The most widespread classification system for pebble shapes in geology is the Zingg system which relies on several length measurements. Here we propose a completely different classification system which involves counting static equilibria. We show that our system is practically applicable: simple hand experiments are suitable and easy to use to determine equilibrium classes. We also propose a simplified classification scheme called E-classification which is considerably faster in practice than the classical Zingg method. Based on statistical results of 1000 pebbles from several different geologic locations we show that E-classes are closely related to the geometric shape of pebbles. We compared E-classes to the Zingg classes, and we found that all the information contained in Zingg classification can be extracted from equilibrium classification. However, the new method is more sophisticated: it may help to identify shape attributes not discovered so far and it is able to store information on special geometries, e.g. on crystal shapes.
V.I. Arnold 1998 Ordinary differential equations MIT Press Cambridge.
B.C. Aschenbrenner 1956 A new method of expressing particle sphericity Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 26 15 31.
D.I. Benn C.K. Ballantyne 1992 Pebble shape (and size!) — discussion Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62 1147 1150.
S.J. Blott K. Pye 2008 Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification Sedimentology 55 31 63.
Corey, A.T. 1949: Influence of shape on fall velocity of sand grains. — unpublished MSc Thesis, Colorado A&M College.
J.E. Dobkins R.L. Folk 1970 Shape development on Tahiti-Nui Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40 1167 1203.
G. Domokos A. Sipos T. Szabó P. Várkonyi 2010 Pebbles, shapes, and equilibria Mathematical Geosciences 42 29 47.
D.J. Graham N.G. Midgley 2000 Graphical representation of particle shape using triangular diagrams: an Excel spreadsheat method Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25 1473 1477.
T. Hahn 2002 International Tables for Crystallography, Volume A: Space Group Symmetry 5th edition Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.
W.K. Illenberger 1991 Pebble shape (and size!) Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 61 756 767.
W.K. Illenberger 1992 Pebble shape (and size!) — reply Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62 538 540.
W.K. Illenberger 1992 Pebble shape (and size!) — reply Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62 1151 1155.
W.C. Krumbein 1941 Measurement and geologic significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 11 64 72.
A. Mock D.A. Jerram 2005 Crystal Size Distributions (CSD) in three dimensions: Insights from the 3D reconstruction of a highly porphyritic rhyolite Journal of Petrology 46 1525 1541.
R.J. Oakey M. Green P.A. Carling M.W.E. Lee D.A. Sear J. Warburton 2005 Grain-shape analysis — a new method for determining representative particle shapes for populations of natural grains Journal of Sedimentary Research 75 1065 1073.
I.J. Smalley 1967 The presentation of subjective shape and roundness data Sedimentology 8 35 38.
E. Sneed R.L. Folk 1958 Pebbles in the lower Colorado River, Texas, a study in particle morphogenesis Journal of Geology 66 114 150.
P. Várkonyi G. Domokos 2006 Static equilibria of rigid bodies: dice, pebbles and the Poincaré-Hopf Theorem Journal of Nonlinear Science 16 255 281.
Wentworth, C.K. 1922: The shapes of beach pebbles. — US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 131-C, pp. 75–83.
A. Woronow 1992 Pebble shape (and size!) — discussion Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62 536 537.
T. Zingg 1935 Beitrag zur Schotteranalyse Schweizeriscke Mineralogische und Petrologische Mitteilungen 15 39 140.