Baker, Mark C. 2010. Formal generative typology. In B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 285–312.
Baker, Mark C. 2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark C. and James McCloskey. 2007. On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11. 273–284.
Bárány, András. 2015. Differential object marking in Hungarian and the morphosyntax of case and agreement. University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.
Bartos, Huba. 1997. The nature of object agreement in Hungarian. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 19–34.
Béjar, Susana & Milan Rezac. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 35–73.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a postsyntactic operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger and S. Bejar (eds.) Phi Theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 295–328.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Phil Branigan. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple case checking: Emerging issues. In A. Johns, D. Massam and J. Ndayiragije (eds.) Ergativity: Emerging issues. Dordrecht: Springer. 47–77.
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. University of Tromsø PhD dissertation.
Caha, Pavel. 2013. Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 1015–1066.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2013. A semantic solution to the problem of Hungarian object agreement. Natural Language Semantics 21. 345–371.
Deal, Amy Rose. 2010. Ergative case and the transitive subject: A view from Nez Perce. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28. 73–120.
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. When Hungarians Agree (to Disagree). Manuscript CUNY Graduate Center. New York.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2013. The inverse agreement constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 2. 2–21.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2015. The Person-Case constraint and the Inverse Agreement Constraint are manifestations of the same information-structural restriction. Talk at the 2015 GLOW Colloquium.
Georgi, Doreen. 2012. A local derivation of global case splits. In Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Müller (eds.) Local Modelling of Non-local Dependencies in Syntax [Linguistische Arbeiten 547]. Berlin: De Gruyter. 305–36.
Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526.
Keine, Stefan. 2010. Case and agreement from fringe to core: A minimalist approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Universals constrain change, change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 24–53.
Legate, Julie. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 55–101.
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In G. F. Westphal, B. Ao and H.-R. Chae (eds.) ESCOL ’91: Proceedings of the eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ohio State University. 234–253.
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62. 56–119.
Ormazabal, Javier and Juan Romero. 2013. Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 221–239.
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richards, Marc. 2004. Object shift, scrambling, and symmetrical syntax. University of Cambridge dissertation.
Richards, Marc. 2008. Defective agree, case alternations, and the prominence of person. In M. Richards and A. L. Malchukov (eds.) Scales (Linguistische Arbeits Berichte 86). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig. 137–161.
Scott, Graham. 1978. The Fore language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. 112–171.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In F. Kiefer and K. É. Kiss (eds.) The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics 27). New York: Academic Press. 179–274.
Trommer, Jochen. 2005. Hungarian has no portmanteau agreement. In P. Siptár and C. Piñón (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 9, Papers from the Düsseldorf conference. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 283–302.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1981. Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 43–81.