Authors:
M. Marignani

Search for other papers by M. Marignani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Vico

Search for other papers by E. Vico in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
S. Maccherini

Search for other papers by S. Maccherini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

There is strong pressure to embrace indicators for practical goals such as nature conservation and management and to evaluate the restoration success, but the selection of appropriate indicators is not straightforward. In addition, the grain and the type of data collected and data transformation adopted can influence restoration monitoring results. In this paper, we assessed the effect of changing indicator, grain size (i.e., plot dimension) and data transformation in discriminating different mapped plant communities, relying on vascular plant composition data. We considered flora entities at different taxonomic scales of resolution as indicators and used biological forms such as life forms, growth forms and a combination of the two types, i.e., life and growth forms, as rough plant traits. We also analysed the contribution of species as indicators of the different land cover classes by performing an Indicator Species Analysis. We evaluated the effect of changing indicator (taxonomic resolution, life and growth forms and indicator species), grain size and data transformation using permutational multivariate analysis of variance on cover data expressed in percentages and as simple presence/absence. Our results demonstrated that indicators such as taxonomic resolution and biological forms have partial success in discriminating between plant communities, only for the analysis performed on presence/absence data, and that the effects of changing indicator varied depending on the data transformation used. On the contrary, indicator species are coherently effective and changing the grain size has a moderate influence on their ability to discriminate among the habitat types investigated. Hence, indicator species emerged as a promising tool in restoration monitoring. Although indicators are not supposed to substitute comprehensive surveys of vegetation, their use can help redirect considerable time, resources and expertise to more replication and better sampling design.

  • Acosta A., M.L. Carranza and F. Izzi. 2005. Combining land cover mapping with coastal dune vegetation analyses. App. Veg. Sci. 8: 133–138.

    Izzi F. , 'Combining land cover mapping with coastal dune vegetation analyses ' (2005 ) 8 App. Veg. Sci. : 133 -138 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Anderson M.J. 2001. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58:629–639

    Anderson M.J. , 'Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression ' (2001 ) 58 Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. : 629 -639 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Anderson, M.J. 2005. PERMANOVA: A FORTRAN Computer Program for Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance . Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

    Anderson M.J. , '', in PERMANOVA: A FORTRAN Computer Program for Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance , (2005 ) -.

  • Anderson, M.J., S.D., Connell, M. B. Gillanders, C.E. Diebel, W.M. Blom, J.E. Saunders and T. Landers. 2005. Relationships between taxonomic resolution and spatial scales of multivariate variation. J. Animal Ecol. 74: 636–646

    Landers T. , 'Relationships between taxonomic resolution and spatial scales of multivariate variation ' (2005 ) 74 J. Animal Ecol. : 636 -646 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Anderson, M.J. and C.J.F. ter Braak. 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 73:85–113.

    Braak C.J.F. , 'Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance ' (2003 ) 73 J. Stat. Comput. Simul. : 85 -113 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Block, W. M., A. B. Franklin, J. P. Ward, J. L. Ganey and G. C. White. 2001. Design and implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife. Restoration Ecol. 9: 293–303.

    White G. C. , 'Design and implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife ' (2001 ) 9 Restoration Ecol. : 293 -303 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Carignan V. and M. Villard. 2002. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 78: 45–61.

    Villard M. , 'Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review ' (2002 ) 78 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment : 45 -61 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Caro, T.M. and G. O’Doherty. 1999. On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 13: 805–814.

    O’Doherty G. , 'On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology ' (1999 ) 13 Conserv. Biol. : 805 -814 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chapman, M.G. and A.J. Underwood. 2000. The need for a practical scientific protocol to measure successful restoration. Wetlands (Australia). 19:28–49.

    Underwood A.J. , 'The need for a practical scientific protocol to measure successful restoration ' (2000 ) 19 Wetlands (Australia). : 28 -49 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chiarucci, A., V. De Dominicis, J. Ristori and C. Calzolari. 1995. Biancana badland vegetation in relation to morphology and soil in Orcia valley, central Italy. Phytocoenologia 25: 69–87.

