View More View Less
  • 1 University of Bergen, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
  • 2 Tel-Tek, Kjølnes ring 30, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
  • 3 Infometrix, Inc., 11807 N Creek Pkwy S, B-111, Bothell, WA 98011, USA
  • 4 MarqMetrix Inc., 410 W Harrison St, Ste. 200, Seattle, WA, 98119, USA
  • 5 University of Washington, 1013 NE 40th Street, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
Restricted access

The Moffatt-Swern oxidation (MSO) is a multistep, versatile, metal-free reaction by which alcohols are transformed into aldehydes and ketones. Batch MSO requires low temperatures (−70 °C) due to a highly exothermic reaction step that generates intermediates. This work shows that a rigorous investigation of the MSO in batch can be used as a stepping-stone to its implementation in a continuous-flow reactor (CFR). This work has two parts: the first part details the investigation of MSO in batch; the second covers the translation of the knowledge derived from batch to a CFR. The MSO batch reaction was performed under cryogenic conditions with real-time process monitoring. The reaction was monitored with Raman spectroscopy and could be tracked throughout the reaction. All concentrations were validated using offline high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Two configurations of the CFR were produced. Configuration 1 used the traditional batch methodology in terms of reagent addition and reaction conditions. Configuration 2 used the information derived from the batch reaction, changing the order of the reagent addition and increasing the temperature of the reactor. Real-time quantitative monitoring of chemical yield in the CFR was demonstrated via Raman spectroscopy and partial least squares (PLS) regression modeling. Reaction yield was accurately predicted every 15 s, reducing the need for chromatographic validation once the model was built. Configuration 2 was shown to perform comparably to configuration 1 at low temperature and far outperforming it at higher temperatures. Both CFR configurations performed significantly better than the batch setup in terms of temperature and yield, as was expected.

  • 1.

    Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Crouch, S. R. Principles Instrumental Analysis; Thomson Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, 2006.

  • 2.

    Watts, P.; Wiles, C. Chem. Commu. 2007, 443467.

  • 3.

    Roberge, D. M.; Ducry, L.; Bieler, N.; Cretton, P.; Zimmermann, B. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 318323.

  • 4.

    Roberge, D. M.; Bieler, N.; Mathier, M.; Eyholzer, M.; Zimmermann, B.; Barthe, P.; Guermeur, C.; Lobet, O.; Moreno, M.; Woehl, P. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31, 11551161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Roberge, D. M.; Zimmermann, B.; Rainone, F.; Gottsponer,M.; Eyholzer,M.; Kockmann, N. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 905910.

  • 6.

    Basheer, C.; Shahitha, F.; Hussain, J.; Lee, H. K.; Valiyaveettil, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 72977300.

  • 7.

    Knothe, G. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 795800.

  • 8.

    Kim, J.; Han, J.; Noh, J.; Chung, H. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007, 61, 686693.

  • 9.

    Cooper, J. B.; Wise, K. L.; Welch, W. T.; Sumner, M. B.; Wilt, B. K.; Bledsoe, R. R. Appl. Spectrosc. 1997, 51, 16131620.

  • 10.

    Workman, J. J. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 1996, 31, 251320.

  • 11.

    Santos, V. O.; Oliveira, F. C. C.; Lima, D. G.; Petry, A. C.; Garcia, E.; Suarez, P. A. Z.; Rubim, J. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 547, 188196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    De Beer, T. R. M.; Vergote, G. J.; Baeyens, W. R. G.; Remon, J. P.; Vervaet, C.; Verpoort, F. European J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 23, 355362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Vergote, G. J.;DeBeer, T. R. M.; Vervaet, C.; Remon, J. P.; Baeyens, W.R.G.; Diericx, N.; Verpoort, F. European J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 21, 479485.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Reich, G. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005, 57, 11091143.

  • 15.

    Leung, S. A.; Winkle, R. F.; Wootton, R. C. R.; deMello, A. J. Analyst 2005, 130, 4651.

  • 16.

    Mozharov, S.; Nordon, A.; Littlejohn, D.; Wiles, C.; Watts, P.; Dallin, P.; Girkin, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 36013608.

  • 17.

    Cao, E.; Sankar, M.; Firth, S.; Lam, K. F.; Bethell, D.; Knight, D. K.; Hutchings, G. J.; McMillan, P. F.; Gavriilidis, A. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 734743.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Mechtilde, S.; Eduard, S.; Andreas, F. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2006, 28, 115118.

  • 19.

    Barthus, R. C.; Poppi, R. J. Vib. Spectrosc. 2001, 26, 99105.

  • 20.

    Pelletier, M. J.; Fabiilli, M. L.; Moon, B. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007, 61, 11071115.

  • 21.

    Misra, M.; Yue, H. H.; Qin, S. J.; Ling, C. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 12811293.

  • 22.

    Chen, J.; Liu, K.-C. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 6375.

  • 23.

    Thomas, E. V. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 795A804A.

  • 24.

    Cooper, J. B.; Wise, K. L.; Groves, J.; Welch, W. T. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 40964100.

  • 25.

    Dearing, T. I.; Thompson, W. J.; Rechsteiner, C. E., Jr.; Marquardt, B. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011, 65, 181186.

  • 26.

    Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 16511660.

  • 27.

    Albright, J. D.; Goldman, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 42144216.

  • 28.

    Omura, K.; Sharma, A. K.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 957962.

  • 29.

    Tidwell, T. T. Synthesis 1990, 857870.

  • 30.

    Kawaguchi, T.; Miyata, H.; Ataka, K.; Mae, K.; Yoshida, J. I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 24132416.

  • 31.

    van der Linden, J. J.; Hilberink, P.W.; Kronenburg, C. M.; Kemperman, G. J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 911920.

  • 32.

    Roberto, M. F.; Dearing, T. I.; Branham, C. W.; Bleie, O.; Marquardt, B. J. Processes 2014, 2, 2433.

  • 33.

    Martens, H.; Næs, T. Multivariate Calibration; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1992.

  • 34.

    Wold, S.; Trygg, J.; Berglund, A.; Antti, H. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58, 131150.