This study explores the major types and main interpersonal functions of meishi (没事, literally ‘I'm fine’) by Chinese females in romantic conversation through analyzing collected posts from Sina Microblog. Results show that meishi by Chinese females in the context of romantic relationships primarily manifests the attributes of “expressive” and “assertive” (“insincere assertive” in particular), with specific functions to express comfort (expressive), to implicitly express negative feelings (expressive), and to avoid self-disclosure of negative emotion (insincere assertive). We hold that Chinese women's use of meishi is not only a realization of gendered discourse but also has a practical function as it detects the sincerity and attentiveness of their male counterparts.
Arundale, Robert. 2013. Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 12–26.
Austin, John. 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balahur, Alexandra and Andrés Montoyo. 2008. Applying a culture dependent emotion triggers database for text valence and emotion classification. Procesamiento Del Lenguaje Natural 40. 107–114.
Burleson, Brant. 1984. Age, social‐cognitive development, and the use of comforting strategies. Communications Monographs 51(2). 140–153.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York, NY: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. Performing gender identity. In J. Coates (ed.) Language and gender: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 270–284.
Chalupnik, Malgorzata, Christie, Christie and Louise, Mullany, 2017. (Im)politeness and gender. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Kádár (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 517–537.
Chen, Xinren. 2019. “You’re a nuisance!”: “Patch-up” jocular abuse in Chinese fiction. Journal of Pragmatics 139. 52–63.
Coates, Jennifer. 2015. Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.
Dindia, Kathryn and Mike Allen. 1992. Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 112(1). 106–124.
Edmondson, Willis, Juliane House and Dániel Kádára. 2023. Expressions, speech acts and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elm, Malin Sveningsson. 2009. How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research? In A. Markham and N. Baym (eds.) Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. 49–76.
Fish, Karyn, Kathrin Rothermich and Marc Pell. 2017. The sound of (in)sincerity. Journal of Pragmatics 121. 147–161.
Fukushima, Saeko. 2016. Emic understandings of attentiveness and its related concepts among Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(2). 181–208.
Hall, Kira and Mary Bucholtz. 1995. Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. Oxon: Routledge.
Houser, Marian, Christina Fleuriet and Dawn Estrada. 2012. The cyber factor: An analysis of relational maintenance through the use of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports 29(1). 34–43.
Hsu, Ian, Somnath Saha, Phillip Korthuis, Victoria Sharp, Jonathan Cohn, Richard Moore and Mary Beach, 2012. Providing support to patients in emotional encounters: A new perspective on missed empathic opportunities. Patient Education and Counseling 88. 436–442.
Jin, Yingzhe and Xinren Chen, 2020. “Mouren” (“Somebody”) can be you-know-who: A case study of mock referential vagueness in Chinese Weibo posts. Journal of Pragmatics 164. 1–15.
Kádár, Dániel, Juliane House, Fengguang Liu and Jiao Lin. 2023. Self-denigration in Chinese: An interactional speech act approach. Language & Communication 88. 153–167.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman's place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Lakoff, Robin. 2017. The hollow man Donald Trump, populism, and post-truth politics. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4). 595–606.
Lazar, Michelle and Ke Sun. 2020. Cultural dilemmas of motherhood and gendered public/private spheres: The case of a remediatized Chinese reality show. Discourse, Context & Media 38. 1–9.
Li, Yuanyuan. 2012. A contrastive study of Meishi-er and Bukeqi. Jiannan Literature: Classic Reading 5. 106–108. No. 1006-026X (2012) 05-0000-02.
Liu, Chunguang, Minzhi Cui and Chunlin Ma. 2014. The response functions and typological meanings of Meishi-er. Journal of Chizhou University 28(1). 103–107.
Luo, Qiongsi. 2016. The content and speech characteristics of girls’ network interactions. Journal of Chongqing University of Education 29(3). 54–58.
