Authors:
N. Boros Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for other papers by N. Boros in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Petrányi Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for other papers by A. Petrányi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Kocsis Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for other papers by D. Kocsis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
I. Bodnár Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for other papers by I. Bodnár in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The recycling of greywater for non-potable water applications, such as toilet flushing or irrigation, is a potential solution to reduce potable water consumption. To estimate the quality of raw greywater samples, we measured several physical, chemical and biological parameters. We used Hygiene Monitor test kits to determine microbiological presence in the samples. The greywater samples showed a high variability for all the measured parameters. In general, we found that greywater sources had lightly alkaline character with a considerable inorganic and organic content. About half of the analyzed samples can be characterized as highly contaminated water source with organic substance. The average BOD5 and DOC values of greywater samples were 429 ± 410 mg l−1 and 341 ± 348 mg l−1. The samples showed high similarity concerning the total plate counts parameter (range from 5 to 6 log10 cfu ml−1). Among the three greywater sources, the samples from dish sources showed the lowest coliform content (3.9 log10 cfu ml−1) and the bath samples were contaminated with coliforms to the highest degree (4.9 log10 cfu ml−1). The results of E. coli contamination tests proved that all greywater sources can be contaminated with pathogen bacteria, consequently the treatment before reuse of greywater is indispensable.

  • [1]. E. Eriksson K. Auffarth M. Henze A. Ledin 2002 Characteristics of grey wastewater Urban Water 4 85104.

  • [2]. E. Friedler R. Kovalio A. Ben-Zvi 2006 Comparative study of the microbial quality of greywater treated by three on-site treatment systems Environmental Technology 27 653663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]. M. Pidou L. Avery T. Stephenson P. Jeffrey S. A. Parsons S. Liu F. A. Memon o. B. Jeffers 2008 Chemical solutions for greywater recycling Chemosphere 71 147155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]. A. M. Dixon D. Butler A. Feweks 1999 Guidelines for greywater re-use: health issues Water and Environment Journal 13 322326.

  • [5]. E. Nolde 1999 Grey water reuse systems for toilet fl ushing in multi-storey buildings — over ten years experience in Berlin Urban Water 1 275284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]. W. Lu A. Y. T. Leung 2003 A preliminary study on potential of developing shower/laundry wastewater reclamation and reuse system Chemosphere 52 14511459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]. D. A. Okun 1997 Distributing reclaimed water through dual systems American Water Works Association Journal 89 153160.

  • [8]. H. Al-Hamaiedeh M. Bino 2010 Effect of treated grey water reuse in irrigation on soil and plants Desalination 256 115119.

  • [9]. R. Otterpohl A. Albold M. Olgenburg 1999 Sources control in urban sanitation and waste management: Ten systems with reuse of resources Water Science and Technology 39 153160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]. B. Jefferson A. Laine S. Parsons T. Stephenson S. Judd 1999 Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling Urban Water 1 285292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]. L. M. Casanova C. P. Gerba M. Karpiscak 2001 Chemical and microbial characterization of household graywater Journal of Environment Science and Health A 36 395401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [12]. J. Ottoson T. A. Stenström 2003 Faecal contamination of greywater and associated microbial risks Water Research 37 645655.

  • [13]. E. Friedler 2004 Quality of individual domestic grey water streams and its implication for on-site treatment and reuse possibilities Environmental Technology 25 9971008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [14]. J. B. Rose G. S. Sun C. P. Gerba N. A. Sinclair 1991 Microbial quality and persistence of enteric pathogens in graywater from various household sources Water Research 25 3742.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [15]. J. O'Toole M. Sinclair M. Malawaraarachchi A. Hamilton S. F. Barker K. Leder 2012 Microbial quality assessment of household greywater Water Research 46 43014313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [16]. G. P. Winward L. M. Avery R. Frazer-Williams M. Pidou P. Jeffrey T. Stephenson B. Jefferson 2008 A study of the microbial quality of grey water and an evaluation of treatment technologies for reuse Ecological Engineering 32 187197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]. A. Móring M. Lakatos Z. Bihari T. Szentimrey 2011 Analysis of extremely dry periods in Hungary on the base of Standard Precipitation Index time series XXVth Conference of the Danube Countries on Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management Budapest June 16–17, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [18]. R. Birks S. Hills 2007 Characterisation of indicator organisms and pathogens in domestic greywater for recycling Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 129 6169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [19]. USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency 2004 Guidelines for Water Reuse USEPA Washington, DC, USA.

  • [20]. A. Gross O. Shmueli Z. Ronen E. Raveh 2007 Recycled vertical flow constructed wetland (RVFCW) — a novel method of recycling greywater for irrigation in small communities and households Chemosphere 66 916923.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [21]. S. Surendan A. D. Wheatley 1998 Greywater reclamation for non-potable reuse Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management 12 406413.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [22]. B. Jefferson A. Palmer P. Jeffrey R. Stuetz S. Judd 2004 Grey water characterization and its impact on the selection of technologies for urban reuse Water Science and Technology 50 157164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
Submit Your Manuscript
 

Senior editors

Editor-in-Chief: Ákos, Lakatos University of Debrecen (Hungary)

Founder, former Editor-in-Chief (2011-2020): Ferenc Kalmár University of Debrecen (Hungary)

Founding Editor: György Csomós University of Debrecen (Hungary)

Associate Editor: Derek Clements Croome University of Reading (UK)

Associate Editor: Dezső Beke University of Debrecen (Hungary)

Editorial Board

  • Mohammad Nazir AHMAD Institute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

    Murat BAKIROV Center for Materials and Lifetime Management Ltd. Moscow Russia

    Nicolae BALC Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca Romania

    Umberto BERARDI Ryerson University Toronto Canada

    Ildikó BODNÁR University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Sándor BODZÁS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Fatih Mehmet BOTSALI Selçuk University Konya Turkey

