Authors:
Nawanto Agung Prastowo Department of Physiology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Nawanto Agung Prastowo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-7912
,
Maria Karen Tjhin Department of Physiology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Maria Karen Tjhin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mariani Santosa Department of Physiology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Mariani Santosa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Julia Rahadian Tanjung Department of Physiology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Julia Rahadian Tanjung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ignatio Rika Haryono Department of Physiology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Ignatio Rika Haryono in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Purpose

Scoliosis may create muscle imbalance and disturb muscle metabolism. However, no studies have examined muscle cell metabolism in scoliosis. This study evaluates lactate concentration in female college students with scoliosis.

Methods

One hundred fifty female college students followed this cross-sectional analytic study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Scoliosis was measured using a scoliometer. A scoliometer reading of 5° was considered scoliosis. Lactate concentration was measured using a lactate analyzer, and a lactate value above 2 mg dL−1 was denoted as ‘elevated.’ Anova and post hoc tests were used to analyze differences in the variables between scoliosis and normal subgroups. The results were significant if P < 0.05.

Results

One hundred participants (66.7%) had a spinal curve angle of more than 5°. Only weight in thoracic scoliosis was lower than normal (P = 0.022). Lactate was significantly higher than normal in all scoliosis subtypes (P < 0.001). Lactate in both types was considerably higher than thoracic and lumbar scoliosis (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively).

Conclusion

Lactate concentration increased in female students with scoliosis.

  • 1.

    Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2018; 13: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013; 7(1): 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Reamy BV, Slakey JB. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64(1): 1116.

  • 4.

    Tan KJ, Moe MM, Vaithinathan R, Wong HK. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34(7): 697700. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Ilharreborde B, Simon AL, Shadi M, Kotwicki T. Is scoliosis a source of pain? J Child Orthop 2023; 17(6): 52734. https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521231215861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH. The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(3): 3648. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199703000-00007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Trief PM, Elliott DJ, Stein N, Frederickson BE. Functional vs. organic pain: a meaningful distinction? J Clin Psychol 1987; 43(2): 21926. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198703)43:2<219::aid-jclp2270430209>3.0.co;2-s.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cirrincione PM, Thakur A, Zucker CP, Wisch JL, Groisser BN, Nguyen J, et al. Exploring correlations between pain and deformity in idiopathic scoliosis with validated self-reported pain scores, radiographic measurements, and trunk surface topographic measurements. J Pediatr Orthop 2023; 43(10): 60814. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    An JK, Berman D, Schulz J. Back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comprehensive review. J Child Orthop 2023; 17(2): 12640. https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521221149058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Makino T, Kaito T, Sakai Y, Takenaka S, Yoshikawa H. Health-related quality of life and postural changes of spinal alignment in female adolescents associated with back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cross-sectional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44(14): E833E40. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Matamalas A, Figueras C, Pizones J, Moreno-Manzanaro L, Betegón J, Esteban M, et al. How back pain intensity relates to clinical and psychosocial factors in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2022; 31(4): 100612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07117-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Wong C. Mechanism of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at risk for progression; a unifying pathway of development by normal growth and imbalance. Scoliosis 2015; 10: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-015-0030-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Park Y, Ko JY, Jang JY, Lee S, Beom J, Ryu JS. Asymmetrical activation and asymmetrical weakness as two different mechanisms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 17582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96882-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ng PTT, Claus A, Izatt MT, Pivonka P, Tucker K. Is spinal neuromuscular function asymmetrical in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis compared to those without scoliosis?: a narrative review of surface EMG studies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2022; 63: 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Wong C, Shayestehpour H, Koutras C, Dahl B, Otaduy MA, Rasmussen J, et al. Using electric stimulation of the spinal muscles and electromyography during motor tasks for evaluation of the role in development and progression of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Clin Med 2024; 13(6): 1758. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Ohkuwa T, Tsukamoto K, Yamai K, Itoh H, Yamazaki Y, Tsuda T. The relationship between exercise intensity and lactate concentration on the skin surface. Int J Biomed Sci 2009; 5(1): 237. https://doi.org/10.59566/ijbs.2009.5023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hargreaves M, Spriet LL. Skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise. Nat Metab 2020; 2(9): 81728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-0251-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Szurmik T, Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz K, Kurzeja P, Gasienica-Walczak B, Prusak J, Bibrowicz K. Assessment of the functional state of the back muscles in girls with C-shaped low-grade scoliosis in a tensiomyographic image: an observational cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18(10): e0292555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Gerdle B, Larsson B, Forsberg F, Ghafouri N, Karlsson L, Stensson N, et al. Chronic widespread pain: increased glutamate and lactate concentrations in the trapezius muscle and plasma. Clin J Pain 2014; 30(5): 40920. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829e9d2a.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Keshari KR, Lotz JC, Link TM, Hu S, Majumdar S, Kurhanewicz J. Lactic acid and proteoglycans as metabolic markers for discogenic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33(3): 3127. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816201c3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Ma HH, Tai CL, Chen LH, Niu CC, Chen WJ, Lai PL. Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle. Biomed Eng Online 2017; 16(1): 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0427-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editor-in-Chief

