View More View Less
  • 1 Babep-Bolyai University Public Administration Department Cluj-Napoca Romania
Restricted access

Program evaluation culture and capacity is at the very beginning of its development in Romania. In this article we highlight one of the fundamental, but not always obvious, connections that support sustainable evaluation culture and capacity building and development: the link between leadership and program evaluation. If properly used, program evaluation results can be a strong instrument in leadership, just as leadership can fundamentally encourage the development of evaluation culture and capacity. More precisely, we identify the ways in which different power sources can help leaders in developing evaluation culture and capacity.

  • Curley, H. — Perianu, E. (2006): Assessment of the Evaluation Culture in Romania. http://static.anaf.ro/static/10/Mfp/evaluare/Assessment_Romanian_Eval_CultureEN.pdf , accessed 7 February 2012

  • ECOTEC (2006): Thematic Report on Support to PAJC in Bulgaria and Romania. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/financial_assistance/phare/evaluation/zz_pajc_0536_final_version_revised_e4_en.pdf , accessed 7 February 2012

  • French, J. R.P. — Raven, B. (1959): Bases of Social Power. In: Cartwright, D. (ed.): Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Raven B. , '', in Studies in Social Power , (1959 ) -.

  • Gârboan, R. I. (2007): Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions at regional and local level. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2007(21E): 47–60.

    Gârboan R. I. , 'Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions at regional and local level ' (2007 ) 2007 Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences : 47 -60.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gârboan, R. I. — Pandor, D. (2007): Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2007(19E): 71–78.

    Pandor D. , 'Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions ' (2007 ) 2007 Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences : 71 -78.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hinoea, C. — Hinoea, C. — Oiclau, T. — Jenei, G. — Vasquez-Burguete, J. — Gutierrez Rodriguez, P. (2010): Management si leadership in sectorul public in Managementul administratiei publice [Management and Leaderhip in the Public Sector in Public Administration Management]. Cluj-Napoca: Accent.

    Gutierrez Rodriguez P. , '', in Management si leadership in sectorul public in Managementul administratiei publice , (2010 ) -.

  • Malan, J. (2004): Benchmarking Evaluation Capacity in the New Member States. Sevenoaks: Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services.

    Malan J. , '', in Benchmarking Evaluation Capacity in the New Member States , (2004 ) -.

  • Patton, Q. M. (1997): Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Patton Q. M. , '', in Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text , (1997 ) -.

  • Shadish, W. R. Jr. — Cook, T. D. — Leviton L. C. (1999): Fundamentele evaluarii programelor: Teorii ale practicii [Fundamentals of program evaluation: Theory and practice]. Bucurepti: FIMAN.

    Leviton L. C. , '', in Fundamentele evaluarii programelor: Teorii ale practicii , (1999 ) -.

  • Stake, R. (2004): Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Sage Publications.

  • United States General Accounting Office (2003): Program Evaluation — An Evaluation Culture and Collaborative Partnerships Help Building Agency Capacity. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03454.pdf , accessed 7 February 2012

  • Weiss, C. H. (1995): Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In: Connell, J. P. — Kubish, A. C. — Schorr, L. B. — Weiss, C. H. (eds): New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.

    Weiss C. H. , '', in New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives , (1995 ) -.