This paper highlights the need to limit resource use, especially energy resource use in the global economy. First, the scientific literature on capping resource use in light of three primary issues (sustainable scale, fair distribution, efficient allocation) is reviewed, as ecological economics suggests that these concerns must be addressed to move towards sustainability. Second, the paper examines how several tools proposed for capping energy use can or cannot deliver effective responses to the three primary concerns in ecological economics. Finally, recommendations are provided for future research on understanding and analysing energy capping tools to effectively achieve both environmental and social goals.
Alcott, B. (2009): Impact Caps: Why Population, Affluence and Technology Strategies should be Abandoned. Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 552–560.
Archer, R. A. (2015): Carbon Pricing: The Unexamined Case for the Carbon Fee and Dividend. Pasadena: Citizens’ Climate Lobby: Pasadena Foothills.
Bányai, O. (2014): The European Union Regulation Concerning the Energy Consumption of Buildings – An Ecological Point of View. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering 4(2): 111–116
Barrett, J. – Peters, G. – Wiedmann, T. – Scott, K. – Lenzen, M. – Roelich, K. – le Quéré, C. (2013): Consumption-Based GHG Emission Accounting: A UK Case Study. Climate Policy 13(4): 451–470 BBC (2015): Record Numbers Use Food Banks - Trussell Trust, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk- (3240)(6120), accessed: 22.04.(2015).
Bouzarovski, S. – Petrova, S. (2015): A Global Perspective on Domestic Energy Deprivation: Overcoming the Energy Poverty–Fuel Poverty Binary. Energy Research & Social Science 10: 31–40.
Bye, T. – Bruvoll, A. (2008): Multiple Instruments to Change Energy Behaviour: The Emperor’s New Clothes? Energy Efficiency 1: 373–386.
Centre for Sustainable Energy (2008): Distributional Impacts of Personal Carbon Trading. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Chamberlin, S. – Maxey, L. – Hurth, V. (2015): Reconciling Scientific Reality with Realpolitik: Moving beyond Carbon Pricing to TEQs – An Integrated, Economy-Wide Emissions Cap. Carbon Management 5(4): 411–427.
Clark, D. (2011a): Carbon Cuts by Developed Countries Cancelled out by Imported Goods. The Guardian, 25 April.
Clark, D. (2011b): New Data on Imports and Exports Turns Map of Carbon Emission on Its Head. The Guardian, 3 May.
Clarke, J. – Heinonen, J. – Ottelin, J. (2017): Emissions in a Decarbonised Economy? Global Lessons from a Consumption-Based Investigation of Iceland Using MRIO Analysis. ESEE (2017) Conference.
Colt, S. (2015): Benefits and Costs to Rural Alaska Households from a Carbon Fee and Dividend Program. Anchorage: University of Alaska Anchorage.
Compton, T. (2010): Common Cause: The Case for Working with Our Cultural Values. Woking: WWF-UK.
Crals, E. – Vereeck, L. (2005): Taxes, Tradable Rights and Transaction Costs. European Journal of Law and Economics 20: 199–223.
Csutora, M. (2011): From Eco-Efficiency to Eco-Effectiveness? The Policy-Performance Paradox. Society and Economy 33(1): 161–181
Daly, H. (1992): Allocation, Distribution, and Scale: towards an Economics that Is Efficient, Just, and Sustainable. Ecological Economics 6: 185–193.
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (2014): Statistics: Rural Poverty. London: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
Dresner, S. – Ekins, P. (2004): The Distributional Impacts of Economic Instruments to Limit. PSI Research Discussion Paper 19.
EEA (2015): The European Environment State and Outlook (2015). Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
Ehrlich, P. R. – Holdren, J. P. (1971): Impact of Population Growth. Science 171: 1212–1217.
Eisenmenger, N. – Plank, B. – Schaffartzik, A. – Wiedenhofer, D. (2017): Evaluating Austrian Resource Efficiency. Material and Energy Use in Relation to CO2 Emissions, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services both from a Production- and Consumption-Based Perspective. ESEE (2017) Conference.
European Commission (2016a): Consumption of Energy. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2016b): EU Final Energy Consumption below 2020 Targets. Brussels: Euro pean Commission.
European Commission (2016c): Europe 2020 Indicators - Climate Change and Energy. Brussels: European Commission.
Fleming, D. – Chamberlin, S. (2011): TEQs - Tradable Energy Quotas: A Policy Framework for Peak Oil and Climate Change. London: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Peak Oil and the Lean Economy Connection.
Gyulai, I. (2010): Proposed Climate Change Act for Hungary Based on Energy Quota System. Budapest: NSC-Friends of the Earth Hungary.
Herpainé, Márkus Á. – Gyuris, T. – Jász, K. – Ladányi, E. (2009): Klímatörvény szociális hatástanulmány. [The Social Assessment of the Hungarian Climate Bill Proposal] Working paper.
Hoffmeister-Tóth, Á. – Kelemen, K. – Piskóti, M. (2011): Environmentally Conscious Consumption Patterns in Hungarian Households. Society and Economy 33(1): 51–68.
