Author:
Attila Antal Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary Coordinator, Social Theory Research Group, Institute of Political History,, Budapest, Hungary

Search for other papers by Attila Antal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

According to Cas Mudde, we live in a “populist Zeitgeist”. The paper argues that not just the 21st, but also the 20th century is about populism. In the first section I elaborate the theoretical background of populism, which is claimed to be a never-ending phenomenon: here, various notions of populism are analysed; I investigate the relationship between democracy and populism; and I refer to the biopolitical framework of populism (called biopopulism) as well. This theoretical framework will be used to analyse Communist populism in Hungary. I elaborate the populism of the Horthyera (1920-1944) in the context of Communist populism. Then I analyse the case of Communist populism in Hungary (1948-1989) according to the following aspects: in the context of the working class and the bourgeois elite; the biopolitical character of the regime; goulash Communism as populist legitimacy; and the viewpoint of socialist patriotism. The main aspect of Communist populism is summarized at the end of the third section, and I briefly refer to the afterlife of Communist populism as a nostalgic phenomenon. The regimes analysed in this study aimed to govern the entire life of the citizens, which is why biopopulism is a useful analytical concept. The biopopulist framework shows that the investigation of the historical backgrounds of populism is necessary to understand contemporary populist tendencies.

  • Abts, K.Rummens, S. (2007): Populism versus Democracy. Political Studies 55(2): 405424.

  • Agamben, G. (1998): Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Heller-Roazen, D. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2000): Means without End: Notes on Politics. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2005): State of Exception. Translated by Attell, K. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2014): From the State of Control to a Praxis of Destituent Power. ROAR Magazine February 4.

  • Antal, A. (2017): The Political Theories, Preconditions and Dangers of the Governing Populism in Hungary. Czech Journal of Political Science 24(1): 520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balassa, B. (1970): The Economic Reform in Hungary. Economica, New Series 37(145): 122.

  • Benczes, I. (2016): From Goulash Communism to Goulash Populism: The Unwanted Legacy of Hungarian Reform Socialism. Post-Communist Economies 28(2): 146166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brubaker, R. (2009): Rethinking Nationhood: Nation as Institutionalized Form, Practical Category, Contingent Even. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canovan, M. (2002): Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy. In: Mény, Y.Surel, Y. (eds.): Democracies and the Populist Challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp: 2544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, C. (2007): The Prospects for Liberal Nationalism in Post-Leninist States. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De la Torre, C. (2000): Populist Seduction in Latin America. Athens, GA: Ohio University Press.

  • Enyedi, Z. (2016): Paternalist Populism and Illiberal Elitism in Central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies 21(1): 925.

  • Foucault, M. (1990): The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, R. London: Penguin.

  • Foucault, M. (2003): “Society Must Be Defended”, Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Translated by Macey, D. London: Penguin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greskovits, B. (1998): The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012): The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy. Democratization 19(2): 184208.

  • Kazin, M. (1995): The Populist Persuasion. An American History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Laclau, E. (2005a): Populism: What’s in a Name? In: Panizza, F. (ed.): Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 3249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laclau, E. (2005b): On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

  • Lambert, S. (s. a.): The Horthy Era (1920–1944). The Orange Files. https://theorangefiles.hu/thehorthy-era-1920-1944-long/, accessed 31/01/2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lehotay, V. (2012): Measures of Deprivation of Freedom in the Horthy-Era, with Special Regard to anti-Jewish Laws. Doctoral Thesis, University of Miskolc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemke, T. (2011): Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York, London: New York University Press.

  • Lijphart, A. (1999): Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • March, L. (2011): Radical Left Parties in Europe. New York: Routledge.

  • Mény, Y.Surel, Y., eds (2002): Democracies and the Populist Challenge. New York: Palgrave.

  • Moffitt, B.Tormey, S. (2014): Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62(2): 381397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mouffe, C. (2000): The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

  • MSZMP (1956): Az MSZMP Ideiglenes Központi Bizottságának határozata. 1956. december 5. [The Decision of the Temporary Central Committee of the Hungarian Socialist Workers Party, 5 December 1956]. http://mek.oszk.hu/01900/01937/html/szerviz/dokument/msmphats.htm, accessed 22/09/2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mudde, C. (2004): The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 541563.

