View More View Less
  • 1 Leiden University
  • 2 Hungarian Academy of Sciences and University of Szeged
Restricted access

In this paper we will argue that contrary to the received view passive potential affixation in Hungarian primarily derives complex syntactic objects rather than adjectives. By means of a number of tests we show the differences between the two classes of items bearing the homophonous affix -ható/hető : one a nonfinite verb form, the other a lexicalized adjective. In addition to a syntactic analysis of this composite affix, a typology is provided for languages that have similar constructions.

  • Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Yota Samioti. 2014. Domains within words and their meanings: a case study. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer and F. Schäfer (eds.) The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 81111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bánréti, Zoltán. 2007. A mellérendelés és az ellipszis nyelvtana a magyarban [The grammar of subordination and ellipsis in Hungarian]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartos, Huba. 2000. Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere [Syntactic background of inflectional phenomena]. In Kiefer (2000, 653–762).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartos, Huba. 2009. The syntax of Hungarian -va adverbial pariticiples: A single affix with variable merge-in locations. In É. Kiss (2009, 75–102).

  • Bartos, Huba. 2011. Hungarian external causatives: Monoclausal but bi-eventive. In T. Laczkó and C. O. Ringen (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 12: Papers from the 2009 Debrecen conference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Booij, Geert. 1985. Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.) Advances in nonlinear phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. 143160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chapin, Paul. 1967. On the syntax of word-formation in English. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Chavula, Jean Josephine. 2016. Verbal derivation and valency in Citumbuka. Utrecht: LOT.

  • Dékány, Éva. 2014. A nem véges alárendelés (az igenevek) története [The history of nonfinite clauses]. In K. É. Kiss (ed.) Magyar generatív törteneti mondattan [Hungarian generative historical grammar]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 177238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dubinsky, Stanley and Silvester R. Simango. 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa. Language 72. 749781.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 2005. Az ómagyar igeidorendszer morfoszintaxisáról [On the morphosyntax of the Old Hungarian tense system]. Magyar Nyelv 101. 420435.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin (ed.). 2009. Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces (Interface explorations 20). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabb, Nigel. 1984. Syntactic affixation. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Farkas, Judit. 2013. Az ige analógiájára muködo -ható és -andó konstrukciók [-ható and/or -andó constructions in analogy to verbs]. In E. Kádár and S. Szilágyi N. (eds.) Analógia és modern nyelvleírás. A magyar nyelvészeti kutatások újabb eredményei III [Analogy and modern grammatical description: New results of Hungarian linguistic research III]. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület. 5162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 111176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • H. Tóth, Tibor. 2000. Észrevehetok/észrevehetoek vagy nem vehetok észre? Magyar Nyelv 96. 8289.

  • Holmberg, Anders. 2001. The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55. 141175.

  • Ishizuka, Tomoko and Hilda Koopman. 2014. On the importance of being silent or pronounced: English -able and Japanese -rare potentials compared. Poster presented at GLOW 2014, HUB Brussel, 2–4 April 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kálmán, László, Péter Rebrus and Miklós Törkenczy. 2012. Possible and impossible variation in Hungarian. In F. Kiefer, P. Siptár and M. Ladányi (eds.) Current issues in morphological theory: (Ir)Regularity, analogy and frequency. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2349.

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1981. Unambiguous paths. In R. May and J. Koster (eds.) Levels of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: Foris. 143183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenesei, István. 1989. Logikus-e a magyar szórend? [Is Hungarian word order logical?]. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 17. 105152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenesei, István. 1996. Képzo vagy nem képzo? [Derivation or inflection?]. In I. Terts (ed.) Nyelv, nyelvész, társadalom: Emlékkönyv Szépe György 65. születésnapjára barátaitól, kollégáitól, tanítványaitól, II. kötet [Language, linguists, society: Festschrift on the occasion of the 65th birthday of György Szépe from his friends, colleagues and students, volume 2]. Pécs: JPTE. 9295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenesei, István. 2007. Semiwords and affixoids: The territory between word and affix. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54. 263293.

  • Kenesei, István. 2008. Az ellipszis szabályai a szóösszetételekben [Rules for ellipsis in compounds]. In K. Bibok (ed.) A morfológiától a pragmatikáig: Tanulmányok Pete István 80. születésnapjára [From morphology to pragmatics: Festschrift for István Pete’s 80th birthday]. Szeged: JATEPress. 6377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenesei, István. 2014. On a multifunctional derivational affix: Its use in relational adjectives or nominal modification, and phrasal affixation in Hungarian. Word Structure 7. 214239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiefer, Ferenc. 1981. What is possible in Hungarian? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 31. 147185.

  • Kiefer, Ferenc. 1998. Alaktan [Morphology]. In K. É. Kiss, F. Kiefer and P. Siptár Új magyar nyelvtan [A new Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. 187290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.). 2000. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian 3. Morphology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Komlósy, András. 1992. Régensek és vonzatok [Heads and complements]. In F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan [A structural grammar of Hungarian 1. Syntax]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 299527.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Komlósy, András. 1994. Complements and adjuncts. In F. Kiefer and K. É. Kiss (eds.) The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and semantics 27). San Diego/New York: Academic Press. 91178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laczkó, Tibor. 2000. A melléknévi és határozói igenévképzok [Participle forming suffixes]. In Kiefer (2000, 409–452).

  • Laczkó, Tibor. 2001. A comprehensive analysis of -ó/-o, a multifunctional deverbal nominalizer in Hungarian. In I. Kenesei (ed.) Argument structure in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 1349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laczkó, Tibor. 2008. On binding, empty categories, and morphosyntactic processes in “passive” participial constructions. In Ch. Piñón and Sz. Szentgyörgyi (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 10: Papers from the Veszprém conference. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 103126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leeman, Danielle. 1992. Deux classes d’adjectifs en -ble. Langue Française 96. 4563.

  • Lipták, Anikó. 2012. Verb-stranding ellipsis and verbal identity: The role of polarity focus. Linguistics in the Netherlands 29. 8296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipták, Anikó. 2013. The syntax of positive polarity in Hungarian: Evidence from ellipsis. Lingua 128. 7294.

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Oltra-Massuet, Isabel. 2014. Deverbal adjectives at the interface: A crosslinguistic investigation into the morphology. Syntax and semantics of -ble. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrova, N. Je. 2008. Otglagol’nye prilagatel’nye na -m- i stradatel’nye prichastija nastojashchego vremeni: Problemy differenciacii i vzaimodejstvija. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii 2008/2. 89109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seidl, Amanda and Alexis Dimitriadis. 2003. Statives and reciprocal morphology in Swahili. In P. Sauzet and A. ZribiHertz (eds.) Typologie des langues d’afrique et universaux de la grammaire. Paris: L’Harmattan. 239284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1982. The syntax of words (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Surányi, Balázs. 2009a. Locative particle and adverbial incorporation at the interfaces. In É. Kiss (2009, 39–74).

  • Surányi, Balázs. 2009b. Verbal particles inside and outside vP. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 56. 201249.

  • Toman, Jindrnich. 1987. Wortsyntax –Eine Diskussion ausgewählter Probleme deutscher Wortbildung. Tübingen: Neymeyer.

  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wood, Jim and Einar F. Sigurðsson. 2014. Building deverbal ability adjectives in Icelandic. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20. 351360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2020 0 10 4
Jun 2020 0 24 2
Jul 2020 6 2 0
Aug 2020 0 9 2
Sep 2020 0 7 1
Oct 2020 0 2 1
Nov 2020 0 0 0