Author: Agnieszka Szpak
View More View Less
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $576.00

The armed conflict in Ukraine shows how difficult it sometimes is to clearly identify the nature of armed conflict. This is connected primarily with the lack of the full range of information on facts – knowledge of which is essential for determining the degree of control by a third country (Russia) over non-State party to an armed conflict (Ukrainian separatists). It is especially difficult to make such an assessment while armed conflict continues and is undoubtedly easier when the judgment is made after the fact, when there is access to intelligence and testimony of witnesses.

This paper presents a factual section which then concentrates on the legal framework for armed conflicts in general and examines the types of armed conflicts and international humanitarian law applicable to them. The legal ramifications are followed by an analysis of the events in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine in order to apply the law to the facts. The author attempts to establish whether the situation in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine is an international or non-international armed conflict and what law is applicable.

  • Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, signed 18 October 1907, International Peace Conference, The Hague, Official Record (entered into force 26 January 1910), .

  • Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field signed 12 August 1949, Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Vol. I, Federal Political Department, Bern (entered into force 21 October 1950), .

  • Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, signed 12 August 1949, Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Vol. I, Federal Political Department, Bern (entered into force 21 October 1950), .

  • Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, signed 12 August 1949, Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Vol. I, Federal Political Department, Bern (entered into force 21 October 1950), .

  • Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, signed 12 August 1949, Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Vol. I, Federal Political Department, Bern (entered 21 October 1950), .

  • Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts signed 8 June 1977, Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armed Conflicts, Bern, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, 1978 (entered into force 7 December 1978).

  • Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflict signed 8 June 1977, Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armed Conflicts, Bern, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, 1978 (entered into force 7 December 1978).

  • Application of the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), I.C.J. Reports 2007.

  • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, I.C.J. Reports, 2004.

  • Prosecutor v D. Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-94-1, 2 October 1995).

  • Prosecutor v T. Lubanga Dyilo (Judgment) (International Criminal Court, Trial Chamber I, Case No ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012).

  • Prosecutor v I. Hassan Sesay, M. Kallon and A. Gbao (Judgment) (Special Court for Sierra Leone, Trial Chamber I, Case No SCSL-04-15-T-1234, 2 March 2009).

  • Prosecutor v L. Boskoski, J. Tarculovski (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber II, Case No IT-04-82-T, 10 July 2008).

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Judgment), I.C.J. Reports 1986.

  • Prosecutor v D. Tadić (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-94-1-A, 15 July 1999).

  • Aldrich, George H., ‘Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, (1996) 1 American Journal of International Law 6469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alvarez, Jose E., ‘Nuremberg Revisited: The Tadic Case’ (1996) 7 European Journal of International Law 24564.

  • Balzer, Harley, ‘The Ukraine Invasion and Public Opinion’ (2015) 16 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 7993.

  • Bebler, Anton, ‘Crimea and the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict’ (2015) 1 (15) Romanian Journal of European Affairs 3554.

  • Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility. Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cullen, Anthony, The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2010).

  • Emanuelli, Claude, International Humanitarian Law (Éditions Yvon Blais 2009).

  • Felde, Kitty and others, ‘The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic’ (1997–1998) 13 American University International Law Review 144168.

  • Ferraro, Tristan, ‘Determining the beginning and end of an occupation under international humanitarian law’ (2012) 885 (94) International Review of the Red Cross 13363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gillich, Ines, ‘Illegally Evading Attribution? Russia’s Use of Unmarked Troops in Crimea and International Humanitarian Law’ (2015) 48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1191223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Humanitarian Law and the Tadic Case’ (1996) 7 European Journal of International Law 26583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Concept of War In Modern International Law’ (1987) 2 (36) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 283306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Law of War (International Humanitarian Law)’ in Evans Malcolm D. (ed), International Law (Oxford University Press 2003) 789821.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hajduk, Jurij and Stępniewski, Tomasz, ‘Russia’s Hybrid War with Ukraine: Determinants, Instruments, Accomplishments and Challenges’ (2016) 2 Studia Europejskie 3752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haye (la), Eve, War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts (Cambridge University Press 2008).

  • Heinsch R , ‘Conflict Classification In Ukraine: The Return of the “Proxy War”?’ (2015) 91 International Law Studies 32360.

  • Hughes, Geraint, ‘Ukraine: Europe’s New Proxy War?’ (2014) 1 Fletcher Security Review 10518.

