View More View Less
  • 1 University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $648.00

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Baker, Mark C. 2010. Formal generative typology. In B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 285312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baker, Mark C. 2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Baker, Mark C. and James McCloskey. 2007. On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11. 273284.

  • Bárány, András. 2015. Differential object marking in Hungarian and the morphosyntax of case and agreement. University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartos, Huba. 1997. The nature of object agreement in Hungarian. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 1934.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Béjar, Susana & Milan Rezac. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 3573.

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a postsyntactic operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger and S. Bejar (eds.) Phi Theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 295328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Phil Branigan. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple case checking: Emerging issues. In A. Johns, D. Massam and J. Ndayiragije (eds.) Ergativity: Emerging issues. Dordrecht: Springer. 4777.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. University of Tromsø PhD dissertation.

  • Caha, Pavel. 2013. Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 10151066.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 152.

  • Coppock, Elizabeth. 2013. A semantic solution to the problem of Hungarian object agreement. Natural Language Semantics 21. 345371.

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2010. Ergative case and the transitive subject: A view from Nez Perce. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28. 73120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. When Hungarians Agree (to Disagree). Manuscript CUNY Graduate Center. New York.

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 2013. The inverse agreement constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 2. 221.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 2015. The Person-Case constraint and the Inverse Agreement Constraint are manifestations of the same information-structural restriction. Talk at the 2015 GLOW Colloquium.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Georgi, Doreen. 2012. A local derivation of global case splits. In Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Müller (eds.) Local Modelling of Non-local Dependencies in Syntax [Linguistische Arbeiten 547]. Berlin: De Gruyter. 30536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482526.

  • Keine, Stefan. 2010. Case and agreement from fringe to core: A minimalist approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Universals constrain change, change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Legate, Julie. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 55101.

  • Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In G. F. Westphal, B. Ao and H.-R. Chae (eds.) ESCOL ’91: Proceedings of the eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ohio State University. 234253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62. 56119.

  • Ormazabal, Javier and Juan Romero. 2013. Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 221239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Richards, Marc. 2004. Object shift, scrambling, and symmetrical syntax. University of Cambridge dissertation.

  • Richards, Marc. 2008. Defective agree, case alternations, and the prominence of person. In M. Richards and A. L. Malchukov (eds.) Scales (Linguistische Arbeits Berichte 86). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig. 137161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, Graham. 1978. The Fore language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: The Australian National University.

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. 112171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In F. Kiefer and K. É. Kiss (eds.) The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics 27). New York: Academic Press. 179274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trommer, Jochen. 2005. Hungarian has no portmanteau agreement. In P. Siptár and C. Piñón (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 9, Papers from the Düsseldorf conference. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 283302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1981. Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 4381.