Authors:
SL Buckner Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by SL Buckner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
SJ Dankel Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by SJ Dankel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
KT Mattocks Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by KT Mattocks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
MB Jessee Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by MB Jessee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
JG Mouser Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by JG Mouser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
JP Loenneke Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Search for other papers by JP Loenneke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Background

A training program consisting of only one-repetition maximum (1RM) training results in similar strength adaptations as traditional resistance exercise. However, little is known regarding the affective or behavioral responses to this type of training.

Aim

To examine the affective and behavioral response to either a traditional resistance exercise program or a biweekly 1RM-training program.

Methods

Participants were trained for 8 weeks (2× per week). The HYPER group completed four sets of 8–12 repetitions; the 1RM group (TEST) worked up to a single maximal repetition.

Results

The TEST group felt more revitalized and had an increase in positive engagement during their first visit, whereas the HYPER group showed an increase in feelings of physical exhaustion during their first and last visits. There were no pre to post differences for the change in behavior or self-efficacy between groups.

Conclusion

1RM training appears to elicit a more favorable affective response, compared with HYPER training, which may ultimately improve adherence to resistance-type exercise.

  • 1.

    Annesi JJ : Self-motivation moderates effect of exercise-induced feelings on adherence. Percept. Mot. Skills 94, 467475 (2002)

  • 2.

    Arent SM , Landers DM , Matt KS , Etnier JL : Dose-response and mechanistic issues in the resistance training and affect relationship. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 27, 92110 (2005)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Buckner SL , Dankel SJ , Mattocks KT , Jessee MB , Mouser JG , Counts BR , Loenneke JP : The problem of muscle hypertrophy: revisited. Muscle Nerve 54, 10121014 (2016)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Buckner SL , Loenneke JP , Loprinzi PD : Single and combined associations of accelerometer-assessed physical activity and muscle-strengthening activities on plasma homocysteine in a national sample. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 37, 669674 (2017)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dankel SJ , Counts BR , Barnett BE , Buckner SL , Abe T , Loenneke JP : Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training. Muscle Nerve 56, 307314 (2017)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Dankel SJ , Loenneke JP , Loprinzi PD : Determining the importance of meeting muscle-strengthening activity guidelines: is the behavior or the outcome of the behavior (strength) a more important determinant of all-cause mortality? Mayo Clin. Proc. 91, 166174 (2016)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Dankel SJ , Loenneke JP , Loprinzi PD : Dose-dependent association between muscle-strengthening activities and all-cause mortality: prospective cohort study among a national sample of adults in the USA. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 109, 626633 (2016)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Ekkekakis P , Hall EE , Petruzzello SJ : Variation and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity of varying intensities: an alternative perspective on dose-response based on evolutionary considerations. J. Sports Sci. 23, 477500 (2005)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Fisher JP , Steele J : Heavier and lighter load resistance training to momentary failure produce similar increases in strength with differing degrees of discomfort. Muscle Nerve 56, 797803 (2017)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Francois ME , Baldi JC , Manning PJ , Lucas SJ , Hawley JA , Williams MJ , Cotter JD : ‘Exercise snacks’ before meals: a novel strategy to improve glycaemic control in individuals with insulin resistance. Diabetologia 57, 14371445 (2014)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Garber CE , Blissmer B , Deschenes MR , Franklin BA , Lamonte MJ , Lee IM , Nieman DC , Swain DP , American College of Sports Medicine: American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43, 13341359 (2011)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Mattocks KT , Buckner SL , Jessee MB , Dankel SJ , Mouser JG , Loenneke JP : Practicing the test produces strength equivalent to higher volume training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 19451954 (2017)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    O’Connor PJ , Bryant CX , Veltri JP , Gebhardt SM : State anxiety and ambulatory blood pressure following resistance exercise in females. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 25, 516521 (1993)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Parfitt G , Hughes S : The exercise intensity-affect relationship: evidence and implications for exercise behavior. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 7, S34S41 (2009)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Richardson DL , Duncan MJ , Jimenez A , Jones VM , Juris PM , Clarke ND : The perceptual responses to high-velocity, low-load and low-velocity, high-load resistance exercise in older adults. J. Sports Sci. 36, 15941601 (2018)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Rose EA , Parfitt G : A quantitative analysis and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 29, 281309 (2007)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Services USDoHaH ed (2008): Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

  • 18.

    Trost SG , Owen N , Bauman AE , Sallis JF , Brown W : Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 34, 19962001 (2002)

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editor-in-Chief

László ROSIVALL (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Managing Editor

Anna BERHIDI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Co-Editors

  • Gábor SZÉNÁSI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Ákos KOLLER (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zsolt RADÁK (University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary)
  • László LÉNÁRD (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán UNGVÁRI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Assistant Editors

  • Gabriella DÖRNYEI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zsuzsanna MIKLÓS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • György NÁDASY (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Hungarian Editorial Board

  • György BENEDEK (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán BENYÓ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Mihály BOROS (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • László CSERNOCH (University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • Magdolna DANK (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • László DÉTÁRI (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zoltán GIRICZ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary and Pharmahungary Group, Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán HANTOS (Semmelweis University, Budapest and University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán HEROLD (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary) 
  • László HUNYADI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gábor JANCSÓ (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán KARÁDI (University of Pecs, Hungary)
  • Miklós PALKOVITS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gyula PAPP (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Gábor PAVLIK (University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary)
  • András SPÄT (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gyula SZABÓ (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán SZELÉNYI (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Lajos SZOLLÁR (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • József TOLDI (MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group and University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Árpád TÓSAKI (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

International Editorial Board

  • Dragan DJURIC (University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Christopher H.  FRY (University of Bristol, UK)
  • Stephen E. GREENWALD (Blizard Institute, Barts and Queen Mary University of London, UK)
  • Tibor HORTOBÁGYI (University of Groningen, Netherlands)
  • George KUNOS (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA)
  • Massoud MAHMOUDIAN (Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
  • Tadaaki MANO (Gifu University of Medical Science, Japan)
  • Luis Gabriel NAVAR (Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA)
  • Hitoo NISHINO (Nagoya City University, Japan)
  • Ole H. PETERSEN (Cardiff University, UK)
  • Ulrich POHL (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Planegg, Germany)
  • Andrej A. ROMANOVSKY (University of Arizona, USA)
  • Anwar Ali SIDDIQUI (Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan)
  • Csaba SZABÓ (University of Fribourg, Switzerland)
  • Eric VICAUT (Université de Paris, UMRS 942 INSERM, France)

 

Editorial Correspondence:
Physiology International
Semmelweis University
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine
Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: +36-1-2100-100
E-mail: pi@semmelweis.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
  • Global Health
  • Index Copernicus
  • Index Medicus
  • Medline
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • SCOPUS
  • WoS - Science Citation Index Expanded

 

2023  
Web of Science  
Journal Impact Factor 2.2
Rank by Impact Factor Q3 (Physiology)
Journal Citation Indicator 0.58
Scopus  
CiteScore 3.4
CiteScore rank Q2 (Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation)
SNIP 0.508
Scimago  
SJR index 0.407
SJR Q rank Q2

Physiology International
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 1100 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 752 EUR / 828 USD
Print + online subscription: 880 EUR / 968 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Physiology International
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2006 (1950)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2498-602X (Print)
ISSN 2677-0164 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2024 68 0 0
May 2024 40 0 0
Jun 2024 62 0 0
Jul 2024 67 0 0
Aug 2024 42 2 2
Sep 2024 34 0 0
Oct 2024 32 0 0