  • King, Faiza Patel and La Rosa, Anne-Marie, ‘International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Current Survey. The Jurisprudence of the Yugoslavia Tribunal’ (1994–1996) (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 12379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klip, André, Sluiter, Göran (eds), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals. Volume II. The International Criminal Tribunal Rwanda 1994–1999 (Intersentia 2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Korhonen, Outi, ‘Deconstructing the Conflict in Ukraine: The Relevance of International Law to Hybrid States and Wars’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 45278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meron, Theodor, ‘Classification of Armed Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia: Nicaragua’s Fallout’ (1998) 2 American Journal of International Law 23642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meron, Theodor, War Crimes Law Comes of Age. Essays (Oxford University Press 1998).

  • Nier III, Charles Lewis, ‘The Yugoslavian Civil War: An Analysis of the Applicability of the Laws of War Governing Non-International Armed Conflicts in the Modern World’, (1991–1992) 10 Dickinson Journal of International Law 30331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pejić, Jelena, ‘Status of Armed Conflicts’ in Wilmshurst, Elisabeth, Breau, Susan (eds), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007) 77100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reeves, Shane R. and Wallace David, ‘The Combatant Status of the ‘Little Green Men’ and Other Participants in the Ukraine Conflict’ (2015) 91 International Law Studies 361401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scharf Michael , Epps Valerie, ‘The International Trial of the Century? A “Cross-Fire” Exchange on the First Case Before the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal’ (1996) 29 Cornell International Law Journal 63563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, James G., ‘Towards a single definition of armed conflict in international humanitarian law: A critique of internationalized armed conflict’ (2003) 850 International Review of the Red Cross 313– 50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tyner, Davis B., ‘Internationalization of War Crimes Prosecutions: Correcting the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’s Folly in Tadic’ (2006) 18 Florida Journal of International Law 84386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Von Sternberg and Mark R. , ‘Yugoslavian War Crimes and the Search for a New Humanitarian Order: The Case of Dusko Tadic’ (1997) 12 Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development 35184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    BBC News , ‘Crimea referendum: Voters back Russia union’ (2014) accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 2.

    Vidmar, Jure, ‘Crimea’s Referendum and Secession: Why it Resembles Northern Cyprus More than Kosovo’ (2014) accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Kirsch, Nico, ‘Crimea and the Limits of International Law’ accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 4.

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (March 27, 2014) accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 5.

    Bender, Jeremy, ‘Former NATO commander: A new Russian offensive in eastern Ukraine is ‘imminent’’ (2015) Business Insider accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Blank, Laurie R., ‘Ukraine’s Crisis Part 2: LOAC’s Threshold for International Armed Conflict’ (2014) Harvard Law School, National Security Journal, accessed 13 June 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    ‘No Russian Military Forces in Ukraine, Russian Envoy Tells OSCE’ (2014) Sputnik News accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 8.

    Melzer, Nils, ‘Interpretative Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law’ (2009) accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    ICRC Commentary to Geneva Convention III, accessed 13 June 1017.

  • 10.

    ‘Ukrainian elder statesman: How Russian hybrid war is changing the world order’ (2017) accessed 16 June 2017.

  • 11.

    Reeves Shane , Barnsby, Rob, ‘The New Griffin of International Law: Hybrid Armed Conflicts’ (2013) Harvard IR accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Jorritsma, Remy, ‘Ukraine Insta-Symposium: Certain (Para)Military Activities in the Crimea: Legal Consequences for the Application of International Humanitarian Law’ (2014) accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    List of States-parties to Additional Protocol II: accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 14.

    ‘Hybrid war – does it even exist?’ (2015) accessed 16 June 2017.

  • 15.

    Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2013), accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 16.

    Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2017) accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 17.

    Shevchenko, Vitaly, ‘‘Little green men’ or ‘Russian invaders’?’ (2014) BBC News accessed 16 June 2017.

  • 18.

    Vité, Sylvain, Co-existing international and non-international armed conflicts in one country (2015) accessed 16 June 2017.

  • 19.

    Articles on State Responsibility, UN International Law Commission (2001) accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 20.

    ‘Ukraine: ICRC calls on all sides to respect international humanitarian law, 23-07-2014 News Release 14/125’ (2014) ICRC accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    ‘Eastern Ukraine: Questions and Answers about the Laws of War’ (2014) Human Rights Watch accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 22.

    ‘Ukraine: Mounting evidence of war crimes and Russian involvement’ (2014) Amnesty International accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 23.

    ‘Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine, 1 December 2014 to 15 February 2015’ (2015) ReliefWeb accessed 13 June 2017.

  • 24.

    Nuzov, Ilya, Quintin, Anne, ‘The Case of Russia’s Detention of Ukrainian Military Pilot Savchenko under IHL’ (2015) EJIL Talk! accessed 13 June 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    International armed conflict in Ukraine (2017) accessed 16 June 2017.

  • 26.

    Quenivet, Noelle, ‘Trying to Classify the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine….’ (2014) IntLawGrrls accessed 13 June 2017.