Lü, Mingchen. 2011. Spatio-temporal environment and types of verbal communication. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition 51(2). 58–62.
Malacrida, Claudia and Tiffany Boulton. 2012. Women’s perceptions of childbirth “choices”: Competing discourses of motherhood, sexuality, and selflessness. Gender & Society 26(5). 748–772.
Meyer, Charles. 2009. Introducing English linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, Sara. 2008. Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Okamoto, Shigeko. 2016. Variability and multiplicity in the meanings of stereotypical gendered speech in Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1). 5–37.
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(2). 147–164.
Peirce, Charles. 1934. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peng, Altman Yuzhu. 2021. Neoliberal feminism, gender relations, and a feminized male ideal in China: A critical discourse analysis of Mimeng’s WeChat posts. Feminist Media Studies 22(1). 115–131.
Prager, Karen and Linda Roberts. 2004. Deep intimate connection: Self and intimacy in couple relationships. In D. Mashek and A. Aron (eds.) Handbook of closeness and intimacy. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 53–70.
Reis, Harry, Margaret Clark and John Holmes. 2004. Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. Mashek and A. Aron (eds.) Handbook of closeness and intimacy. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 201–225.
Rosenlee, Lisa. 2006. Confucianism and women: A philosophical interpretation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Savoy, Jacques. 2017a. Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33(1). 143–159.
Savoy, Jacques. 2017b. Trump’s and Clinton’s style and rhetoric during the 2016 presidential election. Journal of Quant. Linguist. 25(2). 168–189.
Sclafani, Jennifer. 2018. Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, meta-discourse, and political identity. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Searle, John. 1989. How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5). 535–558.
Sugiura, Lisa, Rosemary Wiles and Catherine Pope. 2017. Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics 13(34). 184–199.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thaler, Verena. 2012. Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force. Pragmatics 44. 907–919.
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. Ideological discourse analysis. In E. Ventola and A. Solin (eds.) Interdisciplinary approaches to discourse analysis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. 135–161.
van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds.) Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. 21–63.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, Haiting and Jun Gao. 2022. On the generalization mechanism of Chinese kinship term “jiejie.”. English Language and Literature Studeis of Canadian Center of Science and Education 12(2). 74–78.
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, language and discourse. East Sussex: Routledge.
West, Candace and Don Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1. 125–151.
Wodak, Ruth and Gertraud Benke. 2017. Gender as a sociolinguistic variable: New perspectives on variation studies. In F. Coulmas (ed.) The handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 127–150.
Wu, Guanghong. 2015. A brief introduction to the responses of duibuqi. Journal of Liaoning Teachers College 4. 6–7.
Wu, Jue and Wei Wang. 2016. “Apology accepted”: A cross-cultural study of responses to apologies by native speakers of English and Chinese. International Journal of English Linguistics 6(2). 63–78.
Yang, Guangcheng and Zhongliang Liu. 2019. On the enlightenment of western feminism to the development of Chinese women. Culture of Chinese Character 7. 131–132.
Yang, Xiujuan and Fei Wang. 2014. Exploring gender discourse differences: Taking discourse presupposition as an example. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology (Social Science) 27(7). 118–121.
Yang, Xiaojuan and Meimei Wang. 2022. Influence factors of Chinese urban residents’ marriage choice on perspective of marriage view changing: A study of Chengdu. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science) 58(1). 130–134.
Yin, Xiuli. 2017. The grammaticalization of Meishi-er. Journal of Hubei University of Education 6. 27–30. No. 1674-344X (2017) 6-0027-04.
Yuan, Changpu and Dan Zhang. 2008. The pragmatic vagueness of the language of romance. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition) 9. 139–140.
Zappavigna, Michelle and James R. Martin. 2018. Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media. Discourse, Context & Media 22. 4–12.
Zhang, Chao and Shihai Zong. 2015. A comparative study of male and female politeness strategies in Chinese talk shows. Applied Linguistics 1. 46–55.