View More View Less
  • 1 Corvinus University of Budapest Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Information Systems Budapest Hungary
  • 2 Corvinus University of Budapest Department of Information Systems Budapest Hungary
Restricted access

Corporate governance has become increasingly important in developed and developing countries just after a series of corporate scandals and failures in a number of countries. Corporate governance structure is often viewed as a means of corporate success despite prior studies reveal mixed, somewhere conflicting and ambiguous, and somewhere no relationship between governance structure and performance. This study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance of listed banking companies in Bangladesh by using two multiple regression models. The study reveals that a good number of companies do not comply with the regulatory requirements indicating remarkable shortfall in corporate governance practice. The companies are run by the professional managers having no duality and no ownership interest for which they are compensated by high remuneration to curb agency conflict. Apart from some inconsistent relationship between some corporate variables, the corporate governance mechanisms do not appear to have significant relationship with financial performances. The findings reveal an insignificant negative impact or somewhere no impact of independent directors and non-independent non-executive directors on the level of performance that strongly support the concept that the managers are essentially worthy of trust and earn returns for the owners as claimed by stewardship theory. The study provides support for the view that while much emphasis on corporate governance mechanisms is necessary to safeguard the interest of stakeholders; corporate governance on its own, as a set of codes or standards for corporate conformance, cannot make a company successful. Companies need to balance corporate governance mechanisms with performance by adopting strategic decision and risk management with the efficient utilization of the organization ’s resources.

  • ASB (2000): Statement of Financial Performance, FRED 22, Revision of FRS 3, Reporting Financial Performance. London.

  • Agrawal, A. — Knoeber, C. R. (1996): Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Manager and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31: 377–389.

    Knoeber C. R. , 'Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Manager and Shareholders ' (1996 ) 31 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis : 377 -389.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Banking Reform Commission (1999): The Report of the Banking Reform Commission. Government of Bangladesh.

  • Basu, S. — Hwang, L. S. — Mitsudome, T. — Weintrop, J. (2007): Corporate Governance, Top Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 15(1): 56–79.

    Weintrop J. , 'Corporate Governance, Top Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in Japan ' (2007 ) 15 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal : 56 -79.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Baysinger, B. — Hoskisson, D. R. E. (1990): The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review 15: 72–87.

    Hoskisson D. R. E. , 'The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy ' (1990 ) 15 Academy of Management Review : 72 -87.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Becht, M. — Bolton, P. — Röell, A. (2005): Corporate Governance and Control. Financial Working Paper no. 02/2002.

  • Bhagat, S. — Black, B. (1998): Board Independence and Long term Performance. Working Paper, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Black B. , '', in Board Independence and Long term Performance. Working Paper , (1998 ) -.

  • Bhagat, S. — Bolton, B. (2008): Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3): 257–273.

    Bolton B. , 'Corporate Governance and Firm Performance ' (2008 ) 14 Journal of Corporate Finance : 257 -273.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Black, B. S. — Kim, W. (2008): The Effect of Board Structure on Firm Value: A Multiple Identification Strategies Approach Using Korean Data. McCombs Research Paper, No. FIN-02-07.

  • Brick, I. E. — Palmon, O. — Wald, J. K. (2006): CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3): 403–423.

    Wald J. K. , 'CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism? ' (2006 ) 12 Journal of Corporate Finance : 403 -423.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chen, M. — Lee, K. C. (2008): Compensation, Corporate Governance and Owner Shareholding: Theory and Evidence from Family Ownership. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 22: 144–162.

    Lee K. C. , 'Compensation, Corporate Governance and Owner Shareholding: Theory and Evidence from Family Ownership ' (2008 ) 22 International Research Journal of Finance and Economics : 144 -162.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chiang, H. (2005): An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance. The Journal of American Academy of Business 6(1): 95–101.

    Chiang H. , 'An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance ' (2005 ) 6 The Journal of American Academy of Business : 95 -101.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Choi, J. J. — Park, S. W. — Yoo, S. S. (2007): The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 42: 941–962.

    Yoo S. S. , 'The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform in Korea ' (2007 ) 42 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis : 941 -962.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Coles, J. W. — Victoria, B. M. — Nilanjan, S. (2001): An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance. Journal of Management 27: 23–50.

