EU Cohesion Policy transfers have the effect of enabling the least wealthy regions to achieve higher levels of investment in human and physical capital than would otherwise be the case, so helping to improve their long-term competitiveness. There is evidence of significant growth in GDP and a considerable reduction in unemployment compared with the case without subsidies. However, beyond its quantitative effects, the added value of the policy arises from other aspects, like the contribution made to national regional development policies by factors such as multi-annual programming frameworks, partnership, evaluation, co-operation between regions, and its political added value. These impacts have clearly contributed to the ‘Europeanisation’ of objectives, contents and operation of national development policies.
Bachtler, J. — Taylor, S. (eds) (2003): The Added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective . University of Strathclyde, Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre.
'', in The Added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective , (2003 ) -.
Bradley, J. (2000): The impact of CSF on Objective 1 countries — 1989–2006 . Study for the Regional Policy DG of the European Commission. Brussels.
Bradley J. , '', in The impact of CSF on Objective 1 countries — 1989–2006 , (2000 ) -.
Cecchini, P. (1988): The European Challenge, 1992 . Aldershot: Wildwood House.
Cecchini P. , '', in The European Challenge, 1992 , (1988 ) -.
Council of the CEU (1999): Council Regulation (EC) No. 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds. Official Journal of the European Communities . No. L 161, 26 June 1999.
Council of the CEU (2005): Financial Perspective 2007-2013. Brussels. 16.12.2005; http://www.eu2005.gov.uk/
Council of the CEU (2006): Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. Official Journal of the European Union , No. L210, 31 July 2006.
EK (1997): Die Auswirkungen der Strukturpolitik auf die wirtschaftliche und sociale Kohäsion in der Union 1989–1999 . Regionale Entwicklungsstudien. Luxemburg: Europäische Kommission.
'', in Regionale Entwicklungsstudien , (1997 ) -.
EC (2001): Unity, Solidarity, Diversity for Europe, Its People and Its Territory. Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion . Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Commission.
'', in Unity, Solidarity, Diversity for Europe, Its People and Its Territory. Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , (2001 ) -.
EC (2004a): A New Partnership for Cohesion. Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation . Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Commission.
'', in Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , (2004 ) -.
EC (2004b): Building our common future. Policy Changes and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007–2013 . COM(2004)101.
EC (2007): Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Fourth report on economic and social cohesion . Communication from the Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. May 2007, Luxembourg.
EC-DGEFA (2007): European Economy . Brussels: European Commission Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs.
'', in European Economy , (2007 ) -.
Hübner, D. (2005): Policy Focus: The future of cohesion policy in the larger EU. 17 January 2005; Brussels; http://www.eupolitix.com/EN/News/200501/
Kengyel, Á. (2005): Cohesion and Cohesion Policy. The added value of EU level intervention; http://www.lisboncivicforum.org/Docs/D06_AkosKengyel.pdf/
Kengyel, Á. (2008): Kohézió és finanszírozás. Az Európai Unió regionális politikája és költségvetése [Cohesion and Finance. Regional policy and budget of the European Union]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kengyel , '', in Kohézió és finanszírozás. Az Európai Unió regionális politikája és költségvetése , (2008 ) -.