Authors:
Balázs Szent-IványiCorvinus University of Budapest Department of World Economy Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Balázs Szent-Iványi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Gábor VigváriCorvinus University of Budapest Department of World Economy Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Gábor Vigvári in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Restricted access

In the paper, we construct a composite indicator to estimate the potential of four Central and Eastern European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) to benefit from productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) in the manufacturing sector. Such transfers of technology are one of the main benefits of FDI for the host country, and should also be one of the main determinants of FDI incentives offered to investing multinationals by governments, but they are difficult to assess ex ante. For our composite index, we use six components to proxy the main channels and determinants of these spillovers. We have tried several weighting and aggregation methods, and we consider our results robust. According to the analysis of our results, between 2003 and 2007 all four countries were able to increase their potential to benefit from such spillovers, although there are large differences between them. The Czech Republic clearly has the most potential to benefit from productivity spillovers, while Poland has the least. The relative positions of Hungary and Slovakia depend to some extent on the exact weighting and aggregation method of the individual components of the index, but the differences are not large. These conclusions have important implications both the investment strategies of multinationals and government FDI policies.

  • Aitken, B. J., Harrison, A. E. (1999): Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. The American Economic Review 89(3): 605–618.

    Harrison A. E. , 'Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela ' (1999 ) 89 The American Economic Review : 605 -618 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Allard, C. (2009): Competitiveness in Central-Europe: What Has Happened Since EU Accession? IMF Working Paper 9121.

  • Blalock, G. — Gertler, P. J. (2008): Welfare Gains from Foreign Direct Investment through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers. Journal of International Economics 74: 402–421.

    Gertler P. J. , 'Welfare Gains from Foreign Direct Investment through Technology Transfer to Local Suppliers ' (2008 ) 74 Journal of International Economics : 402 -421 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Blomström, M. — Kokko, A. (2003): The Economics of Foreign Direct Investment Incentives. In: Herrmann, H. — Lipsey, R. E. (eds): Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries. Springer.

  • Blomström, M. — Globerman, S. — Kokko, A. (1999): The Determinants of Host Country Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Review and Synthesis of the Literature. EIJS Working Paper No. 76.

  • Cohen, S. D. (2007): Multinational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Cohen S. D. , '', in Multinational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment , (2007 ) -.

  • Damijan, J. P. — Knell, M. — Majcen, B. — Rojec, M. (2003): Technology Transfer through FDI in Top-10 Transition Countries: How Important are Direct Effects, Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers? William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 549.

  • Djankov, S. — Hoekman, B. (2000): Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises. World Bank Economic Review 14(1): 49–64.

    Hoekman B. , 'Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises ' (2000 ) 14 World Bank Economic Review : 49 -64 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Görg, H. — Greenaway, D. (2003): Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? IZA Discussion Paper No. 944.

  • Heston, A. — Summers, R. — Aten, B. (2011): Penn World Table Version 7.0. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/

  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004): Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages. American Economic Review 94(3): 605–627.

    Javorcik B. S. , 'Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages ' (2004 ) 94 American Economic Review : 605 -627 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Javorcik, B. S. (2008): Can Survey Evidence Shed Light on Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? World Bank Research Observer 23(2): 139–159.

    Javorcik B. S. , 'Can Survey Evidence Shed Light on Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? ' (2008 ) 23 World Bank Research Observer : 139 -159 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Javorcik, B. S. — Spatareanu, M. (2008): To Share or not to Share: Does Local Participation Matter for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? Journal of Development Economics 85(1–2): 194–217.

    Spatareanu M. , 'To Share or not to Share: Does Local Participation Matter for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? ' (2008 ) 85 Journal of Development Economics : 194 -217 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kokko, A. (1994): Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers. Journal of Development Economics 43(2): 279–293.

    Kokko A. , 'Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers ' (1994 ) 43 Journal of Development Economics : 279 -293 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kolasa, M. (2007): How Does FDI Inflow Affect Productivity of Domestic Firms? The Role of Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers, Absorptive Capacity and Competition. National Bank of Poland Working Paper No. 42.

  • Konings, J. (2001): The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms. Evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies. Economics of Transition 9(3): 619–633.

    Konings J. , 'The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms. Evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies ' (2001 ) 9 Economics of Transition : 619 -633 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Melitz, M. J. — Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008): Market Size, Trade, and Productivity. Review of Economic Studies 75: 295–316.

    Ottaviano G. I. P. , 'Market Size, Trade, and Productivity ' (2008 ) 75 Review of Economic Studies : 295 -316 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Melyn, W. — Moesen, W. W. (1991): Towards a Synthetic Indicator of Macroeconomic Performance: Unequal Weighting when Limited Information is Available. Public Economic Research Paper 17, CES, KU Leuven.

    Moesen W. W. , '', in Towards a Synthetic Indicator of Macroeconomic Performance: Unequal Weighting when Limited Information is Available , (1991 ) -.

  • Nicoletti, G. — Scarpetta, S. — Boylaud, O. (2000): Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an Extension to Employment Protection Legislation. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 226.

  • OECD (2008): Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD.

    '', in Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide , (2008 ) -.

  • Rodrik, D. (1999): The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Overseas Development Council Policy Essay 24.

  • Saaty, R. W. (1987): The Analytic Hierarchy Process: What it is and how it is Used, Mathematical Modelling 9: 161–176.

    Saaty R. W. , 'The Analytic Hierarchy Process: What it is and how it is Used ' (1987 ) 9 Mathematical Modelling : 161 -176 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sachs, J. D. — Warner, A. M. (1995): Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5398.

  • Schoors, K. — van der Tol, B. (2001): The Productivity Effect of Foreign Ownership on Domestic Firms in Hungary. University of Gent Working Paper 2002/157.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,196
Scimago Quartile Score Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Industrial Relations (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science (Q3)
Business and International Management (Q4)
Public Administration (Q4)
Strategy and Management (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,2
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Sociology and Political Science 626/1345 (Q2)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 131/260 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 35/57 (Q3)
Public Administration 120/190 (Q3)
Business and International Management 292/423 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 340/456 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,270

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article with enough waivers
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)