View More View Less
  • * Iryna Izarova: Professor, Faculty of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, irina
  • ** Bartosz Szolc-Nartowski: Assistant professor, Roman Law Department, University of Gdańsk
  • *** Anastasiia Kovtun: Legal consultant, Crowe UAE
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $576.00

Abstract

This article describes the meaning of amicus curiae according to modern legislation and doctrine, as well as its origin from Roman law and English law. One part of the article is devoted to the current legal position of international institutions regarding amicus curiae and its place in different legal systems worldwide. Furthermore, the last part of the article related to the analysis of the new amicus curiae concept in Ukraine legislation, combined with the new principles of judicial case management and cooperation of the judge and parties in civil procedure. The article concludes with some thoughts about the need and viability of its implementation in the civil law countries using examples of current reforms of Civil Procedure in Ukraine, and other states of Eastern Europe.

  • Anderson, Helen A., ‘Frenemies of the Court: The Many Faces of Amicus Curiae’ (2015) 49 University of Richmond Law Review 361416.

  • Bartholomeusz, L., ‘The Amicus Curiae Before International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) 5 Non- State Actors & Int'l L. 209, 211286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernatt, Maciej, ‘Opinia przyjaciela sądu (amicus curiae) jako pomocnicza instytucja prawna w orzecznictwie sądów polskich' in Ł. Bojarski (ed.), Sprawny sąd. Zbiór dobrych praktyk (CH Beck 2008) 184190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boyer, Laurent and Roland, Henri, Adages du droit français (4th ed. LexisNexis 1999).

  • Collins, Paul M. Jr., ‘Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court’ (2004) 4 Litigation Law and Society Review 807832.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coslin, Christelle, Lapillonne, Delphine, ‘France and the Concept of Amicus Curiae: What Lies Ahead?’ (2011) 4 Paris International Litigation Bulletin 1415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cumming, George and Freudenthal Mirjam, Civil Procedure in EU Competition Cases Before the English And Dutch Courts (Kluwer Law International, 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franze, Anthony J. and Anderson, Reeves R., ‘In Unusual Term, Big Year for Amicus Curiae at the Supreme Court (2016) National Law Journal (September 21, 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gao, Henry S., ‘Amicus Curiae in WTO Dispute Settlement: Theory and Practice’ (2006) 1 Big Country, Small World 51 China Rights Forum 5157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Appellate Body Report, United States WT/DS58/AB/R, adopted 6 November 1998, DSR 1998:VII, 2755.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Izarova, Iryna and Silvestri, Elisabetta, ‘Case Management Principle in Civil Justice: A Comparative Study of the Legislation of Italy and Ukraine’ (2018) 1(106) Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 1923.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joint American Law Institute / UNIDROIT Working Group on Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure. Appendix: rules of transnational civil procedure (A Reporter’s Study), (2005). Last update 27 September 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jolowicz , John Anthony, On Civil Procedure(CUP 2000).

  • Kochevar, Steven, ‘The Amici Curiae in Civil Law Jurisdictions’ (2013) 122/6 The Yale Law Journal 16531669.

  • Krislov, Samuel, ‘The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy’ (1963) 72/4 The Yale Law Journal 694721.

  • Langbein, John H., ‘The German Advantage in Civil Procedure (1985) 4 University of Chicago Law Review 823866.

  • Levine, Eugenia, ‘Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third-Party Participation’ (2011) 29 Berkeley J. Int'lLaw 200224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lucas, Alison, ‘Friends of the Court? The Ethics of Amicus Brief Writing in First Amendment Litigation’ (1999) 26 Fordham Urb. L.J 16051634.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mavroidis , Petros Constantinos, ‘Amicus Curiae Briefs Before The WTO: Much Ado About Nothing’ (2001) 2 Jean Monnet Working Paper 118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mubangizi, John S. and Mbazira, Cristopher, ‘Constructing the Amicus Curiae procedure in human rights litigation: What can Uganda learn from South Africa?’ (2012) 16 Law, Democracy and Development 199218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murray, Christina, ‘Litigating in the Public Interest: Intervention and the Amicus Curiae’ (1994) South African Journal on Human Rights.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paris Court of Appeal, 21 June and 6 July 1988, Gaz. Pal. 1988, 2, 700, Note Laurin.

  • Re, Loretta, ‘The Amicus Curiae Brief: Access to the Courts for Public Interest Associations’ (1984) 14 Melbourne University Review, and Australian Quarterly 522533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sorabji, John, English Civil Justice after the Woolf and Jackson Reforms: A Critical Analysis (CUP 2014).

  • Supreme Court of United Kingdom: The Supreme Court Rules (2009).

  • Tulibacka, Magdalena, Blomeyer, Roland, Sanz, Margarita, Common minimum standards of civil procedure (European Parliament EPRS PE 581.385, 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uzelac, Alan, ‘Towards European Rules of Civil Procedure: Rethinking Procedural Obligations’ (2017) 58/1 Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 318.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woolf , Harry Kenneth, Access to Justice, Final Report (H.M. Stationery Office 1996).

  • Woolf , Harry Kenneth, Access to Justice, Interim Report (Lord Chancellor’s Department, June 1995).