Authors:
Miklós Lukovics University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

Search for other papers by Miklós Lukovics in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Erik Fisher Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

Search for other papers by Erik Fisher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

While technological innovation is a core element of efforts to increase public welfare, innovators are rarely trained to take the societal dimensions of innovation into account in a systematic manner. Responsible innovation has emerged within policy discourses worldwide to address this challenge. Implementing responsible innovation in daily practices, however, requires addressing both the multidisciplinary and the culturally situated nature of innovation processes. Effectiveness of Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) has been tested, but primarily only in developed countries, raising questions about how well it works in innovation and cultural settings differing from Western cultures. Therefore, this study analyzes the possibities of institutionalizing responsible innovation in an Eastern European country, namely in Hungary. For this investigation, we conducted STIR-pilots in two Hungarian natural science research groups. The findings show that though the original STIR method can be adapted to support responsible innovation practices in Hungary, the differences in the innovation environment and culture (such as grant-driven innovation; lack of trust; less knowledge on responsible innovation; lack of law on the societical impacts of research and innovaton) require methodological modifications in order to improve STIR’s effectiveness.

  • Aerni, P. (2005): Stakeholder Attitudes Towards the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops in South Africa. Environmental Science & Policy 8(5): 464476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Apak, S.Atay, E. (2015): Global Competitiveness in the EU through Green Innovation Technologies and Knowledge Production. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 181: 207217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barben, D.Fisher, E.Selin, C.Guston, D. H. (2008): Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. In: Hackett, E. J.Amsterdamska, O.Lynch, M. E.Wajcman, J. (wds.): New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Boston: MIT Press, pp. 9791000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bennet, I.Sarewitz, D. (2006): Too Little, Too Late? Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States. Science as Culture 15(4): 309326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bien, H.-JBen, T.-M.Wang, K.-F. (2014): Trust Relationships within R&D Networks: A Case Study from the Biotechnological Industry. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 16(3): 354373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buzás, N.Lukovics, M. (2015): A felelosségteljes innovációról [Responsible Innovation]. Közgazdasági Szemle 62(4): 438456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buzás, N.Lukovics, M. (2016): Southern European Perspectives. In: von Schomberg, R. (ed.): Handbook of Responsible Innovation – a Global Resource. Edgar Elgar Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chorus, C.van Wee, B.Zwart, S. (2012): TPM Catalogue. Concepts, Theories, Methods. Delft: Delft University of Technology.

  • Ciocanel, A. B.Pavelescu, F. M. (2015): Innovation and Competitiveness in European Context. Procedia Economics and Finance 32: 728737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dosi, G.Grazzi, M.Moschella, M. (2015): Technology and Costs in International Competitiveness: From Countries and Sectors to Firms. Research Policy 44(10): 17951814.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EC (2016): European Innovation Scoreboard. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Edquist, C. (2005): Systems of Innovation Approaches. Their Emergence and Characteristics. In: Edquist, C. (ed): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London – New York: Routledge, pp. 135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eurobarometer (2011): Consumer Understanding of Labels and the Safe use of Chemicals. Report, Special Eurobarometer 360.

  • Eurobarometer (2013): Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology. Report, Special Eurobarometer 401.

  • Farkas, B. (2011): The Central and Eastern European Model of Capitalism. Post-Communist Economies 23(1): 1534.

  • Farkas, B. (2016): Models of Capitalism in the European Union: Post-crisis Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fisher, E. (2007): Integrating Science and Society in the Laboratory. Presentation. Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, NM.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, E.Mahajan, R. L.Mitcham, C. (2006): Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26(6): 485496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, E.Maricle, G. (2014): Higher-level Responsiveness? Socio-technical Integration within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting. Science and Public Policy, 28 April 2014, 114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, E.Schuurbiers, D. (2013): Midstream Modulation. In: Doorn, N.Schuurbiers, D.van de Poel, I.Gorman, M. E. (eds): Opening up the Laboratory: Approaches for Early Engagement with New Technology, Wiley-Blackwell, 97110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, E.Slade, C.Anderson, D.Bozeman, B. (2010): The Public Value of Nanotechnology? Scientometrics 85(1): 2939.

