Authors:
Shuxiang You Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao SAR, China

Search for other papers by Shuxiang You in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-813X
,
Yanrong Du Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Yanrong Du in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Qingyi Chen The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Search for other papers by Qingyi Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study investigated the production of Mandarin and Fuzhou lexical tones by Mandarin-Fuzhou bilingual children. Forty children aged 6;11 to 7;6 and two groups of adults (Mandarin speakers and Fuzhou speakers) were asked to produce pre-selected familiar monosyllabic words. Adult judges' perceptual judgments and acoustic analysis showed that: (1) overall, these children's production performance of Mandarin tones was similar to adults', with very high accuracy; (2) children did not reach adult-like production competence in Fuzhou tones by age 7;6; and (3) there was an imbalance in children's development of the seven lexical tones in Fuzhou. Children's late and unbalanced development of Fuzhou tones could be ascribed to their unbalanced Mandarin-Fuzhou exposure, and it is argued that children might transfer the characteristics of the Mandarin tonal system to their production of Fuzhou tones.

  • Abudarham, Samuel. 1987. Fact and friction. In S. Abudarham (ed.) Bilingualism and the bilingual: An interdisciplinary approach to pedagogical and remedial issues. Birshire: NFER-Nelson. 1534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernardini, Petra and Suzanne Schlyter. 2004. Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The ivy hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(1). 4969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Computer program, Version 6.1.16. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cao, Jianfen. 2012. Pitch prominence and tonal typology for low register tone in Mandarin. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL2012). Retrieved from https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/tal_2012/cao12_tal.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chan, Marjorie. 1980. Syntax and phonology interface: The case of tone sandhi in the Fuzhou dialect of Chinese. Manuscript. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1930. A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45. 2427.

  • Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1951. The Cantian idiolect: An analysis of the Chinese spoken by a twenty-eight-months-old child. In W. J. Fischel (ed.) Semitic and oriental studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 2744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Matthew. 2000. Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chen, Leo and Jerry Norman. 1965. An introduction to the Foochow dialect. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State College.

  • Chen, Ping. 1999. Modern Chinese: History and sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chen, Zeping. 1998. Fuzhou fangyan yanjiu [A study of the Fuzhou dialect]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.

  • Clumeck, Harold. 1980. The acquisition of tone. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanaugh and C. A. Ferguson (eds.) Child phonology, Vol. I: Production. New York, NY: Academic Press. 257275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Houwer, Annick. 1995. Bilingual language acquisition. In P. Fletcher and B. MacWhinney (eds.) The handbook of child language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. 219250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Donohue, Cathryn. 2013. Fuzhou tonal acoustics and tonology. Munich: Lincom Europa.

  • Duanmu, San. 2000. The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76(5). 378382.

  • Fleiss, Joseph L., Bruce Levin and Myunghee Cho Paik. 2003. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edn. Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Grech, Helen and Sharynne McLeod. 2012. Multilingual speech and language development and disorders. In D. Battle (ed.) Communication disorders in multicultural populations, 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. 120147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grüter, Theres and Johanne Paradis (eds.). 2014. Input and experience in bilingual development. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holm, Alison and Barbara Dodd. 1999. A longitudinal study of the phonological development of two Cantonese–English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics 20(3). 349376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holm, Alison and Barbara Dodd. 2006. Phonological development and disorder of bilingual children acquiring Cantonese and English. In H. Zhu and B. Dodd (eds.) Phonological development and disorders in children: A multilingual perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 286325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsu, Hui-Chuan. 1989. Phonological acquisition of Taiwanese: A longitudinal case study. M.A. thesis. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, Mingxiao and Zhenxing Zhang. 2020. Yue Gang Ao Dawanqu yuyan yanjiu zongshu [A review of research on linguistic varieties used in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning 1. 3445.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Expert Panel on Multilingual Children's Speech. 2012. Multilingual children with speech sound disorders: Position paper. Retrieved from https://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/iepmcs.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landis, Richard and Gary Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33. 159174.

  • Law, Naska and Lydia So. 2006. The relationship of phonological development and language dominance in bilingual Cantonese–Putonghua children. International Journal of Bilingualism 10(4). 405427.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1977. The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 4(2). 185199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, David C. S. 2006. Chinese as a lingua franca in greater China. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 26. 149176.

