View More View Less
  • 1 University of Pécs, Boszorkány u. 2, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
Restricted access

Experience shows that the nuclear power plant can be safely designed for vibratory effects of earthquakes. Contrary to this, the plants can be heavily damaged by effects of earthquake-induced phenomena like tsunami, soil liquefaction after surviving the ground shaking effects. In the paper, the nuclear power plant’s safety analysis methodology is outlined for the case of soil liquefaction. In the paper the methodology for safety analysis of nuclear power plants for the case of liquefaction is outlined for both deterministic and probabilistic cases. It is shown, how the analysis of consequences of the liquefaction has to be embedded into the overall analysis of plant seismic safety. The selection of hazard and the fragility assessment methods is discussed from the point of view of needs of safety analysis.

  • [1]

    ASME/ANS RA-S-2008, Standard for level 1 Large early release frequency probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications 2008 American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [2]

    Katona T. J. Ahmed Wael (ed)Seismic safety analysis and upgrading of operating nuclear power plants (Chapter 4) Nuclear Power, Practical Aspects 2012 New York InTech 77 124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51368

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Seismic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations, safety guide International Atomic Energy Agency 2010 Vienna

  • [4]

    McGuire R. K., Silva W. J. & Kenneally R. New seismic design spectra for nuclear power plants Nuclear Engineering and Design 2000 203 249 257

  • [5]

    Katona T. J. & Tóth L. Damages indicators for post-earthquake condition assessment Acta Geod Geophys 2013 48 333 345 DOI 10.1007/s40328-013-0021-9

  • [6]

    Dashti S., Bray J. D., Pestana J. M., Riemer M. & Wilson D. Mechanisms of seismically induced settlement of buildings with shallow foundations on liquefiable soil J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 2010 136 1 151 164

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Győri E., Tóth L., Gráczer Z. & Katona T. Liquefaction and post-liquefaction settlement assessment - a probabilistic approach Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica 2011 46 3 347 369

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [8]

    Tokimatsu K. & Seed H. B. Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 1987 113 8 861 879

  • [9]

    US NRC 2003 Procedures and criteria for assessing seismic soil liquefaction at nuclear power plant sites Regulatory Guide 1.198, November 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [10]

    Seed R. B., Cetin K. O., Moss R. E. S., Kammerer A., Wu J., Pestana J., Riemer M., Sancio R. B., Bray J. D., Kayen R. E. & Faris A. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering, A unified and consistent framework Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report 2003 Berkeley University of California No. EERC 2003-06

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [11]

    Juang C., Jiang T. & Andrus R. Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation J. Geotech Geoenviron. Eng. 2002 128 7 580 589

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [12]

    Katona T. J. Modeling of fatigue-type seismic damage for nuclear power plants Computational Materials Science 2012 64 22 24

  • [13]

    Kramer S. L. & Mayfield R. T. Return period of soil liquefaction J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2007 133 7 802 813

  • [14]

    Cetin K. O., Seed R. B., Der Kiureghian A., Tokimatsu K., Harder L. F. Jr., Kayen R. E. & Moss R. E. S. SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2004 130 12 1314 1340

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [15]

    Idriss I. M. & Boulanger R. W. R. B Seed (ed)Soil liquefaction during earthquakes In Technical review and comments 2008 Berkeley, CA University of California 2008 EERI Monograph, Report No. UCB/GT - 2010/01

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [16]

    Holzer T. L., Noce T. E. & Bennett M. J. Liquefaction probability curves for surficial geologic deposits Environmental and Engineering Geoscience 2011 XVII 1 1 21

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [17]

    Goda K., Atkinson G. M., Hunter J. A., Crow H. & Motazedian D. Probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis for four Canadian cities Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2011 101 190 201

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [18]

    Cornell C. A. & Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, University of California Berkeley, USA PEER Center News 2000 3 2 1 3 April

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [19]

    Zareian F. & Krawinkler F. Simplified performance based earthquake engineering The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 169 2009 Stanford Uniersity

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [20]

    Katona T. J. Options for the treatment of uncertainty in seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants Pollack Periodica 2010 5 1 121 136

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [21]

    Baker J. W. & Cornell C. A. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis PEER Report 2006/08 2006 Berkeley University of California October

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [22]

    Juang C. H., Li D. K., Fang S. Y., Liu Z. & Khor E. H. Simplified procedure for developing joint distribution of amax and Mw for probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng 2008 134 1050 1058

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [23]

    Baker J. W. & Faber M. H. Liquefaction risk assessment using geostatistics to account for soil spatial variability J. Geotech. Geoenviron, ASCE 2008 14 23 January

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [24]

    Kramer S. L. & Mitchell R. A. Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation Earthquake Spectra 2006 22 2 413 438 May

  • [25]

    Katona T. J. Interpretation of the physical meaning of the cumulative absolute velocity Pollack Periodica 2011 6 1 99 106

  • [26]

