View More View Less
  • 1 124 Land and Water Research Bldg., The Pennsylvania State University Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA.
  • | 2 School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State University Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA
  • | 3 Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA
Restricted access

With contemporary emphasis on sustainability and ecosystem-oriented natural resources management, ecological mapping at landscape scales is becoming increasingly important as a framework for environmental planning, monitoring and assessment. This is especially so when the terrain has substantial variability in elevation and steep slopes. Recognizing the importance of hydrology in landscape dynamics, we base an ecological mapping approach on topological features of terrain from a hydrologic and habitat perspective. This approach emphasizes convexities and concavities of topography as caplands and confluent cuplands, respectively. A concept of coherent convex contours provides an operational basis for determining capland components, with cupland components being predominantly concave contributing areas for higher-order streams. Scaling sequences of subdivisions give progressive partitioning down to sizes of units that serve practical purposes of natural resource management. An innovation of dome domains and terrain tiers is introduced for more detailed topological treatment of land forms.

  • Driscoll, R. S., D. L. Merkel, D. L. Radloff, D. E. Snyder and J. S. Hagihara. 1984. An ecological land classification framework for the United States. Wash., D.C.: USDA Forest Service, Misc. Pub. 1439.

    An ecological land classification framework for the United States. , () 1439.

  • ECOMAP. 1993. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. Wash., D.C.: USDA Forest Service, unpublished administrative paper.

    ECOMAP , ().

  • European Environment Agency. 2005. CORINE biotypes - the design, compilation and use of an inventory of sites of major importance for nature conservation in the European Community. Kongens Nytorv 6, DK-1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

    European Environment Agency. , () DK -1050.

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. , ().

  • Imhof, J. G., J. Fitzgibbon and W. K. Annable. 1996. A hierarchical evaluation system for watershed ecosystems for fish habitat. Canadian Journal of Fishes and Aquatic Sciences 53 (Supplement 1): 312-326.

    'A hierarchical evaluation system for watershed ecosystems for fish habitat. ' () 53 Canadian Journal of Fishes and Aquatic Sciences : 312 -326.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jensen, M. E. and P. S. Bourgeron (eds.) 1994. Ecosystem management: principles and applications, Vol. II. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Ecosystem management: principles and applications, Vol. II. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318 , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Allen, J. D. and L. B. Johnson. 1997. Catchment-scale analyses of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:107-111.

    'Catchment-scale analyses of aquatic ecosystems. ' () 37 Freshwater Biology : 107 -111.

  • Bailey, R.G. 1995. Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States. Wash., D.C.: USDA, Forest Service, Misc. Pub. 1391 (rev.).

    Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States. , ().

  • Bourgeron, P. S., H. C. Humphries, R. L. DeVelice and M. E. Jensen. 1994. Ecological theory in relation to landscape and ecosystem characterization. In: Jensen, M. E. and P. S. Bourgeron (eds.), Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications Vol. II. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. pp. 58-72

    Ecological theory in relation to landscape and ecosystem characterization. , () 58 -72.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cole, C. A. and R. P. Brooks. 2000. Patterns of hydrology in wetlands in the Ridge and Valley Province, Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 20:428-447.

    'Patterns of hydrology in wetlands in the Ridge and Valley Province ' () 20 Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands : 428 -447.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cole, C. A., R. P. Brooks, P. W. Shaffer and M. E. Kentula. 2002. A comparison of the hydrology of wetlands in Pennsylvania and Oregon (USA) as an indicator of transferability of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) functional models between regions. Environmental Management 30: 265-278.

    'A comparison of the hydrology of wetlands in Pennsylvania and Oregon (USA) as an indicator of transferability of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) functional models between regions. ' () 30 Environmental Management : 265 -278.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Johnson, L. B. and S. H. Gage. 1997. Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosytems. Freshwater Biology 37: 113-132.

    'Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosytems. ' () 37 Freshwater Biology : 113 -132.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Küchler, A. W. 1967. Vegetation Mapping. The Ronald Press Company, New York.

    Vegetation Mapping. , ().

  • Levin, S. A. 1981. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1942-1968.

    'The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. ' () 73 Ecology : 1942 -1968.

  • Myers, W. L. 2000. Landscape scale ecological mapping of Pennsylvania forests. Research Report ER2000-2, Environmental Resources Research Institute, University Park, PA.

    Landscape scale ecological mapping of Pennsylvania forests. Research Report ER2000-2 , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Myers, W. 2005. Surface structures and tiered topography. Environmetrics 16:1-13.

    'Surface structures and tiered topography. ' () 16 Environmetrics : 1 -13.

  • Myers, W. and G. P. Patil. 2002. Echelon analysis. In: A. El-Shaarawi and W. W. Piegorsch (eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, Volume 2. Wiley, New York. pp. 583-586

    Encyclopedia of Environmetrics , () 583 -586.

