The collapse of one-party dictatorship and centrally planned economy based on state ownership opened up the pathways for the formation of different postsocialist systems. Among other variants in a certain number of postsocialist states, democratic capitalism could emerge. Recently the system of postsocialist capitalism has been going through the process of regression leading to a distorted and defective democracy and capitalism in some postsocialist countries. This essay reviews the literature on the relationship of democracy and capitalism in order to contribute to the creation of a theoretical framework for the analysis of the regression of postsocialist democratic capitalism. In the paper the argument is made that for the explanation of the regression of democratic capitalism, the structural analysis of postsocialist democratization and marketization should be supplemented with a theory that reflects on the role of political actors, the role of political parties, party competition in this process.
Acemoglu, D. – Johnson, S. – Robinson, J. A. (2004): Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. NBER Working Paper 10481.
Acemoglu, D – Robinson, J. A. (2012): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.
Beetham, D. (1993): Four Theorems about the Market and Democracy. European Journal of Political Research 23(2): 187–201.
Dahl, R. A. (1993): Why All Democratic Countries Have Mixed Economies. In: Chapman, J. W. – Shapiro, I. (eds): Democratic Community: NOMOS XXXV. New York: New York University Press, pp. 259–282.
Downs, A. (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Enyedi, Z. (2016): Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization. The Role of Party Politics in De-Democratization. Problems of Post-Communism 63(4): 210–220.
Frye, T. (2002): The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World. World Politics 54(3): 308–337.
Frye, T. M. (2010): Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Greskovits, B. (1998): The Political Economy of Protest and Patience. East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Greskovits, B. (2000): Rival Views of Postcommunist Market Society. The Path-Dependence of Transitology. In: Dobry, M. (ed.): Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 19–47.
Greskovits, B. (2015): The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe. Global Policy 6(1): 28–37.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2006): Authoritarian Determinants of Democratic Party Competition. The Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe. Party Politics 12(3): 415–437.
Hellman, J. S. (1998): Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50(2): 203–234.
Hirschman, A. O. (1992): Rival Views of Market Society. In: Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 105–141.
Kitschelt, H. (2003): Accounting for Postcommunist Regime Diversity. What Counts as a Good Cause? In: Ekiert, G. – Hanson, S. E. (eds.): Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–86.
Kornai, J. (1992): The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kornai J. (2000): What the Change of the System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 27–42.
Kornai J. (2016): The System Paradigm Revisited. Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Region. Acta Oeconomica (66)4: 547–596.
Lindblom, C. E. (1977): Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Merkel, W. (2004): Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization 11(5): 33–58.
Moore, B. (1966): Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
North, D. C. – Wallis, J. J. – Weingast, B. R. (2006): A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. NBER Working Paper 12795.
North, D. C. – Wallis, J. J. – Weingast, B. R. (2009): Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Offe, C. (1987): Democracy against the Welfare State? Structural Foundations of Neoconservative Political Opportunities. Political Theory 15(4): 501–537.
Offe, C. (1991): Capitalism by Democratic Design? Social Research 58(4): 865–893.
Olson, M. (1993): Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review 87(3): 567–576.
Przeworski, A. (1991): Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A. – Wallerstein, M. (1988): Structural Dependence of the State on Capital. The American Political Science Review 82(1): 11–29.
Staniszkis, J. (1991): The Dynamics of the Breakthrough in Eastern Europe: The Polish Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Székely-Doby, A. (2016): Járadékteremtés és az áldemokráciák [Rent Creation and Pseudo-Democracies]. Közgazdasági Szemle 63(5): 501–523.
Vachudova, M. A. (2005): Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vachudova, M. A. (2008): Centre-Right Parties and Political Outcomes in East Central Europe. Party Politics 14(4): 387–405.
Zakaria, F. (1997): The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–43.