    Nilanjan S. , 'An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance ' (2001 ) 27 Journal of Management : 23 -50.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Conyon, M. J. — Schwalbach, J. (2000): Executive Compensation: Evidence from the UK and Germany. Long Range Planning 33(4): 504–526.

    Schwalbach J. , 'Executive Compensation: Evidence from the UK and Germany ' (2000 ) 33 Long Range Planning : 504 -526.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Davis, J. H. — Schoorman, F. D. — Donaldson, L. (1997): Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review 22: 20–47.

    Donaldson L. , 'Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management ' (1997 ) 22 Academy of Management Review : 20 -47.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Demsetz, H. — Villalonga, B. (2001): Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 209–233.

    Villalonga B. , 'Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance ' (2001 ) 7 Journal of Corporate Finance : 209 -233.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Dhandirek, R. — Tang, J. (2003): Corporate Governance Problems in Thailand: Is Ownership Concentration the Cause?. Asia Pacific Business Review 10: 121–138.

    Tang J. , 'Corporate Governance Problems in Thailand: Is Ownership Concentration the Cause? ' (2003 ) 10 Asia Pacific Business Review : 121 -138.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Duffhues, P. — Kabir, R. (2008): Is the Pay-Performance Relationship Always Positive? Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 18(1): 45–60.

    Kabir R. , 'Is the Pay-Performance Relationship Always Positive? Evidence from the Netherlands ' (2008 ) 18 Journal of Multinational Financial Management : 45 -60.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fahy, M. — Roche, J. — Weiner, A. (2005): Beyond Governance — Creating Corporate Value through Performance, Conformance and Responsibility. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Weiner A. , '', in Beyond Governance — Creating Corporate Value through Performance, Conformance and Responsibility , (2005 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fishman, J. — Gannon, G. — Vinning, R. (2005): Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance: Australian Evidence. Unpublished working paper, Social Science Review Network.

  • Gregory, H. J. — Simms, M. E. (1999): Corporate Governance: What it is and Why it Matters. The 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference (Kuala Lumpur).

  • Gujarati, D. (2004): Basic Econometrics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Gujarati D. , '', in Basic Econometrics , (2004 ) -.

  • Haniffa, R. — Hudaib, M. (2006): Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33(7–8): 1034–1062.

    Hudaib M. , 'Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies ' (2006 ) 33 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting : 1034 -1062.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hermalin, B. — Weisbach, M. (1991): The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management 20: 101–112.

    Weisbach M. , 'The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance ' (1991 ) 20 Financial Management : 101 -112.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hermalin, B. — Weisbach, M. (2001): Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8161

    Weisbach M. , '', in Working Paper , (2001 ) -.

  • Himmelberg, C. P. — Hubbard, R. G. — Palia, D. (1999): Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53(3): 353–384.

    Palia D. , 'Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance ' (1999 ) 53 Journal of Financial Economics : 353 -384.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Ho, C. K. (2005): Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: An International Analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13(2): 211–253.

    Ho C. K. , 'Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: An International Analysis ' (2005 ) 13 Corporate Governance: An International Review : 211 -253.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Holderness, C. G. — Sheehan, D. P. (1988): The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 317–346.

    Sheehan D. P. , 'The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis ' (1988 ) 20 Journal of Financial Economics : 317 -346.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Holthausen, R. — Larcker, D. (1993): Board of Directors, Ownership Structure and CEO Compensation. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986): Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Take-overs. American Economic Review 76: 323–39.

    Jensen M. C. , 'Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Take-overs ' (1986 ) 76 American Economic Review : 323 -39.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jensen, M. C. (1993): The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance 48: 831–80.

    Jensen M. C. , 'The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems ' (1993 ) 48 Journal of Finance : 831 -80.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jensen, M. C. — Meckling, W. H. (1976): Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behaviors, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–306.

    Meckling W. H. , 'Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behaviors, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure ' (1976 ) 3 Journal of Financial Economics : 305 -306.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jonathan, J. S. (2007): Corporate Governance and Accountability. Chichester: John Wiley&Sons.

    Jonathan J. S. , '', in Corporate Governance and Accountability , (2007 ) -.

  • Klein, A. (1998): Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41(1): 275–303.

