Authors:
Cecilia Hodúr University of Szeged Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical and Process Engineering Department Moszkvai krt. 5-7 H-6725 Szeged Hungary

Search for other papers by Cecilia Hodúr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Szabolcs Kertész University of Szeged Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical and Process Engineering Department Moszkvai krt. 5-7 H-6725 Szeged Hungary

Search for other papers by Szabolcs Kertész in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
József Csanádi University of Szeged Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Science Moszkvai krt. 5-7 H-6725 Szeged Hungary

Search for other papers by József Csanádi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gábor Szabó University of Szeged Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical and Process Engineering Department Moszkvai krt. 5-7 H-6725 Szeged Hungary

Search for other papers by Gábor Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Zsuzsanna László University of Szeged Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical and Process Engineering Department Moszkvai krt. 5-7 H-6725 Szeged Hungary

Search for other papers by Zsuzsanna László in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

In this study the performance of a vibratory shear-enhanced processing system (VSEP) for the concentration of cheese whey was assessed and compared with a classical, cross-flow, plate and frame membrane configuration system (3DTA) with the same membrane (i.e. a C30F UF regenerated cellulose UF membrane with a 30 kDa molecular weight cutoff). The temperature and pressure dependences of the permeate flux, the permeate flux reduction ratio, the resistances and the rejection values were investigated. Comparison of the two systems revealed a definite advantage for the VSEP system equipped with the same membrane and operated at the same pressure and temperature. The VSEP system yielded a permeate protein retention of 99.7% vs. 74.5% for the 3DTA system, together with a higher average flux: 54 L m −2 h −1 vs. 44.2 L m −2 h −1 . The flux reduction ratio ( J/J0 ) was 0.60 vs. 0.42, and the total resistances 2.87*10 +13 m −1 vs. 4.54*10 +13 m −1 for the VSEP and 3DTA system, respectively.

  • Al-Akoum, O., Ding, L.H., Jaffrin, M.Y. (2002) Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of UHT skim milk with a vibrating membranes module. Separation and Purification Technology 28: 219–234.

    Jaffrin M.Y. , 'Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of UHT skim milk with a vibrating membranes module ' (2002 ) 28 Separation and Purification Technology : 219 -234 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Al-Akoum, O., Jaffrin, M.Y., Ding, L.H., Frappart, M. (2004) Treatment of dairy process waters using vibrating filtration system and NF and RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 235: 111–122.

    Frappart M. , 'Treatment of dairy process waters using vibrating filtration system and NF and RO membranes ' (2004 ) 235 Journal of Membrane Science : 111 -122 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Castro, B.N., Gerla, P.E. (2005) Hollow fiber and spiral cheese ultrafiltration: minimizing controlling resistances. Journal of Food Engineering 69: 495–502.

    Gerla P.E. , 'Hollow fiber and spiral cheese ultrafiltration: minimizing controlling resistances ' (2005 ) 69 Journal of Food Engineering : 495 -502 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Daufin, G., Escudier, J.-P., Carrere, H., Berot, S., Fillaudeau, L., Decloux, M. (2001) Recent and emerging applications of membrane processes in the food and dairy industry. Trans IChemE. , 79Part C: 89–102.

    Decloux M. , 'Recent and emerging applications of membrane processes in the food and dairy industry ' (2001 ) 79 Trans IChemE. : 89 -102 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gesan-Guiziou, G., Boyaval, E., Daufin, G. (2003) Conditions critiques et mecanismes de transfert en nanofiltration et osmose inverse de lait ecrémé, in: Proc. 7ieme Colloque Prosetia , Univ.of Compiegne, France, 19–20 Marc 2003, 23–29.

    Daufin G. , '', in Proc. 7ieme Colloque Prosetia , (2003 ) -.

  • Marshall, A.D., Munro, P.A., Tragisdh, G. (1993) The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity. Desalination 91: 65–108.

    Tragisdh G. , 'The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity ' (1993 ) 91 Desalination : 65 -108 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Molina, J.M., Vatai, Gy., Fogarassy, E., Bekassy-Molnar E. (2008) Application of membrane Filtration to wastewater desalination. Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences 4:(1).

  • Nigam, M.O., Bansal, B., Chen, X.D. (2008) Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 218: 313–322.

    Chen X.D. , 'Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes ' (2008 ) 218 Desalination : 313 -322 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Saboya, L.V., Maubois, J.L. (2000) Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry. Lait 80(6): 541–553.

    Maubois J.L. , 'Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry ' (2000 ) 80 Lait : 541 -553 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Takata, K., Yamamoto, K., Brian, R., Watanabe, Y. (1999) Removal of humic substances with vibratory shear-enhanced processing membranes filtrations, Water Supply 17: 93–102.

    Watanabe Y. , 'Removal of humic substances with vibratory shear-enhanced processing membranes filtrations ' (1999 ) 17 Water Supply : 93 -102 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Takács, L., Vatai, Gy. (2006) Osmotic Pressure Modeling of White Wine Diafiltration and Red Wine Concentration by Reverse Osmosis Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences 2:(1) December 2006 DOI: 10.1556/Progress.2.2006.1.6

  • Yorgun, M.S., Balcioglu, I. A., Saygin, O. (2008) Performance comparison of ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis on whey treatment. Desalination 229: 204–216.

    Saygin O. , 'Performance comparison of ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis on whey treatment ' (2008 ) 229 Desalination : 204 -216 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Felföldi, József

Chair of the Editorial Board Szendrő, Péter

Editorial Board

  • Beke, János (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineerin, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Fenyvesi, László (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Szendrő, Péter (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Felföldi, József (Szent István University, Faculty of Food Science, Budapest – Hungary)

 

Advisory Board

  • De Baerdemaeker, Josse (KU Leuven, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Leuven - Belgium)
  • Funk, David B. (United States Department of Agriculture | USDA • Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), Kansas City – USA
  • Geyer, Martin (Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Department of Horticultural Engineering, Potsdam - Germany)
  • Janik, József (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)
  • Kutzbach, Heinz D. (Institut für Agrartechnik, Fg. Grundlagen der Agrartechnik, Universität Hohenheim – Germany)
  • Mizrach, Amos (Institute of Agricultural Engineering. ARO, the Volcani Center, Bet Dagan – Israel)
  • Neményi, Miklós (Széchenyi University, Department of Biosystems and Food Engineering, Győr – Hungary)
  • Schulze-Lammers, Peter (University of Bonn, Institute of Agricultural Engineering (ILT), Bonn – Germany)
  • Sitkei, György (University of Sopron, Institute of Wood Engineering, Sopron – Hungary)
  • Sun, Da-Wen (University College Dublin, School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, Agriculture and Food Science, Dublin – Ireland)
  • Tóth, László (Szent István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gödöllő – Hungary)

Prof. Felföldi, József
Institute: MATE - Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Measurements and Process Control
Address: 1118 Budapest Somlói út 14-16
E-mail: felfoldi.jozsef@uni-mate.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABI
  • ERIH PLUS
  • SCOPUS

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.8
CiteScore rank Q2 (General Agricultural and Biological Sciences)
SNIP 0.497
Scimago  
SJR index 0.258
SJR Q rank Q3

Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article (only for OA publications)
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 173 EUR / 190 USD
Print + online subscription: 200 EUR / 220 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles can be purchased at the prices indicated.

Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2004
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
1
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1786-335X (Print)
ISSN 1787-0321 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Oct 2024 240 0 0
Nov 2024 236 0 0
Dec 2024 179 0 0
Jan 2025 71 0 0
Feb 2025 84 0 0
Mar 2025 51 0 0
Apr 2025 0 0 0