community biomass and evenness: what does community theory predict, and can these predictions be tested? ' () 82 Oikos : 295 -302.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wilson, J. B. 1999. Assembly rules in plant communities. In: Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. (eds), Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. Cambridge University Press, pp. 130-164.

    Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. , () 130 -164.

  • Wardle, D. A., O. Zackrisson, G. Hornberg and C. Gallet. 1997c. Biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Science 278:1867-1869.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem properties. ' () 278 Science : 1867 -1869.

  • Emmerson, M. C. and D. G. Raffaelli. 2000. Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations. Oikos 91:195-203

    'Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations. ' () 91 Oikos : 195 -203.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Naeem, S., J. L. Thompson, S. P. Lawler, J. H. Lawton and R. M. Woodfin. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:734-737.

    'Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. ' () 368 Nature : 734 -737.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chapin Ill, F. S., O. E. Sala, I. C. Burke, J. P. Grime, D. H. Hooper, W. K. Lauenroth, A. Lombard, H. A. Mooney, A. R. Mosier, S. Naeem, S. W. Pacala, J. Roy, W. L. Steffan, and D. Tilman. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity. BioScience 48:45-52.

    'Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity. ' () 48 BioScience : 45 -52.

  • Naeem, S., K. Hakansson, J. H. Lawton, M. J. Crawley and J. L. Thompson. 1996. Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. Oikos 76:259-264.

    'Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. ' () 76 Oikos : 259 -264.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rusch, G. M. and M. Oesterheld. 1997. Relationship between productivity, and species and functional group diversity in grazed and non-grazed Pampas grassland. Oikos 78:519-526

    'Relationship between productivity, and species and functional group diversity in grazed and non-grazed Pampas grassland. ' () 78 Oikos : 519 -526.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Naeem, S., F. S. Chapin III, R. Costanza, P. R. Ehrlich, F. B. Golley, D. U. Hooper, J. H. Lawton, R. V. O'Neill, H. A. Mooney, O. E. Sala, A. J. Symstad and D. Tilman. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. Issues in Ecology 4:1-11.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. ' () 4 Issues in Ecology : 1 -11.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Cons. Biol. 6:18-23.

    'Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. ' () 6 Cons. Biol. : 18 -23.

  • Wardle, D. A. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature 394:30.

    'A more reliable design for biodiversity study? ' () 394 Nature : 30.

  • Schlapfer, F., B. Schmid and I. Seidl. 1999. Expert estimates about the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 84:346-352.

    'Expert estimates about the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. ' () 84 Oikos : 346 -352.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Schwartz, M. W., C. A. Brigham, J. D. Hoeksema, K. G. Lyons, M. H. Mills and P. J. van Mantgem. 2000. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation biology. Oecologia 122:297-305.

    'Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation biology. ' () 122 Oecologia : 297 -305.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Smith, B. and J. B. Wilson. 1996. A consumer's guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70-82.

    'A consumer's guide to evenness indices. ' () 76 Oikos : 70 -82.

  • Tilman, D., D. Wedin and J. Knops. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718-120.

    'Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. ' () 379 Nature : 718 -120.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tilman, D., C. L. Lehman and K. T. Thompson. 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 94:1857-1861.

    'Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. ' () 94 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. : 1857 -1861.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Špačková, I. and J. LepŠ. 2001. Procedure for separating the selection effects in diversity-productivity relationship. Ecology Letters 4:585-594.

    'Procedure for separating the selection effects in diversity-productivity relationship. ' () 4 Ecology Letters : 585 -594.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tilman, D. 1990. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. In: J. B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds.), Perpectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 117-141.

    Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. , () 117 -141.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tilman, D. 1997. Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition. Oikos 80:185.

    'Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition. ' () 80 Oikos : 185.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Troumbis, A.Y. and D. Memtsas. 2000. Observational evidence that diversity may increase productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. Oecologia 125:101-108.

    'Observational evidence that diversity may increase productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. ' () 125 Oecologia : 101 -108.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • van der Heijden, M. G. A. 1999. "Sampling effect", a problem in biodiversity manipulation? A reply to David A. Wardle. Oikos 87:408-410.

    '"Sampling effect", a problem in biodiversity manipulation? A reply to David A. Wardle. ' () 87 Oikos : 408 -410.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Waide, R. B., M. R. Willig, C. F. Steiner, G. Mittelbach, L. Gough, S. I. Dodson, G. P. Juday and R. Parmenter. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:257-300.

    'The relationship between productivity and species richness. ' () 30 Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. : 257 -300.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wardle, D. A. 1999. Is "sampling effect" a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403-407.

    'Is "sampling effect" a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? ' () 87 Oikos : 403 -407.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wardle, D.A. 2001. No observational evidence for diversity enhancing productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. Oecologia 129:620-621.