    Calzolari C. , 'Biancana badland vegetation in relation to morphology and soil in Orcia valley, central Italy ' (1995 ) 25 Phytocoenologia : 69 -87 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Colwell, R. K. and J.A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series B) 345:101–118.

    Coddington J.A. , 'Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation ' (1994 ) 345 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series B) : 101 -118 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cousins, S.A.O. and R. Lindborg. 2004. Assessing changes in plant distribution patterns — indicator species vs. plant functional types. Ecol. Indicators 4:17–27.

    Lindborg R. , 'Assessing changes in plant distribution patterns — indicator species vs. plant functional types ' (2004 ) 4 Ecol. Indicators : 17 -27 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cushman, S.A. and K. McGarigal. 2004. Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 105: 117–124.

    McGarigal K. , 'Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables ' (2004 ) 105 Oikos : 117 -124 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Dufrene M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67:345–366

    Legendre P. , 'Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach ' (1997 ) 67 Ecol. Monogr. : 345 -366 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Dzwonko, Z. and S. Loster. 2007. Afunctional analysis of vegetation dynamics in abandoned and restored limestone grasslands. J. Veg. Sci. 18: 203–212.

    Loster S. , 'Afunctional analysis of vegetation dynamics in abandoned and restored limestone grasslands ' (2007 ) 18 J. Veg. Sci. : 203 -212 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • European Commission, 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora . Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/ (last access July 2008)

    '', in Council Directive 92/43/EEC of May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora , (1992 ) -.

  • Herrick, J.E., G. E. Schuman and A. Rango. 2006. Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. J. Nature Conserv. 14: 161–171.

    Rango A. , 'Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects ' (2006 ) 14 J. Nature Conserv. : 161 -171 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Holyoak, M., M.A. Leibold and R.D. Holt. 2005. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Holt R.D. , '', in Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , (2005 ) -.

  • Kreyer, D. and S. Zerbe. 2006. Short-lived tree species and their role as indicators for plant diversity in the restoration of natural forests. Restoration Ecol. 14: 137–147.

    Zerbe S. , 'Short-lived tree species and their role as indicators for plant diversity in the restoration of natural forests ' (2006 ) 14 Restoration Ecol. : 137 -147 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kenkel, N.C. and J. Podani. 1991. Plot size and estimation efficiency in plant community studies. J. Veg. Sci. 2:539–544.

    Podani J. , 'Plot size and estimation efficiency in plant community studies ' (1991 ) 2 J. Veg. Sci. : 539 -544 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lake, P.S. 2001. On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2:110–115.

    Lake P.S. , 'On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration ' (2001 ) 2 Ecol. Manage. Restor. : 110 -115 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lambeck, R. J. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11:849–856.

    Lambeck R. J. , 'Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation ' (1997 ) 11 Conserv. Biol. : 849 -856 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Landres, P.B., J. Verner and J.W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv. Biol. 2:316–328.

    Thomas J.W. , 'Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique ' (1988 ) 2 Conserv. Biol. : 316 -328 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Legendre, P. and E.D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280.

    Gallagher E.D. , 'Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data ' (2001 ) 129 Oecologia : 271 -280 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lindenmayer, D.B., C. R. Margules and D.B. Botkin. 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv. Biol. 14:941–950.

    Botkin D.B. , 'Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management ' (2000 ) 14 Conserv. Biol. : 941 -950 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Maccherini, S., A. Chiarucci and V. De Dominicis. 2000. Structure and species diversity of Bromus erectus grasslands of biancana badlands. Belg. J. Bot. 133: 3–14.

    Dominicis V. , 'Structure and species diversity of Bromus erectus grasslands of biancana badlands ' (2000 ) 133 Belg. J. Bot. : 3 -14 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Maccherini, S., M. Marignani, P. Castagnini and P. van den Brink. 2007. Multivariate analysis of the response of overgrown seminatural calcareous grasslands to restorative shrub cutting. Basic Appl. Ecol. 8:332–342.

    Brink P. , 'Multivariate analysis of the response of overgrown seminatural calcareous grasslands to restorative shrub cutting ' (2007 ) 8 Basic Appl. Ecol. : 332 -342 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Manly B.F.J. , '', in Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , (1997 ) -.

