Authors:
Sima Rezvantalab Urmia University of Technology, P.O. Box 57166-419, Urmia, Iran

Search for other papers by Sima Rezvantalab in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Fatemeh Bahadori Urmia University of Technology, P.O. Box 57166-419, Urmia, Iran

Search for other papers by Fatemeh Bahadori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The purpose of this study is to experimentally investigate the SAR (Sodium Adsorption Ratio) and TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) reduction in reverse osmosis (RO) concentrate, using two types of natural zeolites. In order to reduce salinity of wastewater, experiments are carried out by varying the type of zeolite, concentration of zeolite, and residence time. The results show that both zeolites can lower the SAR and TDS of wastewater; however, Rhyolitic tuff is more effective than clinoptilolite. It is observed that the concentration of zeolite has not significant effects on wastewater treatment so, using the lowest level of selected concentration reduces the cost of desalination. In addition, the effect of residence time is negligible. The experimental set up shows that the SAR reduction slop is higher than TDS.

  • [1]

    Arun Subramani , Joseph G. Jacangelo, “Treatment technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate volume minimization: A review”, Separation and Purification Technology 122 (2014) 472489

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Guolin Jing , Xiaoyu Wang, Hai Zhao, “Study on TDS removal from polymer-flooding wastewater in crude oil: Extraction by electrodialysis”, Desalination 244 (2009) 9096

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Farah Mohammadesmaeili , Mostafa Kabiri Badr, Morteza Abbaszadegan, Peter Fox, “Byproduct recovery from reclaimed water reverse osmosis concentrate using lime and soda-ash Treatment”, Water Environ. Res. 82 (2010) 342

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [4]

    O.I. Nkwonta , G.M. Ochieng, “Total dissolved solids removal in wastewater using roughing filters”, Chemical Sciences Journal 2010: CSJ-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [5]

    S.M. Mrayed , P. Sanciolo, L. Zou, G. Leslie, “An alternative membrane treatment process to produce low-salt and high-nutrient recycled water suitable for irrigation purposes”, Desalination 274 (2011) 144149

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [6]

    Aiman E. Al-Rawajfeh , Khaldoon Al-Whoosh, Reyad Al Dwariri, Ahmad Al-Maaberah, Amer Tarawneh, “Pre-treatment of desalination feed seawater by Jordanian Tripoli, Pozzalana and Feldespar: Batch experiments”, Chemical Industry &Chemical Engineering Quarterly 17(2) (2011) 163171

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Karel Ghyselbrechta , Emmanuel van Houtteb, Luc Pinoycd, Johan Verbauwhedeb, Bart van der Bruggend, Boudewijn Meesschaert, “Treatment of RO concentrate by means of a combination of a willow field and electrodialysis”, Resources, Conservationand Recycling 65 (2012) 116123

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Sayyed-Hassan Tabatabaei , Payam Najafi, Sayyed Mohammad Javad Mirzaei, Zohreh Nazem, Manouchehr Heidarpour, Shapoor Hajrasoliha, Majid Afyuni, Habiballah Beigi Harchegani, Esmaeel Landi, Leila Akasheh, Mohammad Zamanian, Mehdi Barani and Houssin Amini, “Compost leachate recycling through land treatment and application of natural Zeolite”, International Journal of Recycling ofOrganic Waste in Agriculture 1 (2012) 2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [9]

    S. Hassanpour Aslania , H. Ghafourianb, M. R. Ardakanic, S. Torabid, “Feasibility study of reducing the total dissolved solids (TDS) from contaminated water in radish plant (Raphanus Sativus) using nano activated carbon and zeolite”, JNS 3 (2013) 219225

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

 

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Felföldi, József

Chair of the Editorial Board Szendrő, Péter

Editorial Board

  • Beke, János (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineerin, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Fenyvesi, László (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Szendrő, Péter (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Felföldi, József (Szent István University, Faculty of Food Science, Budapest – Hungary)

 

Advisory Board

  • De Baerdemaeker, Josse (KU Leuven, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Leuven - Belgium)
  • Funk, David B. (United States Department of Agriculture | USDA • Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), Kansas City – USA
  • Geyer, Martin (Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Department of Horticultural Engineering, Potsdam - Germany)
  • Janik, József (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Kutzbach, Heinz D. (Institut für Agrartechnik, Fg. Grundlagen der Agrartechnik, Universität Hohenheim – Germany)
  • Mizrach, Amos (Institute of Agricultural Engineering. ARO, the Volcani Center, Bet Dagan – Israel)
  • Neményi, Miklós (Széchenyi University, Department of Biosystems and Food Engineering, Győr – Hungary)
  • Schulze-Lammers, Peter (University of Bonn, Institute of Agricultural Engineering (ILT), Bonn – Germany)
  • Sitkei, György (University of Sopron, Institute of Wood Engineering, Sopron – Hungary)
  • Sun, Da-Wen (University College Dublin, School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, Agriculture and Food Science, Dublin – Ireland)
  • Tóth, László (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)

Prof. Felföldi, József
Institute: MATE - Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Measurements and Process Control
Address: 1118 Budapest Somlói út 14-16
E-mail: felfoldi.jozsef@uni-mate.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABI
  • ERIH PLUS
  • SCOPUS

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
9
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.191
Scimago Quartile Score

Environmental Engineering (Q4)
Industrial Manufacturing Engineering (Q3)
Mechanical Engineering (Q3)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.1
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141/213 (34th PCTL)
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104/147 (29th PCTL)
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 261/355 (26th PCTL)
Mechanical Engineering 494/631 (21st PCTL)
Environmental Engineering 145/184 (21st PCTL)
 
Scopus
SNIP
0.222

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
8
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,141
Scimago Quartile Score Environmental Engineering (Q4)
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (Q4)
Mechanical Engineering (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
0,8
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 261/338 (Q4)
Environmental Engineering 138/173 (Q4)
Mechanical Engineering 495/601 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,381

2020  
Scimago
H-index
8
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,197
Scimago
Quartile Score
Environmental Engineering Q4
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Q3
Mechanical Engineering Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
33/69=0,5
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Environmental Engineering 126/146 (Q4)
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 269/336 (Q3)
Mechanical Engineering 512/596 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,211
Scopus
Cites
53
Scopus
Documents
41
Days from submission to acceptance 122
Days from acceptance to publication 40
Acceptance rate 86%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
6
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,123
Scimago
Quartile Score
Environmental Engineering Q4
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Q4
Mechanical Engineering Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
18/33=0,5
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Environmental Engineering 108/132 (Q4)
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 242/340 (Q3)
Mechanical Engineering 481/585 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,211
Scopus
Cites
13
Scopus
Documents
5

 

Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 152 EUR / 185 USD
Print + online subscription: 177 EUR / 215 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles can be purchased at the prices indicated.

Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2004
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
1
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1786-335X (Print)
ISSN 1787-0321 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Nov 2023 5 6 0
Dec 2023 81 2 0
Jan 2024 51 2 1
Feb 2024 45 0 0
Mar 2024 113 0 0
Apr 2024 29 0 0
May 2024 0 0 0