Plural pronouns can have split antecedents distributed in various positions. This article scrutinizes the distribution of plural pronouns taking split antecedents in English, relying heavily on informant judgments to determine acceptability. Two conditions on split antecedents are proposed. These conditions are expressed in terms of the valents of predicates in a dependency grammar (DG) framework of syntax. The DG approach proves to be effective in cases that challenge semantic predicate-argument approaches.
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baum, Richard. 1976. Dependenzgrammatik: Tesnière's Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Vol. 151). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2020. Logophoricity and locality: A view from French anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 51(4). 671–723.
Charnavel, Isabelle and Shannon Bryant. 2022. The whole picture: Disentangling locality, logophoricity and subjecthood in English picture noun anaphora. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41. 547–610.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Culicover, Peter W. 2009. Natural language syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, Peter W. and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drosdowski, Günther, Gerhard Augst and Helmut Gipper (eds.). 1984. Duden: Die Grammatik Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Engel, Ulrich. 1994. Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 3rd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Eroms, Hans-Werner. 2000. Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Fiengo, Robert and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.). 2000. Linguistics: An introduction to linguistic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Gerhard Helbig and Joachim Buscha. 1998. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht, 18th edn. Leipzig: Langenscheidt.
Giorgi, Alessandra. 1984. Toward a theory of long distance anaphors: A GB approach. The Linguistic Review 3. 307–361.
Helke, Michael. 1970. The grammar of English reflexives. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relation ns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical form, binding, and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14(3). 395–420.
Hoji, Hajime. 1995. Demonstrative binding and Principle B. In J. Beckman (ed.) Proceedings-NELS, Vol. 25. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts. 255–272.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffreey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jung, Wha-Young. 1995. Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenzgrammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Kearns, Kate. 2011. Semantics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2002. Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns. More Than Words 53. 179–226.
Koster, Jan. 1984. On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 417–459.
Lebeaux, David. 1984. Locality and anaphoric binding. The Linguistic Review 4. 343–363.
Lidz, Jeffrey. 2001. Condition R. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 123–140.
Minkoff, Seth A. 2004. Consciousness, backward coreference, and logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 485–494.
O’Grady, William. 1998. The syntax of idioms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16. 79–312.
Okada, Sadayuki. 1998. Reflexive pronouns with split antecedents. Journal of Pragmatics 30(1). 59–84.
Osborne, Timothy. 2005. Beyond the constituent: A DG analysis of chains. Folia Linguistica 39(3–4). 251–297.
Osborne, Timothy. 2019. A dependency grammar of English: An introduction and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Osborne, Timothy and Thomas Groß. 2016. The do-so-diagnostic: Against finite VPs and for flat non-finite VPs. Folia Linguistica 50(1). 97–135.
Osborne, Timothy, Michael Putnam and Thomas Groß. 2012. Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax 15. 354–396.
Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag. 1992. Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2). 261–303.
Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications & Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Poole, Geoffrey. 2002. Syntactic theory. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Postal, Paul M. 2006. Remarks on English long-distance anaphora. Style 40(1–2). 7–18.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svatvik. 2010. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India)/Pearson Education.
Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1992. Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective. In E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.) The representation of (in)definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 130–167.
Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 657–720.
Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reuland, Eric. 2018. Reflexives and reflexivity. Annual Review of Linguistics 4. 81–107.
Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Safir, Kenneth. 2004. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. Non-redundancy: Towards a semantic reinterpretation of binding theory. Natural Language Semantics 13(1). 1–92.
Seely, Daniel T. 1993. Binding plural pronominals. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, S. Kita, K.-E. McCullough and D. Testen (eds.) CLS29: Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. 305–317.
Tarvainen, Kalevi. 1981. Einführung in die Dependenzgrammatik, 2nd edn. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 35). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck.
Tesnière, Lucien. 2015 (1969). Elements of structural syntax, translated by Timothy Osborne and Sylvain Kahane. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Uzonyi, Pal. 2003. Dependenzstruktur und Konstituenzstruktur. In V. Ágel, L. Eichinger, H.-W. Eroms, P. Hellwig, H.-J. Heringer and H. Lobin (eds.) Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 230–247.
Varaschin, G. 2020. Anti-reflexivity and logophoricity: An account of unexpected reflexivization contrasts. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1).
Wasow, Thomas. 1979. Anaphora in generative grammar. Ghent: Story-Scientia.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 56. 695–727.