    'No observational evidence for diversity enhancing productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. ' () 129 Oecologia : 620 -621.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wardle, D. A., K. I. Bonner and K. S. Nicholson. 1997a. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247-258.

    'Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. ' () 79 Oikos : 247 -258.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wardle, D. A., O. Zackrisson, G. Hornberg and C. Gallet. 1997b. The influence of island area on ecosystem properties. Science 277:1296-1299.

    'The influence of island area on ecosystem properties. ' () 277 Science : 1296 -1299.

  • Epp, G. A. and L. W. Aarssen. 1989. Predicting vegetation patterns from attributes of plant growth in grassland species. Can. J. Bot. 67:2953-2959.

    'Predicting vegetation patterns from attributes of plant growth in grassland species. ' () 67 Can. J. Bot : 2953 -2959.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hector, A., B. Schmid, C. Beierkuhnlein, M. C. Caldeira, M. Diemer, P. G. Dimitrakopoulos, J. A. Finn, J. Freitas, P. S. Giller, J. Good, R. Harris, P. Hogberg, K. Huss-Danell, J. Joshi, A. Jumpponen, A Korner, P. W. Leadley, M. Loreau, A. Minns, C. P. H Mulder, G. O'Donovan, S. J. Otway, J. S. Pereira, A. Prinz, D. J. Read, M. Scherer-Lorenzen, E. -D. Schulze, A. -S. D. Siamantziouras, E. M. Spehn, A. C. Terry, A. Y. Troumbis, F. I. Woodward, S. Yachi and J. H. Lawton. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123-1127.

    'Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. ' () 286 Science : 1123 -1127.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Aarssen, L. W. 1997. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183-184.

    'High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? ' () 80 Oikos : 183 -184.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Garnier, E., M. -L. Navas, M. P. Austin, J. M. Lilley, and R. M. Gifford. 1997. A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures. Acta Oecologica 18:657-670.

    'A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures. ' () 18 Acta Oecologica : 657 -670.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Grime, J. P. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277:1260-1261.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. ' () 277 Science : 1260 -1261.

  • Grime, J. P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902-910.

    'Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. ' () 86 J. Ecol. : 902 -910.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Huston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449-460.

    'Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. ' () 110 Oecologia : 449 -460.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jolliffe, P. A, 1997. Are mixed populations of plant species more productive than pure stands? Oikos 80:595-602.

    'Are mixed populations of plant species more productive than pure stands? ' () 80 Oikos : 595 -602.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kenkel, N. C., D. A. Peltzer, D. Baluta and D. Pirie. 2000. Increasing plant diversity does not influence productivity: empirical evidence and potential mechanisms. Community Ecology 1:165-170.

    'Increasing plant diversity does not influence productivity: empirical evidence and potential mechanisms. ' () 1 Community Ecology : 165 -170.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Loreau, M. 1998a. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 95:5632-5636.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. ' () 95 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. : 5632 -5636.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Huston, M. A., L. W. Aarssen, M. P. Austin, B. S. Cade, J. D. Fridley, E. Garnier, J. P. Grime, J. Hodgeson, W. K. Lauenroth, K. Thompson, J. H. Vandermeer and D. Wardle. 2000. No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255.

    'No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. ' () 289 Science : 1255.

  • Loreau, M. 1998b. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82:600-602.

    'Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. ' () 82 Oikos : 600 -602.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Loreau, M. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3-17.

    'Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. ' () 91 Oikos : 3 -17.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Aarssen, L. W. 2001. On correlations and causations between productivity and species richness in vegetation: predictions from habitat attributes. Basic and Applied Ecology 2:105-114.

    'On correlations and causations between productivity and species richness in vegetation: predictions from habitat attributes. ' () 2 Basic and Applied Ecology : 105 -114.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Aarssen, L. W., R. A. Laird and J. Pither. 2003. Is the productivity of vegetation plots higher or lower when there are more species? Variable predictions from interaction of the 'sampling effect' and 'competitive dominance effect' on the habitat templet. Oikos (in press).

    'Is the productivity of vegetation plots higher or lower when there are more species? Variable predictions from interaction of the 'sampling effect' and 'competitive dominance effect' on the habitat templet. ' () Oikos .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hector, A., J. Joshi, S.P. Lawler, E.M. Spehn and A. Wilby. 2001. Conservation implications of the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oecologia 129:624-628.

    'Conservation implications of the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. ' () 129 Oecologia : 624 -628.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hooper, D. U. 1998. The role of complementarity and composition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79:704-719.

    'The role of complementarity and composition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. ' () 79 Ecology : 704 -719.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hooper, D. U. and P. M. Vitousek. 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302-1305.

    'The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. ' () 277 Science : 1302 -1305.

    • Search Google Scholar

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)