    Samuel BRUNNER Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology

    István BUDAI University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Constantin BUNGAU University of Oradea Oradea Romania

    Shanshan CAI Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

    Michele De CARLI University of Padua Padua Italy

    Robert CERNY Czech Technical University in Prague Czech Republic

    György CSOMÓS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Tamás CSOKNYAI Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary

    Eugen Ioan GERGELY University of Oradea Oradea Romania

    József FINTA University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

    Anna FORMICA IASI National Research Council Rome

    Alexandru GACSADI University of Oradea Oradea Romania

    Eric A. GRULKE University of Kentucky Lexington United States

    Janez GRUM University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

    Géza HUSI University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Ghaleb A. HUSSEINI American University of Sharjah Sharjah United Arab Emirates

    Nikolay IVANOV Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University St. Petersburg Russia

    Antal JÁRAI Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

    Gudni JÓHANNESSON The National Energy Authority of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

    László KAJTÁR Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary

    Ferenc KALMÁR University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Tünde KALMÁR University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Milos KALOUSEK Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republik

    Jan KOCI Czech Technical University in Prague Prague Czech Republic

    Vaclav KOCI Czech Technical University in Prague Prague Czech Republic

    Imra KOCSIS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Imre KOVÁCS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Angela Daniela LA ROSA Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Éva LOVRA Univeqrsity of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Elena LUCCHI Eurac Research, Institute for Renewable Energy Bolzano Italy

    Tamás MANKOVITS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Igor MEDVED Slovak Technical University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia

    Ligia MOGA Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca Romania

    Marco MOLINARI Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden

    Henrieta MORAVCIKOVA Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia

    Phalguni MUKHOPHADYAYA University of Victoria Victoria Canada

    Balázs NAGY Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary

    Husam S. NAJM Rutgers University New Brunswick United States

    Jozsef NYERS Subotica Tech College of Applied Sciences Subotica Serbia

    Bjarne W. OLESEN Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark

    Stefan ONIGA North University of Baia Mare Baia Mare Romania

    Joaquim Norberto PIRES Universidade de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal

    László POKORÁDI Óbuda University Budapest Hungary

    Antal PUHL (1950–2023) University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Roman RABENSEIFER Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Bratislava Slovak Republik

    Mohammad H. A. SALAH Hashemite University Zarqua Jordan

    Dietrich SCHMIDT Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology IWES Kassel Germany

    Lorand SZABÓ Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca Romania

    Csaba SZÁSZ Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca Romania

    Ioan SZÁVA Transylvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania

    Péter SZEMES University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Edit SZŰCS University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Radu TARCA University of Oradea Oradea Romania

    Zsolt TIBA University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    László TÓTH University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    László TÖRÖK University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

    Anton TRNIK Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra Nitra Slovakia

    Ibrahim UZMAY Erciyes University Kayseri Turkey

    Tibor VESSELÉNYI University of Oradea Oradea Romania

    Nalinaksh S. VYAS Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur India

    Deborah WHITE The University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia

International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering
Address of the institute: Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen
H-4028 Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4. Hungary
Email: irase@eng.unideb.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • DOAJ
  • ERIH PLUS
  • Google Scholar
  • ProQuest
  • SCOPUS
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory

 

2022  
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
9
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.235
Scimago Quartile Score Architecture (Q2)
Engineering (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Environmental Engineering (Q3)
Information Systems (Q4)
Management Science and Operations Research (Q4)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.6
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Architecture 46/170 (73rd PCTL)
General Engineering 174/302 (42nd PCTL)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) 93/150 (38th PCTL)
Environmental Engineering 123/184 (33rd PCTL)
Management Science and Operations Research 142/198 (28th PCTL)
Information Systems 281/379 (25th PCTL)
 
Scopus
SNIP
0.686

2021  
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
7
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,199
Scimago Quartile Score Engineering (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Environmental Engineering (Q4)
Information Systems (Q4)
Management Science and Operations Research (Q4)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,2
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Architecture 48/149 (Q2)
General Engineering 186/300 (Q3)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) 79/124 (Q3)
Environmental Engineering 118/173 (Q3)
Management Science and Operations Research 141/184 (Q4)
Information Systems 274/353 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,457

2020  
Scimago
H-index
5
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,165
Scimago
Quartile Score
Engineering (miscellaneous) Q3
Environmental Engineering Q4
Information Systems Q4
Management Science and Operations Research Q4
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
102/116=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Engineering 205/297 (Q3)
Environmental Engineering 107/146 (Q3)
Information Systems 269/329 (Q4)
Management Science and Operations Research 139/166 (Q4)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) 64/98 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,26
Scopus
Cites
57
Scopus
Documents
36
Days from submission to acceptance 84
Days from acceptance to publication 348
Acceptance
Rate

23%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
4
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,229
Scimago
Quartile Score
Engineering (miscellaneous) Q2
Environmental Engineering Q3
Information Systems Q3
Management Science and Operations Research Q4
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
46/81=0,6
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Engineering 227/299 (Q4)
Environmental Engineering 107/132 (Q4)
Information Systems 259/300 (Q4)
Management Science and Operations Research 136/161 (Q4)
Materials Science (miscellaneous) 60/86 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,866
Scopus
Cites
35
Scopus
Documents
47
Acceptance
Rate
21%

 

International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 1100 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Limited number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
2010
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Debreceni Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary Egyetem tér 1
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2062-0810 (Print)
ISSN 2063-4269 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Oct 2023 4 28 0
Nov 2023 3 7 0
Dec 2023 48 8 3
Jan 2024 18 7 1
Feb 2024 1 3 1
Mar 2024 4 0 0
Apr 2024 2 0 0