View More View Less
  • 1 Corvinus University of Budapest
Restricted access

The aim of the paper is to highlight the main characteristics of the recent Hungarian public administration reform, as well as to reveal the inconsistent nature of some of its elements and to describe the connected risks. The starting point of the article is the Magyary Zoltán public administration development programme. The reform steps are compared to the ideal type NPM approach. The Hungarian public administration reform can be characterized by strong centralization and the revitalization of Hungarian anti-liberal traditions at macro level, and by the support of the enhancement of market rules and management at micro level.

  • Alonso, J. M. - Clifton, J. - Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2011): Did New Public Management matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size. COCOPS Working Paper 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arellano-Gault, D. (2010): Economic-NPM and the Need to Bring Justice and Equity Back to the Debate on Public Organizations. Administration & Society 42, No. 5: 591612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aucoin, A. (2012): New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk. Governance 25, No. 2: 177199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bach, S. - Bordogna, L. (2011): Varieties of New Public Management or Alternative Models? The Reform of Public Service Employment Relations in Industrialized Democracies. International Journal of Human Resource Management 22, No. 11: 22812294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bao, G. - Wang, X. - Larsen, G. L. - Morgan, D. F. (2013): Beyond New Public Governance: A Value-Based Global Framework for Performance Management, Governance, and Leadership. Administration & Society 45, No. 4: 443467.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barzelay, M. (2001): The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Borins, S. (2002): New Public Management, North American Style. In: McLaughlin, K. - Osborne, S. P. - Ferlie, E. (eds): New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. New York, NY: Routledge, 181194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boston, J. (2011): Basic NPM Ideas and Their Development. In: Christensen, T. - Lægreid, P. (eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1732.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Box, R. C. - Marshall, G. S. - Reed, B. J. - Reed, C. M. (2001): New Public Management and Substantive Democracy. Public Administration Review 61, No. 5: 608619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, T. - Lægreid, P. (2002): New Public Management: Puzzles of Democracy and the Influence of Citizens. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, No. 3: 267295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, T. - Lægreid, P (eds) (2011): The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Manage ment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fesler, J. W. (1968): Centralization and Decentralization. In: Sills, D. L. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Macmillan, Vol. 2, 370379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • G. Fodor G. - Kern T. (2009): A rendszerváltás válsága. [The crisis of the regime change.]. Budapest: Századvég Kiadó.

  • Greve, C. - Hodge, G. (2011): A Transformative Perspective on Public-private Partnerships. In: Christensen, T. - Lægreid, P. (eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 265280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grüning, G. (2001): Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal 4, No. 1: 125.

  • Hajnal G. (2011): Adminisztratív politika a 2000-es évtizedben. Az ügynökség-típusú államigazgatási szervek strukturális dinamikája 2002 és 2009 között. [Administrative Politics in the Decade of 2000. The Structural Dynamics of the Organs of Public Administration of Agency Type between 2002 and 2009.]. Politikatudományi Szemle 20, No. 3: 5474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hajnal, G. (2013): Public Sector Reform in Hungary: Views and Experiences from Senior Executives. Country Report as Part of the COCOPS Research Project.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hajnal, G. - Rosta, M. (2014): The Illiberal State on the Local Level. The Doctrinal Foundations of Subnational Governance Reforms in Hungary (2010–2014). Working Papers in Political Science 2014/1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haynes, P. (2011): The Return of New Public Management? Working Paper SSRN.

  • Hood, C. (1991): A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration 69, No. 1: 319.

  • Hood, C. (2007): Public Service Management by Numbers: Why Does It Vary? Where Has It Come from? What Are the Gaps and the Puzzles? Public Money - Management 27, No. 2: 95102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutchcroft, P. D. (2001): Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance 14, No. 1: 2353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jun, J. S. (2009): The Limits of Post-New Public Management and beyond. Public Administration Review 69, No. 1: 161165.

  • Kertész K. (2012): Hogyan mérjük a pártok centralizáltságának fokát? [How to measure the degree of Parties’ centralisation?]. XXI. század Tudományos Közlemények 28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kornai, J. (2012): Centralization and the Capitalist Market Economy in Hungary. CESifo Forum 13, No. 4: 4759.

  • Kovács, Pálné, I. (2011): Local Governance in Hungary - the Balance of the Last 20 Years (Discussion Papers 2011/83). Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Körösényi, A. (2005): Political Representation in Leader Democracy. Government and Opposition 40, No. 3: 358378.

  • Kuhlmann, S. (2010): New Public Management for the ‘Classical Continental European Administration’: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy. Public Administration 88, No. 4: 11161130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lapsley, I. (2009): New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? Abacus 45, No. 1: 121.

