This study was carried out to compare composition, density and diversity of species between dryland and irrigated agroecosystems and between agroecosystems and the marginal grassland ecosystem in dry tropics. Main management characteristics of these ecosystems are: (1) Dryland cropping, low fertilizer input, rainfed (no irrigation) and seed sown rice; (2) Irrigated cropping, high fertilizer, water (irrigation) inputs, flooded rice by transplanting; (3) Grassland, post-rainy season herbage removal and light grazing. All ecosystems showed comparable number (12-14) of species in winter, but in the rainy season higher number of species (21) were recorded in the grassland ecosystem. The species composition of the grassland was entirely different from both agroecosystems (similarity <1%). Dryland and irrigated agroecosystems showed only 25% and 38% similarity with each other during winter and rainy cropping seasons, respectively. Occurrence of few grasses (e.g., Cynodon dactylon, Dichanthium annulatum and Sporobolus diander) in the agroecosystems depends on the propagules dispersed from the marginal grassland. The change from dryland to irrigated agroecosystem involved elimination of 4-5 species during both cropping seasons and simultaneous recruitment of 2 new species in winter and 6 species in rainy season. In both agroecosystems, forbs (C_ type) dominated over graminoids (C_ type) during winter season but the dominance was reversed during the warm, rainy season. During winter some forbs were abundant in both agroecosystems due to their tolerance to widely varying moisture conditions (e.g.,Chenopodium album), others were dominant in either drier soil conditions (e.g., Anagallis arvensis in dryland) or wet conditions (e.g., Melilotus indica and Phalaris minor in irrigated). Higher species diversity occurred in the grassland relative to both agroecosystems. The seasonal trends of species diversity and species evenness were broadly similar in both agroecosystems but irrigated agroecosystem exhibited relatively higher species diversity. The changes in species composition and species diversity in agroecosystems are mainly attributed to differences in water management. The water management in irrigated agroecosystem tends to reduce weed diversity but leads to the dominance of some potentially noxious weeds (e.g., Phalaris minor).
Susana, S. A., E.B. Fuente, C.M. Ghersa and R.J.C. Leon. 2001. Weed community as an indicator of summer crop yield and site quality. Agron. J. 93: 524-530.
'Weed community as an indicator of summer crop yield and site quality.' () 93Agron. J.: 524-530.
Weed community as an indicator of summer crop yield and site quality.Agron. J.93524530)| false
Swift, M. J. and J.M. Anderson. 1993. Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. In: Schulze, E. D. and Mooney, H. A. (eds.) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 15-41.
Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems., () 15-41.
Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems.1541)| false
Vandermeer, J., D. Lawrence, A. Symstad and S. Hobbie. 2002. Effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning in managed ecosystems. In: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. (eds.), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 221-223.
Effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning in managed ecosystems., () 221-223.
Effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning in managed ecosystems.221223)| false
Dieleman, J. A., D.A. Mortensen, D.D. Buhler, C.A. Canbardella and T.B. Moorman. 2000. Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis. Weed Sci. 48:567-575.
'Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis.' () 48Weed Sci.: 567-575.
Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis.Weed Sci.48567575)| false
Waldhardt, R., D. Simmering and H. Albrecht. 2003. Floristic diversity at the habitat scale in agricultural landscapes of central Europe-summary, conclusions and perspectives. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 79-85.
'Floristic diversity at the habitat scale in agricultural landscapes of central Europe-summary, conclusions and perspectives.' () 98Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.: 79-85.
Floristic diversity at the habitat scale in agricultural landscapes of central Europe-summary, conclusions and perspectives.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.987985)| false
Karssen, C. M. and H.W.M. Hilhorst. 1992. Effect of chemical environment on seed germination. In: Fenner, M. (ed.). Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration Plant Communities. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 327-348.
Effect of chemical environment on seed germination., () 327-348.
Effect of chemical environment on seed germination.327348)| false
Misra, J., H.N. Pandey, R.S. Tripathi and U.K. Sahoo. 1995. Dynamics of buried seed populations and seedling cohorts of two dominant weeds in a hill agroecosystem of the humid subtropics of India. Res. Population Ecol. 37: 1-7.
'Dynamics of buried seed populations and seedling cohorts of two dominant weeds in a hill agroecosystem of the humid subtropics of India.' () 37Res. Population Ecol.: 1-7.
Dynamics of buried seed populations and seedling cohorts of two dominant weeds in a hill agroecosystem of the humid subtropics of India.Res. Population Ecol.3717)| false
Moody, K. 1996. Weed community dynamics in rice fields. In: Nay-lor, R. (ed.), Herbicides in Asian Rice: Transitions in Weed Management. Palo Alto California: Institute for International Studies, Stanford University and Manila (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, pp. 27-36.
Weed community dynamics in rice fields., () 27-36.
Weed community dynamics in rice fields.2736)| false
Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)