  • Marignani, M., D. Rocchini, D. Torri, A. Chiarucci and S. Maccherini. 2008. Planning restoration in a cultural landscape in Italy using an object-based approach and historical analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 84: 28–37

    Maccherini S. , 'Planning restoration in a cultural landscape in Italy using an object-based approach and historical analysis ' (2008 ) 84 Landscape and Urban Planning : 28 -37 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Marignani, M., E. Del Vico and S. Maccherini. 2007. Spatial scale and sampling size affect the concordance between remotely sensed information and plant community discrimination in restoration monitoring. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:3851–3861.

    Maccherini S. , 'Spatial scale and sampling size affect the concordance between remotely sensed information and plant community discrimination in restoration monitoring ' (2007 ) 16 Biodivers. Conserv. : 3851 -3861 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • McCune, B. and M.J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.25 . MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

    Mefford M.J. , '', in Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.25 , (1999 ) -.

  • Milledge D. R., C. L. Palmer and J. L. Nelson. 1991. ’Barometers of change’: The distribution of large owls and gliders in mountain ash forests of the Victorian central highlands and their potential as management indicators. In: D. Lunney (ed.), Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna . Royal Zoological Society of N.S.W., Sydney. pp. 55–65.

    Nelson J. L. , '', in Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna , (1991 ) -.

  • Moore, P.G. 1974. The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. III. Qualitative and quantitative ordinations, and the utility of amultivariate approach. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 16: 257–300.

    Moore P.G. , 'The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. III. Qualitative and quantitative ordinations, and the utility of amultivariate approach ' (1974 ) 16 J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. : 257 -300 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Nordén B., H. Paltto, F. Götmark and K. Wallin. 2007 Indicators of biodiversity, what do they indicate? - Lessons for conservation of cryptogams in oak-rich forest. Biol. Conserv. 135: 369–379.

    Wallin K. , 'Indicators of biodiversity, what do they indicate? - Lessons for conservation of cryptogams in oak-rich forest ' (2007 ) 135 Biol. Conserv. : 369 -379 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Noss R.F. 1990. Can we maintain biological and ecological integrity? Conserv. Biol. 4: 241–243.

    Noss R.F. , 'Can we maintain biological and ecological integrity? ' (1990 ) 4 Conserv. Biol. : 241 -243 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Noss, R.F. 1999. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. Forest Ecol. Manage. 115: 135–146.

    Noss R.F. , 'Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators ' (1999 ) 115 Forest Ecol. Manage. : 135 -146 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d’Italia . Edagricole, Bologna, Italy.

    Pignatti S. , '', in Flora d’Italia , (1982 ) -.

  • Pillar, V.D. and L. Orlóci. 1996. On randomization testing in vegetation science: multifactor comparisons of relevé groups. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 585–592

    Orlóci L. , 'On randomization testing in vegetation science: multifactor comparisons of relevé groups ' (1996 ) 7 J. Veg. Sci. : 585 -592 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pueyo, Y., C. L. Alados and C. Ferrer-Benimeli. 2006. Is the analysis of plant community structure better than common species-diversity indices for assessing the effects of livestock grazing on a Mediterranean arid ecosystem? J. Arid Environ. 64: 698–712.

    Ferrer-Benimeli C. , 'Is the analysis of plant community structure better than common species-diversity indices for assessing the effects of livestock grazing on a Mediterranean arid ecosystem? ' (2006 ) 64 J. Arid Environ. : 698 -712 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography . Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Raunkiaer C. , '', in The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography , (1934 ) -.

  • Vellend, M., P. L. Lilley and B. M. Starzomski. 2008. Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys. J. App. Ecol. 45:161–169.

    Starzomski B. M. , 'Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys ' (2008 ) 45 J. App. Ecol. : 161 -169 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Zerbe, S., I. Schmidt and J. Betzin. 2007. Indicators for plant species richness in pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) forests of Germany. Biodiv. Conserv. 16: 3301–3316.

    Betzin J. , 'Indicators for plant species richness in pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests of Germany ' (2007 ) 16 Biodiv. Conserv. : 3301 -3316 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Community Ecology
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-8553 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2756 (Online)