View More View Less
  • 1 Masaryk University, Brno
Restricted access

Constituent negation (CN) is commonly thought to be a subtype of natural language negation which does not exhibit substantial differences from the more frequent verbal negation. In this paper, I argue that at least Czech CN is different. I argue that its semantics targets both at-issue meaning and focus alternatives. The evidence will come from differences in interpretations between English and Czech with respect to negated comparatives adjoined to NPs (like no more than two people) and from many other types of negated constituents. I argue that the cross-linguistic variation can be explained if Slavic CN is treated as a focus-oriented particle, unlike English no which targets scalar alternatives.

  • Büring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann. 2001. V3 or not V. An investigation of German focus particles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 229281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corver, Norbert and Joost Zwarts. 2006. Prepositional numerals. Lingua 116. 811835.

  • Fox, Danny and Martin Hackl. 2007. The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29. 537586.

  • Geurts, Bart. 1998. The mechanisms of denial. Language 74. 274307.

  • Hajičová, Eva. 1984. Presupposition and allegation revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 8. 155167.

  • Hajičová, Eva, Barbara H. Partee and Petr Sgall. 2013. Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Dodrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jasinskaja, Katja. 2016. Information structure in Slavic. In C. Féry and S. Ishihara (eds.) The Oxford handbook of information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 709732.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In K. Turner (ed.) The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view. Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface 1. Oxford: Elsevier. 257291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nouwen, Rick. 2008. Upper-bounded no more: The exhaustive interpretation of non-strict comparison. Natural Language Semantics 16. 271295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reis, Marga. 2005. On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German: A reply to Büring and Hartmann (2001). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. 459483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75116.

  • Schulz, Katrin and Robert van Rooij. 2006. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29. 205250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2020 0 4 3
Jun 2020 0 3 0
Jul 2020 2 0 0
Aug 2020 0 2 2
Sep 2020 0 5 2
Oct 2020 0 1 1
Nov 2020 0 0 0