  • Myers, W., G. P. Patil and K. Joly. 1997. Echelon approach to areas of concern in synoptic regional monitoring. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4:131-152.

    'Echelon approach to areas of concern in synoptic regional monitoring. ' () 4 Environmental and Ecological Statistics : 131 -152.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Myers, W, G. P. Patil, C. Taillie and D. Walrath. 2003. Synoptic environmental indicators as image analogs for landscape analysis. Community Ecology 4:205-217.

    'Synoptic environmental indicators as image analogs for landscape analysis. ' () 4 Community Ecology : 205 -217.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Noss, R. F. 1987. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation 41:11-37.

    'From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). ' () 41 Biological Conservation : 11 -37.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Richards, C., L. B. Johnson and G. E. Host. 1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53 (Supplement 1: 295-311.

    'Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. ' () 53 Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences : 295 -311.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Strahler, A. 1973. Introduction to Physical Geography. Wiley, New York. 468 p.

    Introduction to Physical Geography. , () 468.

  • Bryce, S. A. and S. E. Clarke. 1996. Landscape-level ecological regions: linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications. Environmental Management 20:297-311.

    'Landscape-level ecological regions: linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications. ' () 20 Environmental Management : 297 -311.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bryce, S. A., J. M. Omernik and D. P. Larsen. 1999. Ecoregions: a geographic framework to guide risk characterization and ecosystem management. Environmental Practice 1:141-155.

    'Ecoregions: a geographic framework to guide risk characterization and ecosystem management. ' () 1 Environmental Practice : 141 -155.

    • Search Google Scholar

Click HERE for submission guidelines.


Manuscript submission: COMEC Manuscript Submission

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Podani, János

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jordán, Ferenc

Honorary Editor(s): Orlóci, László

Editorial Board

  • Madhur Anand, CAN (forest ecology, computational ecology, and ecological complexity)
  • S. Bagella, ITA (temporal dynamics, including succession, community level patterns of species richness and diversity, experimental studies of plant, animal and microbial communities, plant communities of the Mediterranean)
  • P. Batáry, HUN (landscape ecology, agroecology, ecosystem services)
  • P. A. V. Borges, PRT (community level patterns of species richness and diversity, sampling in theory and practice)
  • A. Davis, GER (supervised learning, multitrophic interactions, food webs, multivariate analysis, ecological statistics, experimental design, fractals, parasitoids, species diversity, community assembly, ticks, biodiversity, climate change, biological networks, cranes, olfactometry, evolution)
  • Z. Elek, HUN (insect ecology, invertebrate conservation, population dynamics, especially of long-term field studies, insect sampling)
  • T. Kalapos, HUN (community level plant ecophysiology, grassland ecology, vegetation-soil relationship)
  • G. M. Kovács, HUN (microbial ecology, plant-fungus interactions, mycorrhizas)
  • W. C. Liu,TWN (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, temporal dynamics, including succession, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment)
  • L. Mucina, AUS (vegetation survey, syntaxonomy, evolutionary community ecology, assembly rules, global vegetation patterns, mediterranean ecology)
  • P. Ódor, HUN (plant communities, bryophyte ecology, numerical methods)
  • F. Rigal, FRA (island biogeography, macroecology, functional diversity, arthropod ecology)
  • D. Rocchini, ITA (biodiversity, multiple scales, spatial scales, species distribution, spatial ecology, remote sensing, ecological informatics, computational ecology)
  • F. Samu, HUN (landscape ecology, biological control, generalist predators, spiders, arthropods, conservation biology, sampling methods)
  • U. Scharler, ZAF (ecological networks, food webs, estuaries, marine, mangroves, stoichiometry, temperate, subtropical)
  • D. Schmera, HUN (aquatic communities, functional diversity, ecological theory)
  • M. Scotti, GER (community-based ecological theory and modelling issues, trophic interactions, competition, species response to the environment, ecological networks)
  • B. Tóthmérész, HUN (biodiversity, soil zoology, spatial models, macroecology, ecological modeling)
  • S. Wollrab, GER (aquatic ecology, food web dynamics, plankton ecology, predator-prey interactions)

 

Advisory Board

  • S. Bartha, HUN
  • S.L. Collins, USA
  • T. Czárán, HUN
  • E. Feoli, ITA
  • N. Kenkel, CAN
  • J. Lepš, CZE
  • S. Mazzoleni, ITA
  • Cs. Moskát, HUN
  • B. Oborny, HUN
  • M.W. Palmer, USA
  • G.P. Patil, USA
  • V. de Patta Pillar, BRA
  • C. Ricotta, ITA
  • Á. Szentesi, HUN

PODANI, JÁNOS
E-mail: podani@ludens.elte.hu


JORDÁN, FERENC
E-mail: jordan.ferenc@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Biology & Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier/Geo Abstracts
  • Science Citation Index Expanded
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)