View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Plant Biology, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • | 2 Department of Plant Biology, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • | 3 Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universita di Roma „La Sapienza” Piazzale Aldo Moro 5., I-00185 Roma, Italy
  • | 4 Department of Plant Biology, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • | 5 Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universita di Roma „La Sapienza” Piazzale Aldo Moro 5., I-00185 Roma, Italy
Restricted access

We propose a simple mathematical framework to define consistently the environmental quality of a given landscape based on the relative abundances of the constituting land cover classes. Unlike traditional diversity measures, the new method does not evaluate the simple dispersion of the relative abundances of land cover classes, but assigns a weight to each land cover class according to the rank along a gradient of environmental quality. To clarify the ideas discussed, the method is illustrated with data from a pilot study to assess landscape changes in an Italian periurban area over the last 50 years.

  • Gulinck, H., M. Mugica, J.V. de Lucio and J.A. Atauri. 2001. A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain). Landscape Urban Plan. 55,257-270.

    'A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain) ' () 55 Landscape Urban Plan. : 257 -270.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Arrigoni P.V. and B. Foggi. 1988. Il paesaggio vegetale delle colline di Lucignano (Prov. di Firenze). Webbia 42: 285-304.

    'Il paesaggio vegetale delle colline di Lucignano (Prov. di Firenze) ' () 42 Webbia : 285 -304.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Björklund J., K.E. Limburg and T. Rydberg. 1999. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 29:269-291.

    'Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden ' () 29 Ecol. Econ. : 269 -291.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Blasi, C. 1994. Fitoclimatologia del Lazio. Fitosociologia 27: 151-175.

    'Fitoclimatologia del Lazio ' () 27 Fitosociologia : 151 -175.

  • Izsák, J. and L. Papp. 1998. On diversity and concentration indices in ecology. Coenoses 13: 29-32.

    'On diversity and concentration indices in ecology ' () 13 Coenoses : 29 -32.

  • Kienast, F. 1993. Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System - a methodological outline. Landscape Ecol. 8: 103-118.

    'Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System - a methodological outline ' () 8 Landscape Ecol. : 103 -118.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Maasoumi, E. 1986. The measurement and decomposition of multidimensional inequality. Econometrica 54: 991-997.

    'The measurement and decomposition of multidimensional inequality ' () 54 Econometrica : 991 -997.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Matson, W.J. Parton, A.G. Power and M.J. Swift. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504-509.

    'Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties ' () 277 Science : 504 -509.

  • McGarigal, K. and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.

    FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351 , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • McKenzie, H., D.E. Hyatt and V.J. McDonald (eds). 1992. Ecological Indicators. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Ecological Indicators. , ().

  • Mosler, K. 2001. Multidimensional indices and orders of diversity. Community Ecol. 2: 137-144.

    'Multidimensional indices and orders of diversity ' () 2 Community Ecol. : 137 -144.

  • Nijssen, D., R. Rousseau and P. VanHecke. 1998. The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses 13: 33-38.

    'The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness ' () 13 Coenoses : 33 -38.

  • Odum, E. P. 1993. Ecology and our Endangered Life Support System. Synauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Ecology and our Endangered Life Support System. , ().

  • Ehrlich, PR. and A.H. Ehrlich. 1992. The value of biodiversity. Ambio 21: 219-226.

    'The value of biodiversity ' () 21 Ambio : 219 -226.

  • Daily, G.C. (ed.). 1997. Nature's Services. Social Dependence on Natural Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Nature's Services. Social Dependence on Natural Ecosystem Services. , ().

  • Gosselin, F. 2001. Lorenz partial order: the best known logical framework to define evenness indices. Community Ecol. 2: 197-207.

    'Lorenz partial order: the best known logical framework to define evenness indices ' () 2 Community Ecol. : 197 -207.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Griffith, J.A. and C.T. Hunsaker. 1994. Ecosystem monitoring and ecological indicators: an annotated bibliography. EPA/620/R-94/021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

    Ecosystem monitoring and ecological indicators: an annotated bibliography. EPA/620/R-94/021 , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Paoletti, M.G., D. Pimentel, B.R. Stinner and D. Stinner. 1992. Agroecosystem biodiversity: matching production and conservation biology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 3-24.

    'Agroecosystem biodiversity: matching production and conservation biology ' () 40 Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. : 3 -24.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie. 1979. An overview of diversity. In: J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taillie (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD, pp. 3-27.

    An overview of diversity , () 3 -27.

  • Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77: 548-567.

    'Diversity as a concept and its measurement ' () 77 J. Am. Stat. Ass. : 548 -567.

  • Taillie, C. 1979. Species equitability: a comparative approach. In: J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taillie (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD, pp. 51-62.

    Species equitability: a comparative approach , () 51 -62.

  • Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283-290.

    'Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering ' () 6 J. Veg. Sci. : 283 -290.

  • Vitousek, P.M., P.R. Ehrlich, A.H. Ehrlich and P.A. Matson. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36: 368-373.

    'Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis ' () 36 BioScience : 368 -373.

  • Weinstoerffer, J. and P. Girardin. 2000. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol. Model. 130: 95-109.

    'Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator ' () 130 Ecol. Model. : 95 -109.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pizzolotto, R. and P. Brandmayr. 1996. An index to evaluate landscape conservation state based on land-use pattern analysis and geographic information system techniques. Coenoses 11: 37-44.

    'An index to evaluate landscape conservation state based on land-use pattern analysis and geographic information system techniques ' () 11 Coenoses : 37 -44.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Ricotta C, M.L. Carranza, G.C. Avena and C. Blasi. 2002. Is potential natural vegetation distribution a meaningful alternative to neutral landscape models? Applied Veg. Sci. 5: 271-275.

    'Is potential natural vegetation distribution a meaningful alternative to neutral landscape models ' () 5 Applied Veg. Sci. : 271 -275.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rousseau, R., P. VanHecke, D. Nijssen and J. Bogaert. 1999. The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 6: 211-23.

    'The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environ ' () 6 Ecol. Stat. : 211 -23.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Briggs, D J. and J. France. 1980. Landscape evaluation: A comparative study. J. Environ. Manage. 10: 263-275.

    'Landscape evaluation: A comparative study ' () 10 J. Environ. Manage. : 263 -275.

  • Campaiola, F., A. Pacini and C. Ricotta. 2001. Analisi delle trasformazioni del mosaico ambientale nel comune di Ariccia mediante l'impiego di indici topologici. Monti e Boschi 52(3/4): 9-12.

    'Analisi delle trasformazioni del mosaico ambientale nel comune di Ariccia mediante l'impiego di indici topologici ' () 52 Monti e Boschi : 9 -12.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Costanza, R, R. d'Arge, R. deGroot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, Shahid Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.

    'The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital ' () 387 Nature : 253 -260.

    • Search Google Scholar

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)