    Klein A. , 'Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure ' (1998 ) 41 Journal of Law and Economics : 275 -303.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Krivogorsky, V. (2006): Ownership, Board Structure and Performance in Continental Europe. The International Journal of Accounting 41: 176–197.

    Krivogorsky V. , 'Ownership, Board Structure and Performance in Continental Europe ' (2006 ) 41 The International Journal of Accounting : 176 -197.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Leech, D. — Leahy, J. (1991): Ownership Structure, Control Type, Classifications and the Performance of Large British Companies. Economic Journal 101: 1418–1437.

    Leahy J. , 'Ownership Structure, Control Type, Classifications and the Performance of Large British Companies ' (1991 ) 101 Economic Journal : 1418 -1437.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lehmann, E. — Weigand, J. (2000): Does the Governed Corporation Perform Better? Governance Structures and Corporate Performance in Germany. European Finance Review 4(2): 157–195.

    Weigand J. , 'Does the Governed Corporation Perform Better? Governance Structures and Corporate Performance in Germany ' (2000 ) 4 European Finance Review : 157 -195.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lemmon, M. L. — Lins, K. V. (2003): Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance 58(4): 1445–1468.

    Lins K. V. , 'Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis ' (2003 ) 58 Journal of Finance : 1445 -1468.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Li, M. — Simerly, R. (1998): The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Ownership and Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal 19: 169–179.

    Simerly R. , 'The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Ownership and Performance Relationship ' (1998 ) 19 Strategic Management Journal : 169 -179.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Monks, R. — Minow, N. (1995): Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Minow N. , '', in Corporate Governance , (1995 ) -.

  • Murali, R. — Welch, J. B. (1989): Agents, Owners, Control and Performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 16: 385–398.

    Welch J. B. , 'Agents, Owners, Control and Performance ' (1989 ) 16 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting : 385 -398.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • PAIB Committee of IFAC (2004): Enterprise Governance — Getting the Balance Right. International Federation of Accountants. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/enterprise-governance-gett.pdf

  • Rose, C. (2005): Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in Listed Danish Firms: In Search of the Missing Link. European Management Journal 23(5): 542–553.

    Rose C. , 'Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in Listed Danish Firms: In Search of the Missing Link ' (2005 ) 23 European Management Journal : 542 -553.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Short, H. — Keasey, K. (1999): Managerial Ownership and The Performance of Firms: Evidence from The UK. Journal of Corporate Finance 5(1): 79–101.

    Keasey K. , 'Managerial Ownership and The Performance of Firms: Evidence from The UK ' (1999 ) 5 Journal of Corporate Finance : 79 -101.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sobhan, F. — Werner, W. (eds) (2003): A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Governance in South Asia: Charting a Roadmap for Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangladesh Enterprise Institute.

    '', in A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Governance in South Asia: Charting a Roadmap for Bangladesh , (2003 ) -.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wang, J. L. — Jeng, V. — Peng, J. L. (2007): The Impact of Corporate Governance Structure on the Efficiency Performance of Insurance Companies in Taiwan. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issue and Practice 32: 264–282.

    Peng J. L. , 'The Impact of Corporate Governance Structure on the Efficiency Performance of Insurance Companies in Taiwan ' (2007 ) 32 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issue and Practice : 264 -282.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Weir, C. — Laing, D. (1999): The Governance-Performance Relationship: The Effects of Cadbury Compliance on UK Quoted Companies. European Accounting Conference (Bordeaux).

  • Weir, C. — Laing, D. (2000): The Performance-Governance Relationship: The Effects of Cadbury Compliance on UK Quoted Companies. Journal of Management and Governance 4(4): 265–281.

    Laing D. , 'The Performance-Governance Relationship: The Effects of Cadbury Compliance on UK Quoted Companies ' (2000 ) 4 Journal of Management and Governance : 265 -281.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Weir, C. — Laing, D. — McKnight, P. J. (2002): Internal and External Governance Mechanisms: Their Impact on the Performance of Large UK Public Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29: 579–611.

    McKnight P. J. , 'Internal and External Governance Mechanisms: Their Impact on the Performance of Large UK Public Companies ' (2002 ) 29 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting : 579 -611.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Yermack, D. (1996): Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185–211.

    Yermack D. , 'Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors ' (1996 ) 40 Journal of Financial Economics : 185 -211.

    • Search Google Scholar