  • Fisher, E.O’Rourke, M.Kennedy, E. B.Evans, R.Gorman, M.Seager, T.† (2015): Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-Technical Collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 3961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flipse, S. M.van der Sanden, M. C. A.Osseweijer, P. (2013): Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining what is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(3): 11411164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flipse, S. M.van der Sanden, M. C. A.Osseweijer, P. (2014): Improving Industrial R&D Practices with Social and Ethical Aspects: Aligning Key Performance Indicators with Social and Ethical Aspects in Food Technology R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 85(6): 185197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flipse, S. M.Vrielink, J. O.van der Sanden, M. C. (2015): Building Interactive Communication Tools to Support Interdisciplinary Responsible Innovation. Journal of Innovation Management 3(4): 119-133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guston, D. H. (2014): Understanding Anticipatory Governance. Social Studies of Science 44(2): 219243.

  • Guston, D. H.Sarewitz, D. (2002): Real-Time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society 24(1-2): 93109.

  • Havas, A.Nyíri, L. (eds.) (2007): A magyar nemzeti innovációs rendszer [The Hungarian Innovation System]. Háttértanulmány az OECD 2007/2008. évi innovációs országjelentése számára. Budapest: NKTH.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inzelt, A.Csonka, L. (2014): Responsible Science in Societies. In: Buzás, N.Lukovics, M. (eds.): Responsible innovation. Szeged: JATEPress, 5772.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lengyel, B.Leydessdorff, L. (2011): Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level. Regional Studies 45(5): 677693.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lengyel, I. (2009): Knowledge-based Local Economic Development for Enhancing Competitiveness in Lagging Areas of Europe: The Case of the University of Szeged. In: Varga, A. (ed): Universities, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Development: Geography, Entrepreneurship and Policy. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 322349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lopez, R.Carrau, J. G. (2002): The GMO Regulation in the EU and the Commercial Conflict with the United States. Paper provided by European Association of Agricultural Economists in its series 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lukovics, M.Buzás, N.Huntingford, J.Chiocca, M.Bubbolini, G.Udvari, B. (2016a): Facilitating Responsible Innovation in the South-East European Countries. Journal of Responsible Innovation (under review)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lukovics, M.Buzás, N.Huntingford, J.Molnár, G. (2016b): Felelosségteljes innováció a Délkelet-európai országokban [Responsible Innovation in Southeast European Countries]. In Lengyel, I.Nagy, B. (eds): Térségek versenyképessége, intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodása. Szeged: JATEPress, 6278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Macnaghten, P.Owen, R.Stilgoe, J.Wynne, B.Azevedo, A.de Campos, A.Chilvers, J.Dagnino, R.di Giulio, G.Frow, E.Garvey, B.Groves, C.Hartley, S.Knobel, M.Kobayashi, E.Lehtonen, M.Lezaun, J.Mello, L.Monteiro, M.Pamplona da Costa, J.Rigolin, C.Rondani, B.Staykova, M.Taddei, R.Till, C.Tyfield, D.Wilford, S.Velho, L. (2014): Responsible Innovation across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(2): 191199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martus, B. (2015): Növekedjünk vagy foglalkoztassunk? Az amerikai gazdasági növekedés problémája [Growth or Employment? The Problem of American Economic Growth]. Pénzügyi Szemle 60(2): 254274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nielsen, C. P.Thierfelder, K.Robinson, S. (2003): Consumer Preferences and Trade in Genetically Modified Foods. Journal of Policy Modeling 25(8): 777794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD (2011): Society at a Glance 2011: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Owen, R.Baxter, D.Maynard, T.Depledge, M. (2009): Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation. Environmental Science & Technology 43(18): 69026906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Owen, R.Macnaghten, P.Stilgoe, J. (2012): Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Panzda, K.Ellwood, E. (2013): Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42(5): 11121125.

