This paper presents an analysis of the Russian declension in Nanosyntax (Starke 2009, 2018). The analysis has two theoretically important aspects. First, it makes no reference to language-particular declension features. This allows one to maintain the idea that morphosyntactic features are drawn from a set provided by the UG, i.e., language invariant. The analysis also does not use contextual rules. In order to correctly pair the right ending with a particular root, the analysis only relies on specifying each marker for the features it spells out. The correct pairing of roots and affixes falls out from such a specification and the Nanosyntax model of spellout.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Gereon Müller . 2008. Class features as probes. In A. Bachrach and A. Nevins (eds.) Inflectional identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 101–155.
Baker, M. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baunaz, Lena and Eric Lander . 2018. Nanosyntax: the basics. In L. Baunaz , K. De Clercq , L. Haegeman and E. Lander (eds.) Exploring nanosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–56.
Bayer, Josef , Markus Bader and Michael Meng . 2001. Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: Syntactic and processing effects in German. Lingua 111. 465–514.
Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale . 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 1–68.
Blevins, James P. 2016. Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blix, Hagen . 2021. Phrasal spellout and partial overwrite: On an alternative to backtracking. Ms. NYU, New York. lingbuzz/005793.
Bobaljik, Jonathan . 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bobaljik, Jonathan and Uli Sauerland . 2018. *ABA and the combinatorics of morphological features. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 15.
Caha, Pavel . 2009. The Nanosyntax of case. Ph.D. thesis. CASTL, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Caha, Pavel . 2010. The German locative-directional alternation. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13(3). 179–223.
Caha, Pavel . 2013. Explaining the structure of case paradigms through the mechanisms of Nanosyntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 1015–1066.
Caha, Pavel . 2017. How (not) to derive a *ABA: The case of Blansitt's generalisation. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 84.
Caha, Pavel . 2021. Modeling declensions without declension features: The long version. Ms. Masaryk University, Brno. lingbuzz/005537.
Caha, Pavel . to appear. Nanosyntax: some key features. In A. Alexiadou , R. Kramer , A. Marantz and I. O. Massuet (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of distributed morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caha, Pavel , Karen De Clercq and Guido Vanden Wyngaerd . 2019. The fine structure of the comparative. Studia Linguistica 73(2). 470–521.
Chomsky, Noam . 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and beyond. No. 3 in The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 104–131.
Chvany, Catherine V. 1982. Hierarchies in the Russian case system: For N-A-G-P-D-I, against N-G-D-A-I-P. Russian Language Journal / Pyccкий язык 36(125). 133–147.
Cinque, Guglielmo . 2013. Cognition, universal grammar, and typological generalizations. Lingua 130. 50–65.
Corbett, Greville G. 1982. Gender in Russian: An account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics 6. 197–232.
De Clercq, Karen . 2013. A unified syntax of negation. Ph.D. thesis. Ghent University, Ghent.
De Clercq, Karen and Guido Vanden Wyngaerd . 2017. *ABA revisited: evidence from Czech and Latin degree morphology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 69.
Halle, Morris . 1997. Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening , Y. Kang and M. McGinnis (eds.) Papers at the interface. No. 30 in MITWPL. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 425–449.
Halle, Morris and Bert Vaux . 1998. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In J. Jasanoff , H. C. Melchert and L. Olivier (eds.) Mir Curad: Studies in honor of Clavert Watkins. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 223–240.
Harley, Heidi . 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276.
Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter . 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3). 482–526.
Haspelmath, Martin . 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 119–132.
Jurafsky, Daniel . 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–578.
Kiparsky, Paul . 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In P. Kiparsky and S. Anderson (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 93–106.
Kloudová, Veronika . 2020. The interaction of functional morphemes inside the nominal phrase. München: LINCOM GmbH.
Kramer, Ruth T. 2015. The morphosyntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marantz, Alec . 1996. Cat as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. Ms. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
McCreight, Katherine and Catherine V. Chvany 1991. Geometric representation of paradigms in a modular theory of grammar. In F. Plank (ed.) Paradigms: The economy of inflection. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 91–112.
McFadden, Thomas . 2018. *ABA in stem-allomorphy and the emptiness of the nominative. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 8.
Melvold, Janis Leanne . 1989. Structure and stress in the phonology of Russian. Ph.D. thesis. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Müller, Gereon . 2003. A Distributed Morphology approach to syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In O. Arnaudova , W. Brown , M. L. Rivero and D. Stojanovic (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 12: The Ottawa Meeting. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. 353–373.
Picallo, M. Carme . 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3(3). 279–316.
Privizentseva, Mariia . 2020. Declension tracks gender: Insights from mixed agreement in Russian. Handout of a Talk at NELS 51.
Smith, Peter W. , Beata Moskal , Ting Xu , Jungmin Kang and Jonathan David Bobaljik . 2019. Case and number suppletion in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(3). 1029–1101.
Starke, Michal . 2009. Nanosyntax. A short primer to a new approach to language. In P. Svenonius , G. Ramchand , M. Starke and T. Taraldsen (eds.) Nordlyd 36: Special issue on Nanosyntax. Tromsø: University of Tromsø. 1–6.
Starke, Michal . 2017. Resolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GEN. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 104.
Starke, Michal . 2018. Complex left branches, spellout, and prefixes. In L. Baunaz , K. De Clercq , L. Haegeman and E. Lander (eds.) Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 239–249.
Stockall, Linnaea and Alec Marantz 2006. A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon 1(1). 85–123.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald . 2019. An introduction to Nanosyntax. Linguistics Vanguard 5(1).
Timberlake, Alan . 2004. A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido . 2018. The feature structure of pronouns: a probe into multidimensional paradigms. In L. Baunaz , K. D. Clercq , L. Haegeman and E. Lander (eds.) Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 277–304.
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido , Michal Starke , Karen De Clercq and Pavel Caha 2020. How to be positive. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 23.
Wegener, Claudia . 2012. A grammar of Savosavo. Mouton Grammar Library 61. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Zompì, Stanislao . 2019. Ergative is not inherent: Evidence from *ABA in suppletion and syncretism. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 73.