Open access

To the paper:

Supplement 1: Journal of Behavioral Addictions

(Abstracts of the 4th International Conference on Behavioral Addictions)

The Abstract Book contained the following errors. We regret these errors and offer our sincere apologies to the authors.

1. The following abstract has been missing from the Abstract Book. The publisher would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Types of adolescents’ Internet overuse: Classification using environmental conditions and psychological values

BUGEUN KIM1, SEUL LEE2, YOUNG YIM DOH3 and GAHGENE GWEON1,2*

1Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2Advanced Institute of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea

3KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

*E-mail: ggweon@snu.ac.kr

Background and aims: Internet overuse behaviour has been classified mainly along two dimensions; content-oriented or user symptom-oriented. However, classification of factors on (1) common environmental conditions faced by users and (2) core psychological values that are pursued, have been less explored. The goal of this study is to gain deeper insight about these two dimensions, so that the knowledge can be used for developing effective intervention strategies. Methods: National Information Society Agency of Korea gathered 192 counselling records of adolescents who overuse the Internet. Each record consisted of an hour-long home visit, plus up to six follow-ups. First, we used a qualitative approach as inspired by grounded theory to identify 12 environmental and 9 psychological factors (Fleiss’ κ mean = 0.714, median = 0.850). Multiple Correspondence Analysis was conducted on the 21 factors to detect the top 6 principle components, which in turn were used for hierarchical clustering to identify 5 clusters. For each cluster, Chi-square test was used to identify distinguishing factors. Results: The 6 principle components explained 44% of variance. Each of the 5 cluster is described in terms of representative environmental condition and psychological value; (a) Academic Achievement and Social Status Seeking in School Life (N = 74), (b) Enjoyment Seeking with Inadequate Parenting (N = 53), (c) Isolation Seeking to Escape from Maladaptation in School (N = 32), (e) Attention Seeking Delinquent in Unstructured Family (N = 21) (f) Alternative Community Seeking to Escape from Real Life Relationship Problems (N = 12). Conclusions: Our results provide insights into understanding of underlying environmental and psychological factors that impact internet overuse, so that that can be used for developing personalized intervention strategies. Acknowledgement: NRF_Korea, Ministry_of_Science, ICT & Future Planning (2015M3C7A1065859).

2. The following abstract has been missing from the Abstract Book. The publisher would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Cue-induced craving in Internet-communication disorder: Comparison of visual and auditory cues

ELISA WEGMANN1*, BENJAMIN STODT1 and MATTHIAS BRAND1,2

1General Psychology: Cognition and Center of Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

2Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany

*E-mail: elisa.wegmann@uni-due.de

Background and aims: Internet-communication disorder describes the excessive and uncontrolled use of online-communication applications such as Facebook, WhatsApp, or Twitter. In analogy to results reported in behavioral addictions (pathological buying, Internet-gaming disorder, Internet-pornography disorder), cue-induced craving might be one process of the development and maintenance of such a pathological behavior. In the current study we investigated craving reactions when participants are confronted with neutral and addiction-related cues and if craving reactions were associated with symptoms of Internet-communication disorder. We also compared the relevance of visual and auditory cues, because communication applications are linked to both certain visual symbols and ringtones of mobile devices. Methods: In a 2x2 between-subject design a cue-reactivity paradigm was used. Participants (N = 88) were confronted with twelve cues in one of four conditions (visual-neutral, visual-addiction-related, auditory-neutral, auditory-addiction-related). To assess craving the Desire of Alcohol Questionnaire modified for Internet-communication disorder (DAQ-ICD) was applied before and after the paradigm. Tendencies towards Internet-communication disorder were assessed with a modified version of the short Internet Addiction Test. Results: The results illustrate that craving increased after the presentation of visual- as well as auditory- addiction-related cues. The craving-score decreased after the presentation of neutral cues, independent from sensory quality (visual or auditory). The DAQ-ICD scores were positively correlated with symptoms of Internet-communication disorder. Conclusions: The results indicate that addiction-related cues could lead to an increased subjective craving. Cue-reactivity and craving are potential mechanisms of the maintenance and development of an Internet-communication disorder which is similar to other substance or behavioral addictions.

3. On title page:

Associate Editor Aviv M. Weinstein’s affiliation appeared improperly as Hadassah Hospital, Israel on the title page of the Abstract Book.

The proper affiliation is Ariel University, Israel.

4. On page 33, OP-68:

The title of the abstract has been missing. The title is as follows:

Prevalence and correlates of problematic smartphone use in a large random sample of Chinese undergraduates

(JIANG LONG1,2, TIE-QIAO LIU2, YAN-HUI LIAO2,4, CHANG QI2, HAO-YU HE2, SHU-BAO CHEN2 and JOËL BILLIEUX1,3*)

5. On page 33, OP-69:

There is a typo in the title of the abstract of Olatz Lopez-Fernandez.