    Campbell K. W. & Bozorgnia Y. Analysis of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) and JMA Instrumental Seismic Intensity (IJMA) using the PEER-NGA strong motion database Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2010/102 2010 Berkeley University of California February

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instructions template is available in MS Word.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Amália

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iványi, Péter

 

Scientific Secretary

Miklós M. Iványi

Editorial Board

  • Bálint Bachmann (Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Jeno Balogh (Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
  • Radu Bancila (Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Terrestrial Communications Ways, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, “Politehnica” University Timisoara, Romania)
  • Charalambos C. Baniotopolous (Department of Civil Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Energy Systems, Director of Resilience Centre, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, U.K.)
  • Oszkar Biro (Graz University of Technology, Institute of Fundamentals and Theory in Electrical Engineering, Austria)
  • Ágnes Borsos (Institute of Architecture, Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Matteo Bruggi (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)
  • Ján Bujňák (Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Slovakia)
  • Anikó Borbála Csébfalvi (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Mirjana S. Devetaković (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Szabolcs Fischer (Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Architerture, Civil Engineering and Transport Sciences Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Radomir Folic (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad Serbia)
  • Jana Frankovská (Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • János Gyergyák (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Kay Hameyer (Chair in Electromagnetic Energy Conversion, Institute of Electrical Machines, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)
  • Elena Helerea (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)
  • Ákos Hutter (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technolgy, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Károly Jármai (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Teuta Jashari-Kajtazi (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Prishtina, Kosovo)
  • Róbert Kersner (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Rita Kiss  (Biomechanical Cooperation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • István Kistelegdi  (Department of Building Structures and Energy Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Stanislav Kmeť (President of University Science Park TECHNICOM, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia)
  • Imre Kocsis  (Department of Basic Engineering Research, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary)
  • László T. Kóczy (Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, University of Győr, Hungary)
  • Dražan Kozak (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia)
  • György L. Kovács (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Balázs Géza Kövesdi (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Engineering and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • Tomáš Krejčí (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Jaroslav Kruis (Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Miklós Kuczmann (Department of Automations, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary)
  • Tibor Kukai (Department of Engineering Studies, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Maria Jesus Lamela-Rey (Departamento de Construcción e Ingeniería de Fabricación, University of Oviedo, Spain)
  • János Lógó  (Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)
  • Carmen Mihaela Lungoci (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, Romania)
  • Frédéric Magoulés (Department of Mathematics and Informatics for Complex Systems, Centrale Supélec, Université Paris Saclay, France)
  • Gabriella Medvegy (Department of Interior, Applied and Creative Design, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Tamás Molnár (Department of Visual Studies, Institute of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Ferenc Orbán (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Zoltán Orbán (Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Smart Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Dmitrii Rachinskii (Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas, USA)
  • Chro Radha (Chro Ali Hamaradha) (Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Technical College of Engineering, Department of City Planning, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)
  • Maurizio Repetto (Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Italy)
  • Zoltán Sári (Department of Technical Informatics, Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Grzegorz Sierpiński (Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, Poland)
  • Zoltán Siménfalvi (Institute of Energy and Chemical Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Hungary)
  • Andrej Šoltész (Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia)
  • Zsolt Szabó (Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary)
  • Mykola Sysyn (Chair of Planning and Design of Railway Infrastructure, Institute of Railway Systems and Public Transport, Technical University of Dresden, Germany)
  • András Timár (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)
  • Barry H. V. Topping (Heriot-Watt University, UK, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Hungary)

POLLACK PERIODICA
Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering
Institute: University of Pécs
Address: Boszorkány utca 2. H–7624 Pécs, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36 72) 503 650

E-mail: peter.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu 

or amalia.ivanyi@mik.pte.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • SCOPUS

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,257
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
340/243=1,4
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 219/318 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 487/693 (Q3)
General Materials Science 316/455 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 217/290 (Q4)
Software 307/389 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
1,09
Scopus
Cites
321
Scopus
Documents
67
Days from submission to acceptance 136
Days from acceptance to publication 239
Acceptance
Rate
48%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,262
Scimago
Quartile Score
Civil and Structural Engineering Q3
Computer Science Applications Q3
Materials Science (miscellaneous) Q3
Modeling and Simulation Q3
Software Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
269/220=1,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Civil and Structural Engineering 206/310 (Q3)
Computer Science Applications 445/636 (Q3)
General Materials Science 295/460 (Q3)
Modeling and Simulation 212/274 (Q4)
Software 304/373 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,933
Scopus
Cites
290
Scopus
Documents
68
Acceptance
Rate
67%

 

Pollack Periodica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 321 EUR / 402 USD
Print + online subscription: 384 EUR / 480 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

 

Pollack Periodica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2006
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 16
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
3
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1788-1994 (Print)
ISSN 1788-3911 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 0 0 0
Mar 2021 2 0 0
Apr 2021 1 0 0
May 2021 0 0 0
Jun 2021 2 0 0
Jul 2021 1 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0