Jordan, G. – Fortin, M. (2002): Scale and Topology in the Ecological Economics Sustainability Paradigm. Ecological Economics 41: 361–366.
Kanemoto, K. – Moran, D. – Herwich, E. D. (2016): Mapping the Carbon Footrpint of Nations. Environmental Science and Technology 50: 10511–10517.
Kurland, N. B. – McCaffrey, S. J. (2013): The Localism Movement: Shared and Emergent Values. Journal of Environmental Sustainability 41: 361–366.
Lawn, P. A. (2001): Scale, Prices, and Biophysical Assessments. Ecological Economics 38: 369–382.
Levin, K. – Cashore, B. – Bernstein, S. – Auld, G. (2012): Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Constraining Our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change. Policy Sciences 45: 123–152.
Li, J. – Fan, J. – Zhao, D. – Wang, S. (2014): Allowance Price and Distributional Effects under a Personal Carbon Trading (PTC) Scheme. Journal of Cleaner Production 103: 1–11.
Lorek, S. – Vadovics, E. (2016): Sustainable Consumption and Social Justice in a Constrained World. SCORAI Europe Workshop Proceedings, August 29–30, 2016, Budapest, Hungary.
Luda, S. (2013): Sustainable Rural Entrepreneurship: A Case in Hungary. Journal of Environmental Sustainability 1(1): Article 7.
Malghan, D. (2010): On the Relationship between Scale, Allocation, and Distribution. Ecological Economics 69: 2261–2270.
Malthus, T. (1798): An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: Joseph Johnson.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2009): Socially Sustainable Economic De-Growth. Development and Change 40: 1099–1119.
OECD (2015a): Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2015b): In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
Pelletier, N. (2010): Of Laws and Limits: An Ecological Economic Perspective on Redressing the Failure of Contemporary Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Change 20: 220–228.
Perrels, A. (2010): User Response and Equity Considerations Regarding Emission Cap-and-Trade Schemes for Travel. Energy Efficiency 3: 149–165.
Pogutz, S. – Micale, V. (2011): Sustainable Consumption and Production: An Effort to Reconcile the Determinants of Environmental Impact. Society and Economy 33(1): 29–50.
Polányi, K. (1944): The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Portfolio news (2014): Egyre nő a szegénység Magyarországon [Poverty Keeps Rising in Hungary] http://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/egyre_no_a_szegenyseg_magyarorszagon.(2070)47.html, accessed: 22.04.(2015).
Prakash, A. – Grupta, A. (1994): Are Efficiency, Equity, and Scale Independent? Letter to the Editor. Ecological Economics 10: 89–91.
Rácz, A. D. (2013): Why Invest in Energy Efficiency? The Example of Lighting. Journal of Environmental Sustainability 2(2): Article 1. Renewable energies for eliminating poverty conference recommendation 2009: March 18–21. Pécs, Hungary.
Ricardo, D. (1911): The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Alexandria Governorate: Library of Alexandria.
Rockström, J. – Steffen, W. – Noone, K. – Persson, A. – Chapin, F. S. I. – Lambin, E. – Lenton, T. M. – Scheffer, M. – Folke, C. – Schellnhuber, H. – Nykvist, B. – De Wit, C. A. – Hughes, T. – van der Leeuw, S. – Rodhe, H. – Sorlin, S. – Snyder, P. K. – Costanza, R. – Svedin, U. – Falkenmark, M. – Karlberg, L. – Corell, C. W. – Fabry, V. J. – Hansen, J. – Walker, B. – Liverman, D. – Richardson, K. – Crutzen, P. – Foley, J. (2009): Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): Article 32.
Ropke, I. (2015): Complementary System Perspectives in Ecological Macroeconomics – The Example of Transition Investments during the Crisis. Ecological Economics 121: 237–245.
Spangenberg, J. (2013): Pick Simply the Best: Sustainable Development is about Radical Analysis and Selective Synthesis, Not about Old Wine in New Bottles. Sustainable Development 21: 101–111.
Tombácz, E. – Mozsgai, K. (2009): Az éghajlatvédelmi törvény tervezetének Stratégiai Környezeti-Vizsgálata [The Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Hungarian Climate Bill Proposal] Budapest: Öko Zrt.
Tóth, I. G. (2013): Time Series and Cross Country Variation of Income Inequalities in Europe on the Medium Run: Are Inequality Structures Converging in the Past Three Decades? Gini Policy Paper 3.
WarmFront (2010): Connecting with Communities: The Warm Front Scheme Annual Report 2009/10. London: House of Commons Public Accounts Committee.
Waxman, H. (2009): H.R. 2454 - American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. Washington.
Wetzel, K. R. – Wetzel, J. F. (1995): Sizing the Earth: Recognition of Economic Carrying Capacity. Ecological Economics 12: 13–21.
White, V. – Thumim, J. (2009): Moderating the Distributional Impacts of Personal Carbon Trading. Bristol: Centre for Sustainable Energy.