Author: Willem Molle
View More View Less
  • 1 Erasmus University Rotterdam Hungary
  • 2 ECORYS Research and Consultancy Rotterdam Hungary
Restricted access

The EU is confronted with a series of important problems. The two that interest us most in the present paper are the lack of competitiveness on international markets and the considerable internal (regional) imbalances. Since quite some time the EU has put policies in practice to address both problems: the Lisbon Strategy for the former and Cohesion Policy for the latter.In our paper we describe the rather independent development of both policies in terms of objectives, instruments, delivery system, etc. We highlight that the main inadequacy of the Lisbon Strategy is its lack of funds. The solution that has been found to this problem is to reorient these funds originally destined to address cohesion problems to the aims of competitiveness, notably innovation. This has been done maintaining the Cohesion Policy delivery system. Although this somewhat distorted solution has proven workable, quite a few inadequacies in matters of effectiveness have emerged. We conclude the paper with some recommendations to improve that situation by the use of better coordination methods.

  • Clarysse, B. — Muldur, U. (2001): Regional cohesion in Europe. An analysis of how EU public RTD support influences the techno economic regional landscape. Research Policy , 30: 275–296.

    Muldur U. , 'Regional cohesion in Europe. An analysis of how EU public RTD support influences the techno economic regional landscape ' (2001 ) 30 Research Policy : 275 -296.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Cooke, Ph, — Boekholt, P. — Toedling, F. (eds) (2000): The Governance of Innovation in Europe; Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness . London-New York: Pinter.

    '', in The Governance of Innovation in Europe; Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness , (2000 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • DTI (2005): Thematic Evaluation of the Structural Funds’ Contributions to the Lisbon Strategy; Synthesis Report . Copenhagen: Danish Technological Institute.

    '', in Thematic Evaluation of the Structural Funds’ Contributions to the Lisbon Strategy; Synthesis Report , (2005 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • EC (2000): Structural Indicators . Communication from the Commission, COM(2002)551 final.

  • EC (2003a): Innovation Policy; updating the Unions approach in the context of the Lisbon Strategy . COM(2003)112 final.

  • EC (2003b): Structural Policies and European Territories: Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Cohesion in Europe — From Lisbon to Gothenburg . Brussels: European Commission, DG Regio.

    '', in Structural Policies and European Territories: Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Cohesion in Europe — From Lisbon to Gothenburg , (2003 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • EC (2004): A New Partnership for Cohesion, Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion . Brussels: European Commission.

    '', in A New Partnership for Cohesion, Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , (2004 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • EC (2005): Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: More research and innovation-investing for growth and employment; a common approach . Brussels: European Commission.

    '', in Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: More research and innovation-investing for growth and employment; a common approach , (2005 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • EC (2007a): Competitive European Regions through research and innovation; a contribution to more growth and more and better jobs . COM(2007)474 final.

  • EC (2007b): RTD, Innovation, cohesion and rural development policies; reinforced synergies (accompanying document to EC 2007a). SEC(2007)1045.

  • EC (2007c): CREST Guidelines on Coordinating the Framework Programme and the Structural Funds to Support Research and Development . Brussels: Cordis Library.

    '', in CREST Guidelines on Coordinating the Framework Programme and the Structural Funds to Support Research and Development , (2007 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • EC (2007d): Cohesion policy set to give major boost to Lisbon strategy for 2007–2013 , IP/07/1904. Available from EU website.

  • ECOTEC (2004): The territorial impact of EU research and development policies (available from the ESPON website www.espon.lu/project2.1.2).

  • EP (2006): Synergies between the EU 7th Research Framework programme, the competitiveness and innovation framework programme and the Structural Funds . European Parliament document IP/A/ITRE/FWC/2006-87/LOT3/C1.

  • EURAB (2007): Energizing Europe’s knowledge triangle of research, education and innovation through the Structural Funds . Final Report 07.010. Brussels: European Research Advisory Board.

    '', in Energizing Europe’s knowledge triangle of research, education and innovation through the Structural Funds , (2007 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Griffith, R. (2000): How important is business R&D for economic growth and should the government subsidise it? Briefing Note, no. 12. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Griffith R. , '', in How important is business R&D for economic growth and should the government subsidise it? , (2000 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hall, R. — Smith, A. — Tsoukalis, L. (eds) (2001): Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU policies . Oxford: OUP.

    '', in Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU policies , (2001 ) -.

  • Landabaso, M. et al. (1997): The promotion of innovation in regional policy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , 9: 1–24.

    Landabaso M. , 'The promotion of innovation in regional policy ' (1997 ) 9 Entrepreneurship and Regional Development : 1 -24.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Molle, W. (1985a): Technology and regional development in the European Community. In: Kotopoulos, K.— Phebus, C. — Nijkamp, P. (eds): Regional Development in the Mediterranean . Athens: Phebus, 35–51.

    Molle W. , '', in Regional Development in the Mediterranean , (1985 ) -.

  • Molle, W. (1985b): Technology, trade, and differential growth in the European Community. In: Cappellin, R. — Nijkamp, P. (eds): The Spatial Context of Technological Development . Aldershot: Avebury, 395–413.

    Molle W. , '', in The Spatial Context of Technological Development , (1985 ) -.

  • Molle, W. (2006): Economics of European Integration; Theory, Practice, Policy . 5 th ed. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Molle W. , '', in Economics of European Integration; Theory, Practice, Policy , (2006 ) -.

  • Molle, W. (2007): European Cohesion Policy . London: Routledge.

    Molle W. , '', in European Cohesion Policy , (2007 ) -.

  • Molle, W. (2009): European policies for innovation and cohesion; from loose coordination to partial integration. In: Molle, W. — Djarova, J. (eds): Enhancing the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy; New Roles for Key Players . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Molle W. , '', in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy; New Roles for Key Players , (2009 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Mytelka, L. K. — Smith, K. (2002): Policy learning and innovation theory; an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy , 31: 1467–1479.

    Smith K. , 'Policy learning and innovation theory; an interactive and co-evolving process ' (2002 ) 31 Research Policy : 1467 -1479.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Nauwelaers, C. — Wintjes, R. (eds) (2008): Innovation Policy in Europe; Measurement and Strategy . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    '', in Innovation Policy in Europe; Measurement and Strategy , (2008 ) -.

  • Peterson, J. — Sharp, M. (1998): Technology Policy in the European Union . Houndsmill-Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Sharp M. , '', in Technology Policy in the European Union , (1998 ) -.

  • Sharp, M. — Pereira, T. S. (2001): Research and Technological Development. In: Hall et al. (2001).