  • Li, Rulong, Yuzhang Liang, Guangchun Zou and Zeping Chen. 1994. Fuzhou fangyan cidian [The dictionary of the Fuzhou dialect]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Shihuan. 2013. Tuipu huanjing xia fangyan de shengcun xianzhuang yu fazhan: Yi Fuzhouhua weili [Living situation and the development of the dialects in the circumstance of promoting Putonghua: Taking Fuzhou dialect as an example]. M.A. thesis. Tianjin University, Tianjin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Xiaolin. 2020. The acquisition of Xiamen citation tones and tone sandhi by children. M.Phil. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Light, Timothy. 1977. CLAIRETALK: A Cantonese-speaking child's confrontation with bilingualism. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5(2). 261275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007. The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Luang-Thongkum, Theraphan. 1997. Tone change and language contact: A case study of Mien-Yao and Thai. In A. S. Abramson (ed.) Southeast Asian linguistic studies in honour of Vichin Panupong. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. 153160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mok, Peggy, Holly Fung and Vivian Li. 2019. Assessing the link between perception and production in Cantonese tone acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(5). 12431257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mok, Peggy and Albert Lee. 2018. The acquisition of lexical tones by Cantonese–English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 45(6). 13571376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mok, Peggy, Vivian Li and Holly Fung. 2020. Development of phonetic contrasts in Cantonese tone acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63(1). 95108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montrul, Silvina. 2008. Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. Bilingual language development. In M. Barrett (ed.) The development of language. Hove: Psychology Press. 252275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rose, Phil. 1987. Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication 6(4). 343351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. 2006. Communicating quality, 3rd edn. London: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • So, Lydia and Barbara Dodd. 1995. The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 22(3). 473495.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • So, Lydia and Cheung-Shing Leung. 2006. Phonological development of Cantonese-Putonghua bilingual children. In H. Zhu and B. Dodd (eds.) Phonological development and disorders in children: A multilingual perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 413428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tang, Zhixiang and Deliang Liu. 2008. Shenzhen Tai Gang qingnian xuesheng de yuyan quxiang he yuyan rentong [Language orientation and language identity of Taiwan and Hong Kong youth students in Shenzhen]. Research on Chinese as a Second Language 00. 199213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • To, Carol, Pamela Cheung and Sharynne McLeod. 2013. A population study of children’s acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese consonants, vowels, and tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56(1). 103122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thurgood, Graham. 1999. From ancient Cham to modern dialects: Two thousand years of language contact and change. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 28). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsay, Jane. 2001. Taiwanhua shengdiao xide de yanjiu [Study on the acquisition of Taiwanese tones]. Bashijiu nian Guokehui Yuyanxuemen (yiban yuyanxue) yanjiu chengguo fabiaohui lunwenji [Proceedings of the 2000 Research Symposium of Linguistics Division (General Linguistics), National Science Council]. 237255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tse, John K. P. 1978. Tone acquisition in Cantonese: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language 5(2). 191204.

  • Valdés, Guadalupe and Richard Figueroa. 1994. Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Wong, Puisan. 2012. Acoustic characteristics of three-year-olds’ correct and incorrect monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone productions. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 141151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wong, Puisan. 2013. Perceptual evidence for protracted development in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(1). 434443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wong, Puisan, Wing Fu and Eunice Cheung. 2017. Cantonese-speaking children do not acquire tone perception before tone production: A perceptual and acoustic study of three-year-olds’ monosyllabic tones. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 1450. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01450/full.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wong, Puisan and Carrie Leung. 2018. Suprasegmental features are not acquired early: Perception and production of monosyllabic Cantonese lexical tones in 4- to 6-year-old preschool children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61(5). 10701085.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wong, Puisan, Richard Schwartz and James Jenkins. 2005. Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48(5). 10651079.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wong, Puisan and Winifred Strange. 2017. Phonetic complexity affects children’s Mandarin tone production accuracy in disyllabic words: A perceptual study. Plos One 12(8). 121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Rattanasone, Ping Tang, Ivan Yuen, Liqun Gao and Katherine Demuth. 2018. Five-year-olds’ acoustic realization of Mandarin tone sandhi and lexical tones in context are not yet fully adult-like. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 817. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00817/full.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Yi. 2013. ProsodyPro: A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In B. Bigi and D. Hirst (eds.) Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013). Aix-en-ProvenceLaboratoire Parole et Langage. 710. Retrieved from http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/∼uclyyix/yispapers/Xu_TRASP2013.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yao, Yao, Angel Chan, Roxana Fung, Wing-Li Wu, Natalie Leung, Sarah Lee and Jin Luo. 2020. Cantonese tone production in pre-school Urdu–Cantonese bilingual minority children. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(4). 767782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • You, Shuxiang. 2018. Clitics and the clitic group in the Fuzhou dialect. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5(1). 125166.

  • You, Shuxiang. 2020. Prosodic phonology of the Fuzhou dialect: Domains and rule application. London & New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Zhang, Hang. 2016. The effect of theoretical assumptions on pedagogical methods: A case study of second language Chinese tones. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(2). 363382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, Hongming. 1992. Topics in Chinese phrasal tonology. Doctoral dissertation. UCSD, San Diego, CA.

