View More View Less
  • 1 University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic
  • 2 University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic
  • 3 University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic
Restricted access

The attention and support that R&D receives from economists and politicians reflects its importance as a key element of competitiveness and growth in advanced economies. But the real effect of policy upon public support depends on the technological level and structure of the economy and on the ability of beneficiaries to use the support effectively. We should also ask whether the current measurement of R&D outcomes and their subsequent assessment actually reflects real-world situations. The paper presents results of a research focused on the effectiveness of R&D subsidies on the performance of private enterprises in the Czech Republic. We deliberately focus on financial data and compare beneficiaries with unsuccessful applicants using techniques of counterfactual analysis. Although supported actors exhibit higher values of certain variables like assets, personnel expenditures or value added, these cannot be claimed to be the result of R&D support. These findings suggest the very limited effectiveness of R&D support to private actors in the Czech Republic, at least in the short run.

  • Aghion, P.Howitt, P. (1992): A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica 60(2): 323351.

  • Aghion, P.Howitt, P. (1998): On the Macroeconomic Effects of Major Technological Change. In: Helpman, E. (ed.): General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barlevy, G. (2007): On the Cyclicality of Research and Development. American Economic Review 97(4): 11311164.

  • Bondonio, D. (2014): Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Enterprise Support Programmes. Evidence from a Decade of Subsidies to Italian Firm. European D.G.Regio Research, Grant: Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Cohesion Policy. Work Package 1: Examples from Enterprise Support.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cadil, J.Petkovova, L.Kaplanova, V. (2013): Human Capital and Regional Development –Structural Analysis. In: Loster, T.Pavelka, T. (eds): International Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague: Czech Republic

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Correa, P.Andros, L.Borja-Vega, Ch. (2013): The Impact of Government Support on Firm R&D Investments –A Meta Analysis. Policy Research Working Paper 6532. World Bank, Entrepreneurship and Innovation unit.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • David, P. A.Hall, B. H.Toole, A. A. (2000): Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy 29(4–5): 497529.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dinopoulus, E.Thompson, P. (1998): Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3(4): 313335.

  • EUROSTAT (2012): Science, Technology and Innovation in Europe. 2012 edition.

  • Griliches, Z. (1994): Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint. American Economic Review 84(1): 123.

  • Grossman, G. M.Helpman, E. (1991): Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. Review of Economic Studies 58(1): 4361.

  • Ha, J.Howitt, P. (2007): Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39(4): 733774.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinrich, C.Maffioli, A.Vázquez, G. (2010): A Primer for Applying Propensity Score Matching. IDB Impact Evaluation Guidelines.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaruzelski, B. – Dehoff^K. – Bordia, R. (2005): The Global Innovation 1000: Smart Spenders. Strategy and Business 41/2005.

  • Jaruzelski, B.Staack, V.Goehle, B. (2014): The Global Innovation 1000: Proven Paths to Innovation Success. Strategy and Business, 77/2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, C. I. (1995a): Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2): 495525.

  • Jones, C. I. (1995b): R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 103(3): 759784.

  • Khandker, S.Koolwal, G.Samad, H. (2010): Handbook on Impact Evaluation, Quantitative Methods and Practicies. The World Bank 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleiknecht, A.Montfort, K.Brouwer, E. (2002): The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11(2): 109121

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kortum, S. (1997): Research, Patenting, and Technological Change. Econometrica 65(6): 13891419.

  • Kristkova, Z. (2013): Analysis of Private R&D Effects in a CGE Model with Capital Varieties: The Case of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 63(3): 262287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry of Industry and Trade (2011): Back to the Top –International Competitiveness Strategy for the Czech Republic 2012-2020.

  • OECD (2007): Innovation and Growth. Rationale for an Innovation Strategy.

  • OECD (2011): OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011.

  • OECD (2012): OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012.

  • Peretto, P. (1998): Technological Change and Population Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3(4): 283311.

  • Pessoa, A. (2010): R&D and Economic Growth: How Strong is the Link?. Economics Letters 107(2): 152154.

  • Ravallion, M. (2008): Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs. In: Schultz, T. P.Strauss, J. (eds.): Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romer, P. M. (1990): Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 71102.

  • Rousseeuw, P. J.Leroy, A. M. (2005): Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Segerstrom, P. S. (1998): Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects. American Economic Review 88(5): 12901310.

  • Sylwester, K. (2001): R&D and Economic Growth. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 13(4): 7184.

  • Wicklin, R. (2010): Statistical programming in SAS with SAS/IML software. SAS Press Program.

  • Zachariadis, M. (2003): R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects. Canadian Journal of Economics 36(3): 566586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation