View More View Less
  • 1 Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
  • | 2 OFF-Biennale Budapest
Restricted access

László Beke once said: ‘we can consider conceptual art as anti-painterly, or, anti-traditionalist art. For this reason, everyone, especially painters with a good perspective, had to decide for their own how to handle this. [...] The same problem occurred again at the beginning of the 80s when the same artists, who had become conceptual, had to decide whether to begin to paint again. [...] This can be described as the great conflict between traditional and conceptual art in general.’ This conflict that I would call La querelle des conceptuels et des traditionnels is presented in this paper through the work of the Hungarian artist Gyula Konkoly and his twofold, controversial relation to the tradition of painting and to conceptual thinking. Konkoly, a classically-trained painter, who is mainly known as a pop art artist and as one of the earliest protagonists of object art in Hungary, with his Manifesto from 1971/72, ceased every kind of ‘grand art’ activity for almost two decades, until the end of the Eighties, when he returned to painting.

In most of his works from the Sixties, it was the episteme of painting that he was dealing with. On the one hand, he quoted the great masters of art history in many of his paintings, using their works in a pop art context, pairing them with abstract, hardedge surfaces. On the other hand, as a skilled painter he inserted resin imprints of his own hand on the canvases that represented the notion of craftsmanship and also the idea of the ready-made. It was the motif of the skilled hand of the artist that had to be destroyed when he got involved in conceptual art and in anti-art activities. At the first Iparterv exhibition he presented his seminal work Cage: An Academic Study (1968). In an unrealized project for a solo exhibition it was also the artist’s hand that he planned to bury. By the deconstruction of the artist’s personality and by the symbolic destruction of the artist’s hand, the symbol of the mastery of his métier, Konkoly came to the conclusion that this process, the total dematerialization of art and art object has reached its end making every kind of artistic activity pointless.

The great paradigm shift of conceptual art thus led in Konkoly’s career also to a major turning point, to an almost two-decade long pause in his work. When returning to painting at the end of the Eighties, it was again, through his skilled artist’s hand with which he resumed his meditation on medium and métier, on colours and forms, and on the episteme of painting in general. Thus the thesis of this paper is that Konkoly’s work may be seen as a continuous and – almost – lifelong meditation on painting, on its basic structures, its relationship to its tradition and to the reality it expresses, and its epistemological value when compared with other, more abstract and philosophical, conceptual modes of art making.

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

 

Senior editors

Editor-in-Chief: Lővei, Pál

Editorial Board

  • Lővei Pál (Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Beke László (Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Bodnár Szilvia (Szépművészeti Múzeum)
  • Galavics Géza (Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Marosi Ernő (Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Sisa József (Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Takács Imre (ELTE BTK Művészettörténeti Intézet)
  • Evelin Wetter (Abegg-Stiftung)

Acta Historiae Artium
P.O. Box 27
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (06 1) 375 0493
Fax: (06 1) 356 1849
E-mail: Lovei.Pal@btk.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Historical Abstracts
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR

 

 

2019  
WoS
Cites
2
CrossRef
Documents
12

 

Acta Historiae Artium
Publication Model Print Only
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge  
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency  
Further Discounts  
Subscription fee 2021 Print subscription: 501 EUR / 626 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Print subscription: 513 EUR / 640 USD
Purchase per Title  

Acta Historiae Artium
Language English
French
German
Italian
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1953
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 62
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
1
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-5830 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2608 (Online)