László ROSIVALL (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Managing Editor

Anna BERHIDI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Co-Editors

  • Gábor SZÉNÁSI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Ákos KOLLER (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zsolt RADÁK (University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary)
  • László LÉNÁRD (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán UNGVÁRI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Assistant Editors

  • Gabriella DÖRNYEI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zsuzsanna MIKLÓS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • György NÁDASY (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)

Hungarian Editorial Board

  • György BENEDEK (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán BENYÓ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Mihály BOROS (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • László CSERNOCH (University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • Magdolna DANK (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • László DÉTÁRI (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Zoltán GIRICZ (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary and Pharmahungary Group, Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán HANTOS (Semmelweis University, Budapest and University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán HEROLD (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary) 
  • László HUNYADI (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gábor JANCSÓ (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán KARÁDI (University of Pecs, Hungary)
  • Miklós PALKOVITS (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gyula PAPP (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Gábor PAVLIK (University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary)
  • András SPÄT (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Gyula SZABÓ (University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Zoltán SZELÉNYI (University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Lajos SZOLLÁR (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • József TOLDI (MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group and University of Szeged, Hungary)
  • Árpád TÓSAKI (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

International Editorial Board

  • Dragan DJURIC (University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Christopher H.  FRY (University of Bristol, UK)
  • Stephen E. GREENWALD (Blizard Institute, Barts and Queen Mary University of London, UK)
  • Tibor HORTOBÁGYI (University of Groningen, Netherlands)
  • George KUNOS (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA)
  • Massoud MAHMOUDIAN (Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
  • Tadaaki MANO (Gifu University of Medical Science, Japan)
  • Luis Gabriel NAVAR (Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA)
  • Hitoo NISHINO (Nagoya City University, Japan)
  • Ole H. PETERSEN (Cardiff University, UK)
  • Ulrich POHL (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Planegg, Germany)
  • Andrej A. ROMANOVSKY (University of Arizona, USA)
  • Anwar Ali SIDDIQUI (Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan)
  • Csaba SZABÓ (University of Fribourg, Switzerland)
  • Eric VICAUT (Université de Paris, UMRS 942 INSERM, France)

 

Editorial Correspondence:
Physiology International
Semmelweis University
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine
Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: +36-1-2100-100
E-mail: pi@semmelweis.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
  • Global Health
  • Index Copernicus
  • Index Medicus
  • Medline
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • SCOPUS
  • WoS - Science Citation Index Expanded

 

2024  
Scopus  
CiteScore  
CiteScore rank  
SNIP  
Scimago  
SJR index 0.356
SJR Q rank Q2

2023  
Web of Science  
Journal Impact Factor 2.2
Rank by Impact Factor Q3 (Physiology)
Journal Citation Indicator 0.58
Scopus  
CiteScore 3.4
CiteScore rank Q2 (Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation)
SNIP 0.508
Scimago  
SJR index 0.407
SJR Q rank Q2

Physiology International
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge Effective from 1st Apr 2025:
600 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 752 EUR / 828 USD
Print + online subscription: 880 EUR / 968 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Physiology International
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2006 (1950)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2498-602X (Print)
ISSN 2677-0164 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Nov 2024 0 0 0
Dec 2024 0 0 0
Jan 2025 0 0 0
Feb 2025 0 0 0
Mar 2025 1143 12 12
Apr 2025 230 3 5
May 2025 0 0 0