View More View Less
  • 1 Corvinus University of Budapest
  • | 2 Corvinus University of Budapest
Restricted access

Companies of different size and sector regularly publish sustainability reports in order to record and disseminate their activities aimed at contributing to sustainable development and to refl ect their corporate social responsibility. From the various existing suggestions for such reports, the principles and guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative are most widely used – at least among large companies. The very detailed guidelines and indicator system aim at supporting companies to provide relevant, balanced, comparable, accurate, timely, clear and reliable information on corporate activities and performance, while focusing on sustainability-context and stakeholder inclusiveness in their “non-financial” reporting. However, based on research into the content and quality of non-financial reporting, it is difficult to clearly conclude just how comparable and transparent the reports are, as well as to decide whether they truly refl ect the sustainability performance of the reporting companies. The paper provides a literature review and a qualitative analysis on the reporting practice of 37 large companies.

  • Aktaş, R.Kayalidere, K.Karğin, M. (2013): Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Analysis of Sustainability Reports in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance 5(3): 113125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldassarre, F.Campo, R. (2016): Sustainability as a Marketing Tool: To Be or to Appear to Be? Business Horizons 59: 421429.

  • Bárth-Fehér, S. (2012): Fenntarthatóság a hazai vállalati gyakorlatban – a „Versenyben a világgal” kutatási program 2009. évi kérdőíves felmérés eredményeinek vizsgálata [Sustainability in Practice of Domestic Companies – Analysis of the Survey Results of 2009, as Part of the “In Competition with the World” Research Program]. Vezetéstudomány 43(10): 4455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, M.Bianchi, L.Frey, M.Passetti, E. (2015): Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Identity: Action Research Evidence in an Italian Retailing Cooperative. Business Ethics: A Euro pean Review 24(1): 5272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beare, D.Buslovich, R.Searcy, C. (2014): Linkages between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Public Policy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21: 336350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calu, A.Negrei, C.Calu, D. A.Avram, V. (2015): Reporting of Non-Financial Performance Indicators – A Useful Tool for a Sustainable Marketing Strategy. Amfiteatru Economic 17(40): 977993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daub, C.-H. (2007): Assessing the Quality of Sustainability Reporting: An Alternative Methodological Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 15: 7585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Efimova, O.Batyrova, N. (2013): Sustainable Development Reporting: International and Russian Experience. Review of Business and Economics Studies 1(1): 243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elkington, J. (1997): Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of Twenty-First Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.

  • Ernst and Young (2015): Investment Rules 2.0: Nonfinancial and ESG Reporting Trends, Global Institutional Investor Survey (2015).

  • European Commission (2014): Directive 2014/95/EU on Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, M. (1970): The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine 13(32–33): 122124.

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2013): G4 Sustainability Report Guidelines – Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures. Amsterdam: GRI.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Global Reporting Initiative (2016): First Global Sustainability Reporting Standards Set to Transform Business. Amsterdam: GRI.

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2017): About GRI. Amsterdam: GRI.

  • Gomes, S. F. – Pereira Eugénió, T. C.Branco, M. C. (2015): Sustainability Reporting and Assurance in Portugal. Corporate Governance 15(3): 281292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harangozó, G. (2008): A környezeti teljesítményértékelés módszerei [Methods of Environmental Performance Evaluation]. Vezetéstudomány 39(2): 3850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harangozó, G.Széchy, A. Z.Zilahy, G. (2016): A fenntarthatósági lábnyom megközelítések szerepe a vállalatok fenntarthatósági szempontú teljesítményértékelésében. [The Role of Sustainability Footprint Approaches in Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Companies] Vezetéstudomány 57(7): 213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herzig, C.Schaltegger, S. (2006): Corporate Sustainability Reporting. In: Schaltegger, S.Bennett, M.Burritt, R. (eds): Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaksson, R.Steimle, U. (2009): What does GRI-Reporting Tell Us about Corporate Sustainability? The TQM Journal 21(2): 168181.

  • James, M. L. (2015): Sustainability Reporting by Small and Midsize Companies – Methods, Nature and Extent of Reporting. Business Studies Journal 7(2): 117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knebel, S.Seele, P. (2015): Quo vadis GRI? A (Critical) Assessment of GRI G3.1 A+ Non-Financial Reports and Implications for Credibility and Standardisation. Corporate Communications: An international Journal 20(2): 196212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kozlowski, A.Searcy, C.Bardeck, M. (2015): Corporate Sustainability Reporting in the Apparel Industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64(3): 377397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KPMG (2002): KPMG International Study of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002. Amsterdam: Graduate Business School.

  • Lozano, R.Huisingh, D. (2011): Inter-Linking Issues and Dimensions in Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(2–3): 99107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lukács, R. (2015): A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás kommunikációjának elvei és eszközrendszere a marketingben [Principles and Tools of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication in Marketing]. Vezetéstudomány 46(9–10): 211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maharaj, R.Herremans, M. I. (2008): Shell Canada: over a Decade of Sustainable Development Reporting Experience. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 8(3): 235247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moravcikova, K.Stefanikova, Ľ.Rypakova, M. (2015): CSR Reporting as an Important Tool of CSR Communication. Procedia Economics and Finance 26: 332338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oliveira, L.Rodrigues, L. L. (2010): Intellectual Capital Reporting in Sustainability Reports. Journal of Intellectual Capital 11(4): 575594.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perrini, F. (2006): The Practitioner’s Perspective on Non-Financial Reporting. California Management Review 48(2): 73103.

  • PWC (2011): Pharma 2020: Supplying the Future. Which Path will You Take? London: PWC

  • Roca, L. C.Searcy, C. (2012): An Analysis of Indicators Disclosed in Corporate Sustainability Reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 20(1): 103118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNEP (2015): Stockholm 1972 – Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. UNEP.

  • WBCSD (2002): Sustainable Development Reporting: Striking the Balance, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. London: Earthprint.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zilahy, GKovács, L. (2012): Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Hungary – the Special Case of the ICT Sector. In: EMAN-EU 2008 Conference. Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Accounting – Measuring and Managing Business Benefits. Budapest: AULA

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.
 
The Open Access statement together with the description of the Copyright and License Policy are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,196
Scimago Quartile Score Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) (Q3)
Industrial Relations (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science (Q3)
Business and International Management (Q4)
Public Administration (Q4)
Strategy and Management (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,2
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Sociology and Political Science 626/1345 (Q2)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 131/260 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 35/57 (Q3)
Public Administration 120/190 (Q3)
Business and International Management 292/423 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 340/456 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,270

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,157
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q4
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q4
Industrial Relations Q4
Public Administration Q4
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
103/117=0,9
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 305/399 (Q4)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137/243 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 40/54 (Q3)
Public Administration 116/165 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 665/1269 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 351/440 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,171
Scopus
Cites
157
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 148
Days from acceptance to publication 50

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,228
Scimago
Quartile Score
Business and International Management Q3
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Q3
Industrial Relations Q3
Public Administration Q3
Sociology and Political Science Q3
Strategy and Management Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
87/110=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Business and International Management 286/394 (Q3)
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 125/228 (Q3)
Industrial Relations 38/58 (Q3)
Public Administration 114/157 (Q3)
Sociology and Political Science 645/1243 (Q3)
Strategy and Management 330/427 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,308
Scopus
Cites
132
Scopus
Documents
22

 

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article with enough waivers
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)