  • Lapsley, I. (2010): New Public Management in the Global Financial Crisis - Dead, Alive, or Born Again? Working Paper Presented at IRSPM Conference. Berne, Switzerland, 69 April.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lengyel, G. - Ilonszki, G. (2012): Simulated Democracy and Pseudo-transformational Leadership in Hungary. Historical Social Research 37, No. 1: 120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manning, N. (2001): The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences 67, No. 2: 297312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manning, N. - Shepherd, G. - Blum J. - Laudares, H. (2008): Public Management Reform: Should Latin America Learn from the OECD? OECD.

  • McLaughlin, K. - Osborne, S. P. - Ferlie, E. (eds) (2002): New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry of Public Administration and Justice [MPAJ] (2011): Magyary Zoltán Közigazgatás-fejlesztési Program (MP. 11.0). A Haza üdvére és a Köz szolgálatában. [Magyary Zoltán Public administration development Programme (MP. 11.0) For the salvation of the nation and in the service of the public]. Budapest. http://magyaryprogram.kormany.hu/admin/download/8/34/40000/Magyary-Kozigazgatas-fejlesztesi-Program.pdf, accessed 27 March 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry of Public Administration and Justice [MPAJ] (2012): Magyary Zoltán Public administration development Programme (MP 12.0). For the salvation of the nation and in the service of the public. Budapest. http://magyaryprogram.kormany.hu/admin/download/a/15/50000/Magyary_kozig_fejlesztesi_program_2012_A4_eng_%283%29.pdf, accessed 27 March 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moynihan,D. P. (2006): Ambiguity in Policy Lessons: The Agencification Experience. Public Administration 84, No. 4: 10291050.

  • OECD (1995): Governance in Transition. Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.

  • Ongaro, E. (2009): Public Management Reform and Modernization. Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osborne, D. - Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsey.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pakulski, J. - Higley, J. (2008): Towards Leader Democracy? In: ’t Hart, P. - Uhr, J. (eds): Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices. Canberra: ANU E Press, 4556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pallesen, T. (2011): Privatization. In: Christensen, T. - Lægreid, P. (eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 251264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, B. G. (2011): Governance Responses to the Fiscal Crisis - Comparative Perspectives. Public Money & Management 31, No. 1: 7580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, B. G. - Pierre, J. - Randma-Liiv, T. (2011): Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions? Public Organization Review 11, No. 1: 1327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pogány, I. (2013): The Crisis of Democracy in East Central Europe: The ‘New Constitutionalism’ in Hungary. European Public Law 19, No. 2: 341367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. (1995): Justification by Works or by Faith: Evaluating the New Public Management. Evaluation 1, No. 2: 133154.

  • Pollitt, C. (2002): Clarifying Convergence. Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform. Public Management Review 4, No. 1: 471492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. (2005): Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, No. 1: 2544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. (2007): Convergence or Divergence: What Has Been Happening in Europe? In: Pollitt, C. - van Thiel, S. - Homburg, V. (eds): New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation andalternatives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 1025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. - Summa, H. (1997): Trajectories of Reform: Public Management Change in Four Countries. Public Money - Management 17, No. 1: 718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. - van Thiel, S. - Homburg, V. (eds) (2007): New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation and Alternatives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollitt, C. - Bouckaert, G. (2011): Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ripp, Z. (2010): Egy szürke eminenciás színeváltozásai [The transfiguration of an éminence grise]. Mozgó Világ 36.

  • Schedler, K. - Proeller, I. (2002): The New Public Management. A Perspective from Mainland Europe. In: McLaughlin, K. - Osborne, S. P. - Ferlie, E. (eds): New Public Management: CurrentTrends and Future Prospects. New York, NY: Routledge, 163180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schedler, K. - Proeller, I. (eds) (2007): Cultural Aspects of Public Management Reform. Oxford: Emerald Insight.

  • Siltala, J. (2013): New Public Management: The Evidence-based Worst Practice? Administration & Society 45, No. 4: 468493.

  • ’t Hart, P., Rosenthal, U. - Kouzmin, A. (1993): Crisis Decision Making: The Centralization Thesis Revisited. Administration & Society 25, No. 1: 1245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torres, L. (2004): Trajectories in Public Administration Reforms in European Continental Countries. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63, No. 3: 99112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toubeau, S. - Wagner, M. (2013): Explaining Party Positions on Decentralization. British Journal of Political Science 45, No. 1: 97119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van de Walle, S. - Hammerschmid, G. (2011): Coordinating for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future. COCOPS Working Paper 1.

  • Walker, R. M. - Brewer, G. A. - Boyne, G. A. - Avellaneda, C. N. (2011): Market Orientation and Public Service Performance: New Public Management Gone Mad? Public AdministrationReview 71, No. 5: 707717.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zavattaro, S. M. (2013): Management Movements and Phases of the Image: Potential for Closing the Loop. Administration & Society 45, No. 1: 97118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access
Purchase per Title  

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 43
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)