  • Zhang, Hongming. 2013. Hanyu yuyanxue yu Meiguo bentu hanyu jiaoxue [Chinese linguistics and Chinese language teaching in the United States]. Newsletter of the International Society for Chinese Language Teaching 2013(4). 1419.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, Hongming. 2017. Syntax-phonology interface: Argumentation from tone sandhi in Chinese dialects. London & New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, Xiaonong. 1999. Shanghai tonetics. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

  • Zhu, Hua. 2002. Phonological development in specific contexts: Studies of Chinese-speaking children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

  • Zhu, Xiaonong. 2005. Shanghai shengdiao shiyanlu [An experimental study of Shanghai tones]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.

  • Zhu, Hua and Barbara Dodd. 2000. The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (Modern Standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language 27(1). 342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instructions are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

 

Editors

Editor-in-Chief: András Cser

Editor: György Rákosi

Review Editor: Tamás Halm

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé / Université Paris Diderot
  • Željko Bošković / University of Connecticut
  • Marcel den Dikken / Eötvös Loránd University; Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Elly van Gelderen / Arizona State University
  • Anders Holmberg / Newcastle University
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt / University of Cambridge
  • Dániel Z. Kádár / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • István Kenesei / University of Szeged; Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Anikó Lipták / Leiden University
  • Katalin Mády / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Gereon Müller / Leipzig University
  • Csaba Pléh / Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Central European University
  • Giampaolo Salvi / Eötvös Loránd University
  • Irina Sekerina / College of Staten Island CUNY
  • Péter Siptár / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest
  • Gregory Stump / University of Kentucky
  • Peter Svenonius / University of Tromsø
  • Anne Tamm / Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church
  • Akira Watanabe / University of Tokyo
  • Jeroen van de Weijer / Shenzhen University

 

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
56
Journal Impact Factor 0.5
Rank by Impact Factor

Linguistics (Q4)

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0.4
5 Year
Impact Factor
0.5
Journal Citation Indicator 0.59
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Language and Linguistics (Q2)
Linguistics (Q3)

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.592
Scimago Quartile Score

Cultural Studies (Q1)
Linguistics and Language (Q1)
Literature and Literary Theory (Q1)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Literature and Literary Theory 24/982 (97th PCTL)
Cultural Studies 212/1203 (82nd PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
1.159

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
63
Journal Impact Factor 0,690
Rank by Impact Factor

Linguistics 145/194

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,667
5 Year
Impact Factor
1,286
Journal Citation Indicator 0,67
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Language & Linguistics 141/370

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,341
Scimago Quartile Score Cultural Studies (Q1)
Linguistics and Language (Q1)
Literature and Literary Theory (Q1)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Literature and Literary Theory 22/934 (D1)
Cultural Studies 164/1127 (Q1)
Scopus
SNIP
1,070

2020

 

Total Cites

219

WoS

Journal
Impact Factor

0,523

Rank by

Linguistics 150/193 (Q4)

Impact Factor

 

Impact Factor

0,432

without

Journal Self Cites

5 Year

0,500

Impact Factor

Journal 

0,72

Citation Indicator

 

Rank by Journal 

Linguistics 144/259 (Q3)

Citation Indicator 

 

Citable

19

Items

Total

19

Articles

Total

0

Reviews

Scimago

10

H-index

Scimago

0,295

Journal Rank

Scimago

Cultural Studies Q1

Quartile Score

Language and Linguistics Q2

 

Linguistics and Language Q2

 

Literature and Literary Theory Q1

Scopus

72/87=0,8

Scite Score

Scopus

Literature and Literary Theory 42/825 (Q1)

Scite Score Rank

Cultural Studies 247/1037 (Q1)

Scopus

1,022

SNIP

Days from 

58

submission

to acceptance

Days from 

68

acceptance

to publication

Acceptance

51%

Rate

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
155
Impact Factor 0,222
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,156
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,322
Immediacy
Index
0,870
Citable
Items
23
Total
Articles
23
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
11,2
Citing
Half-Life
16,6
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00006
Article Influence
Score
0,056
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,00780
Average
IF
Percentile
9,358
Scimago
H-index
9
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,281
Scopus
Scite Score
53/85=0,6
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Cultural Studies 293/1002 (Q2)
Literature and Literary Theory 60/823(Q1)
Scopus
SNIP
0,768
Acceptance
Rate
25%

 

Acta Linguistica Academica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 572 EUR / 696 USD
Print + online subscription: 656 EUR / 796 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Linguistica Academica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2017 (1951)
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia   
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2559-8201 (Print)
ISSN 2560-1016 (Online)