  • Mudde, C. (2007): Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Müller, J. W. (2016): What is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • O’Donoghue, A. (2015): Sovereign Exception: Notes on the Thought of Giorgio Agamben. Critical Legal Thinking 2 July.

  • Panayotu, P. (2017): Towards a Transnational Populism: A Chance for European Democracy (?) The Case of DiEM25. POPULISMUS Working Papers (5).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Panizza, F. (2005): Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.

  • Pap, M. (2013): “A nép és a szülőföld igaz szeretete”. A szocialista hazafiság fogalma a Kádár-rendszerben [“The True Love of the People and the Homeland”. The Concept of Socialist Patriotism in the Kádár System]. Politikatudományi Szemle 22(1): 6883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pappas, T. S. (2014): Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary. Government and Opposition 49(1): 123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pappas, T. S. (2015): Modern Populism: Research Advances, Conceptual and Methodological Pitfalls, and the Minimal Definition. Oxford Research Encyclopaedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pew Research Center (2009): End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations. http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/11/02/end-of-communism-cheered-but-now-with-morereservations /, accessed 31/01/2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rainer, J. M.Somlai, K. (2007): The 1956 Hungarian Revolution and the Soviet Bloc Countries: Reactions and Repercussions. Budapest: The Institute for the History of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, Historical Archives of the Hungarian State Security.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romsics, I. (1999): Hungary in the Twentieth Century. Budapest: Corvina.

  • Tőkés, R. L. (1996): Hungary’s Negotiated Revolution: Economic Reform, Social Change and Political Succession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weyland, K. (2001): Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34(1): 122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wike, R. (2010): Hungary Dissatisfied with Democracy, but Not Its Ideals. Pew Research Center, Pew Global Attitudes Project. 7 April. http://www.pewglobal.org/2010/04/07/hungarydissatisfied-with-democracy-but-not-its-ideals/, accessed 31/01/2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editor-in-chief: Balázs SZENT-IVÁNYI

Co-Editors:

  • Péter MARTON (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • István KÓNYA (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • László SAJTOS (The University of Auckland)
  • Gábor VIRÁG (University of Toronto)

Associate Editors:

  • Tamás BOKOR (Corvinus University, Budapest)
  • Sándor BOZÓKI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Bronwyn HOWELL (Victoria University of Wellington)
  • Hintea CALIN (Babeş-Bolyai University)
  • Christian EWERHART (University of Zürich)
  • Clemens PUPPE (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • Zsolt DARVAS (Bruegel)
  • Szabina FODOR (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Sándor GALLAI (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László GULÁCSI (Óbuda University)
  • Dóra GYŐRFFY (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • György HAJNAL (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Krisztina KOLOS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Alexandra KÖVES (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Lacina LUBOR (Mendel University in Brno)
  • Péter MEDVEGYEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Miroslava RAJČÁNIOVÁ (Slovak University of Agriculture)
  • Ariel MITEV (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Éva PERPÉK (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Petrus H. POTGIETER (University of South Africa)
  • Sergei IZMALKOV (MIT Economics)
  • Anita SZŰCS (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • László TRAUTMANN (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Trenton G. SMITH (University of Otago)
  • György WALTER (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán CSEDŐ (Corvinus University Budapest)
  • Zoltán LŐRINCZI (Ministry of Human Capacities)

Society and Economy
Institute: Corvinus University of Budapest
Address: Fővám tér 8. H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 482 5406
E-mail: balazs.szentivanyi@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • DOAJ
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • International Political Science Abstracts
  • JSTOR
  • SCOPUS
  • RePEc
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2024  
Scopus  
CiteScore  
CiteScore rank  
SNIP  
Scimago  
SJR index 0.26
SJR Q rank Q3

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.5
CiteScore rank Q2 (Sociology and Political Science)
SNIP 0.496
Scimago  
SJR index 0.243
SJR Q rank Q3

Society and Economy
Publication Model Gold Open Access
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article with enough waivers
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Sufficient number of full waiver available. Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Gold Open Access

Society and Economy
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Founder's
Address
H-1093 Budapest, Hungary Fővám tér 8.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1588-9726 (Print)
ISSN 1588-970X (Online)