  • Ravesteijn, W.Liu, Y.Yan, P. (2015): Responsible Innovation in Port Development: The Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 and the Dalian Dayao Bay Extension Projects. Water Science & Technology 72(5): 665677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rip, A. (2005): Technology Assessment as Part of the Co-Evolution of Nanotechnology and Society : the Thrust of the TA Programme in NanoNed. Paper presented to the Conference on Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society, Marburg, Germany.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodríguez, H.Fisher, E.Schuurbiers, D. (2013): Integrating Science and Society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in Project-level Solicitations. Research Policy 42(5): 11261137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schomberg, R. von (2012): Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Dusseldorp, M.Beecroft, R. (eds.): Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer Vs Verlag Fur Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 3961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schuurbiers, D. (2011): What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 769788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schuurbiers, D.Fisher, E. (2009): Lab-scale Intervention. EMBO Reports. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research 10(5): 424427.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Setiawan, A. D.Singh, R. (2015): Responsible Innovation in Practice: The Adaption of Solar PV Telecom Towers in Indonesia. In: Koops, B.-J.Oosterlaken, I.Romijn, H.Swierstra, T.van den Hoven, J. (eds.): Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 225244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stilgoe, J.Owen, R.Macnaghten, P. (2013): Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42(9): 15681580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutcliffe, H. (2013): A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. London: Matter.

  • Taebi, B.Correljé, A.Cuppen, E.Dignum, M.Pesch, a U. (2014): Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(1): 118124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tihon, A.Ingham, M. (2011): The Societal System and Responsible Innovations: Freeing Sustainable Development from a Deadlock. Journal of Innovation Economics 2(8): 1131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Várady, J.Tóth, M.Fogarasi, J. (2005): Merre tovább? A Magyar vegyipar jövoképe. A Magyar vegyipart érinto szakképzés, felnottképzés fejlesztésének problémái, lehetoségei [The Future Image of the Hungarian Chemical Industry]. Available: http://www.vdsz.hu/files/45/22/vegyip_szakkepzes.pdf, accessed 4 December 2016)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vigani, M.Raimondi, V.Olper, A. (2010): GMO Regulations, International Trade and the Imperialism of Standards. Paper provided by LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven in its series LICOS Discussion Papers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vilmányi, M. (2011): The Relationship Performance in the Field of University-Industrial R and D Cooperation. In: Hetesi, E.Kürtösi, Zs. (eds.): Diversity of Research at the Szeged Institute of Business Studies. Szeged: JATEPress, pp. 7595.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Voeten, J.de Haan, J.de Groot, G.Roome, N. (2015): Understanding Responsible Innovation in Small Producers’ Clusters in Vietnam through Actor-Network Theory. European Journal of Development Research 27(2): 289307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zouaghi, F.Sánchez, M. (2016): Has the Global Financial Crisis Had Different Effects on Innovation Performance in the Agri-Food Sector by Comparison to the Rest of the Economy? Trends in Food Science & Technology 50(4): 230242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed
not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed
not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
15
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.217
Scimago Quartile Score

Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.5
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Sociology and Political Science 602/1415 (57th PCTL)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 131/279 (53rd PCTL)
Industrial Relations 31/57 (46th PCTL)
Public Administration 3126/213 (41th PCTL)
Business and International Management 302/436 (30th PCTL)
Strategy and Management 343/473 (27th PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
0.468

 

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,196
Scimago Quartile Score Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Industrial Relations (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science (Q3)
Business and International Management (Q4)
Public Administration (Q4)
Strategy and Management (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,2
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Sociology and Political Science 626/1345 (Q2)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 131/260 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 35/57 (Q3)
Public Administration 120/190 (Q3)
Business and International Management 292/423 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 340/456 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,270

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article with enough waivers
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)