It reads: The evolution of a potential behavioural addictions through technologies: an explorative study from excessive online users’ perspective

The title should read as: The evolution of potential behavioral addictions through technologies: An explorative study from excessive online users perspective

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

  • Impact Factor (2019): 5.143
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 1.767
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 37
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Clinical Psychology (20/295)
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Psychiatry and Mental Health (49/545)
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q1 Medicine (miscellaneous) (186/2754)

 

  • Impact Factor (2018): 4.873
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 1.624
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 29
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Clinical Psychology (26/293)
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Psychiatry and Mental Health (62/555)
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q1 Medicine (miscellaneous) (217/2844)

 

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Web of Science [Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®)
  • Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
  • Social Sciences Citation Index®
  • Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition
  • Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • EBSCO
  • GoogleScholar
  • PsychInfo
  • PubMed Central
  • SCOPUS
  • Medline

Language: English

Founded in 2011
Publication: One volume of four issues annually

Publishing Model: Gold Open Access
Article processing charge: EUR 850.00 (as for discounts, please, check Author's instructions

Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 9.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Zsolt Demetrovics

Assistant Editor(s): Csilla Ágoston

Associate Editors

  • Judit Balázs (ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Joel Billieux (University of Lausanne, Switzerland)
  • Matthias Brand (University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany)
  • Anneke Goudriaan (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
  • Daniel King (Flinders University, Australia)
  • Ludwig Kraus (IFT Institute for Therapy Research, Germany)
  • Anikó Maráz (Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany)
  • Astrid Müller (Hannover Medical School, Germany)
  • Marc N. Potenza (Yale University, USA)
  • Hans-Jurgen Rumpf (University of Lübeck, Germany)
  • Attila Szabó (ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Róbert Urbán (ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Aviv M. Weinstein (Ariel University, Israel)

Editorial Board

  • Max W. Abbott (Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand)
  • Elias N. Aboujaoude (Stanford University School of Medicine, USA)
  • Hojjat Adeli (Ohio State University, USA)
  • Alex Baldacchino (University of Dundee, United Kingdom)
  • Alex Blaszczynski (University of Sidney, Australia)
  • Kenneth Blum (University of Florida, USA)
  • Henrietta Bowden-Jones (Imperial College, United Kingdom)
  • Beáta Bőthe (University of Montreal, Canada)
  • Wim van den Brink (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
  • Gerhard Bühringer (Technische Universität Dresden, Germany)
  • Sam-Wook Choi (Eulji University, Republic of Korea)
  • Damiaan Denys (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
  • Jeffrey L. Derevensky (McGill University, Canada)
  • Naomi Fineberg (University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom)
  • Marie Grall-Bronnec (University Hospital of Nantes, France)
  • Jon E. Grant (University of Minnesota, USA)
  • Mark Griffiths (Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom)
  • Heather Hausenblas (Jacksonville University, USA)
  • Tobias Hayer (University of Bremen, Germany)
  • Susumu Higuchi (National Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Japan)
  • David Hodgins (University of Calgary, Canada)
  • Eric Hollander (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, USA)
  • Jaeseung Jeong (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea)
  • Yasser Khazaal (Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland)
  • Orsolya Király (Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Emmanuel Kuntsche (La Trobe University, Australia)
  • Hae Kook Lee (The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea)
  • Michel Lejoyeux (Paris University, France)
  • Anikó Maráz (Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Giovanni Martinotti (‘Gabriele d’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy)
  • Frederick Gerard Moeller (University of Texas, USA)
  • Daniel Thor Olason (University of Iceland, Iceland)
  • Nancy Petry (University of Connecticut, USA)
  • Bettina Pikó (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar (Teheran University of Medical Sciences, Iran)
  • József Rácz (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary)
  • Rory C. Reid (University of California Los Angeles, USA)
  • Marcantanio M. Spada (London South Bank University, United Kingdom)
  • Daniel Spritzer (Study Group on Technological Addictions, Brazil)
  • Dan J. Stein (University of Cape Town, South Africa)
  • Sherry H. Stewart (Dalhousie University, Canada)
  • Attila Szabó (Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary)
  • Ferenc Túry (Semmelweis University, Hungary)
  • Alfred Uhl (Austrian Federal Health Institute, Austria)
  • Johan Vanderlinden (University Psychiatric Center K.U.Leuven, Belgium)
  • Alexander E. Voiskounsky (Moscow State University, Russia)
  • Kimberly Young (Center for Internet Addiction, USA)

Dr. Zsolt Demetrovics
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University
Address: Izabella u. 46. H-1064 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: +36-1-461-2681
E-mail: jba@ppk.elte.hu

Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective

Commentary on: A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution (van Rooij et al., 2018)